Re: [sage-support] mathematica

2022-02-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 9:43 AM Henri Girard wrote: > > I am looking for the error, as I am on ubuntu 9.5 deb maybe it's not exactly > like debian ? > > I got a problem to find local I got .local ? > > > ./sage -tp --optional=debian,pip,sage,sage_spkg,mathematica >

Re: [sage-support] mathematica

2022-02-21 Thread Henri Girard
|I am looking for the error, as I am on ubuntu 9.5 deb maybe it's not exactly like debian ?| |I got a problem to find local I got .local ?| | | |./sage -tp --optional=debian,pip,sage,sage_spkg,mathematica src/sage/interfaces/mathematica.py| |= test session

Re: [sage-support] mathematica

2022-02-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Please see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33395 - we should document this, still. On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 9:08 AM Henri Girard wrote: > > Hi, > > I use mathematica engine with vscode on ubuntu22.04 after few tunings > it's working but I can't get it working on sagemath, in fact I don't > know

[sage-support] mathematica

2022-02-21 Thread Henri Girard
Hi, I use mathematica engine with vscode on ubuntu22.04 after few tunings it's working but I can't get it working on sagemath, in fact I don't know how to do it ! Any body can help me with sage ? best Henri -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-support] Mathematica interface without a temp file

2015-10-27 Thread Jacob Bond
I am working on our department servers so I don't have root access. I have aliased the math command to call mathematica. When I use the Mathematica interface (Sage version 6.3), it tries to use a temp file because at some point, allow_use_file is set to True. Is there anyway to call

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-31 Thread David Kirkby
On 28 December 2012 17:55, Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 28, 2012, at 4:47 PM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: Mathematica were not tested regularly - I don't know if that has changed. Of course, the Mathematica interface cannot be tested as often as everything

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-31 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:54 AM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.netwrote: On 28 December 2012 17:55, Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 28, 2012, at 4:47 PM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: Mathematica were not tested regularly - I don't know if that has

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-31 Thread David Kirkby
On 31 December 2012 17:09, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:54 AM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: On 28 December 2012 17:55, Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 28, 2012, at 4:47 PM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:

[sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Note to (potential) users of the sage interface to Mathematica : something seems to have changed in Mathematica version 9 interface with the rest of the world. Setup(s) : Debian wheezy with self-compiled sage v 5.4.1 then v 5.5, Mathematica Linux 64 bits V8 then V9. (1) sage v 5.4 --

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread David Kirkby
On 28 December 2012 14:53, Emmanuel Charpentier emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com wrote: Note to (potential) users of the sage interface to Mathematica : something seems to have changed in Mathematica version 9 interface with the rest of the world. Setup(s) : Debian wheezy with self-compiled sage

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 7:47 AM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.netwrote: On 28 December 2012 14:53, Emmanuel Charpentier emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com wrote: Note to (potential) users of the sage interface to Mathematica : something seems to have changed in Mathematica version 9

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread Volker Braun
On Friday, December 28, 2012 4:19:11 PM UTC, William wrote: I disagree. The only reason Sage doesn't have an interface to Mathematica written using the MathLink protocol is that nobody has got around to writting such an interface. I would like to strongly encourage people to write one.

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, December 28, 2012 4:19:11 PM UTC, William wrote: I disagree. The only reason Sage doesn't have an interface to Mathematica written using the MathLink protocol is that nobody has got around to writting such

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: I'm leaning towards a BSD-licensed C library with a RPC mechanism (tcp/ip socket or named pipe). That would be pretty minimal and you don't have to worry about Python stuff when linking on the proprietary side. Yes,

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread Ivan Andrus
On Dec 28, 2012, at 4:47 PM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: On 28 December 2012 14:53, Emmanuel Charpentier emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com wrote: Note to (potential) users of the sage interface to Mathematica : something seems to have changed in Mathematica version 9 interface

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread Volker Braun
Of course #13540 will on most machines enable internet-using tests. So somebody needs to fix the finance / stock price interfaces that currently fail their doctests *hint* *hint* ;-) On Friday, December 28, 2012 5:55:48 PM UTC, Ivan Andrus wrote: Of course, the Mathematica interface cannot

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread David Kirkby
On 28 December 2012 16:41, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, December 28, 2012 4:19:11 PM UTC, William wrote: I disagree. The only reason Sage doesn't have an interface to Mathematica written using the MathLink protocol is that nobody has got around to writting such an

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread David Kirkby
On 28 December 2012 16:47, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: also make it an optional sage package). This is what I was thinking, but I personally thought it worth asking WRI exactly where we stood if using their protocol. At the end of the day, anything you do to circumvent using their

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.netwrote: On 28 December 2012 16:47, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: also make it an optional sage package). This is what I was thinking, but I personally thought it worth asking WRI exactly where we stood if using

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread David Kirkby
On 29 December 2012 02:39, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: On 28 December 2012 16:47, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: also make it an optional sage package). This is what I was thinking, but I

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

2012-12-28 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 7:09 PM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.netwrote: On 29 December 2012 02:39, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: On 28 December 2012 16:47, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:

[sage-support] Mathematica

2010-09-09 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi Mathematica is touring South Africa. http://www.wolfram.com/events/southafrica2010/ I expect their presentation to be very professional. Reviving an old topic since Mathematica is visiting our Free Software supporting institute www.aims.ac.za on Monday. It happens to be the first day of a

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica

2010-09-09 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jan, On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote: Does anyone have anything to add, Here's a section from the Sage FAQ that raises some ethical issues in mathematics research: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/faq/faq-general.html#why-is-sage-free-open-source -- Regards

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica

2010-09-09 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 09/ 9/10 10:47 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote: * the price of the software http://www.wolfram.com/events/southafrica2010/ $139.95 even for students. I'm not sure I can convey how astronomical that amount to almost all African students. Worse, when they want to start a small business after

Re: [sage-support] Mathematica

2010-09-09 Thread Dan Drake
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 at 11:47AM +0200, Jan Groenewald wrote: Mathematica is touring South Africa. http://www.wolfram.com/events/southafrica2010/ I expect their presentation to be very professional. Reviving an old topic since Mathematica is visiting our Free Software supporting institute

[sage-support] Mathematica code conversion

2009-11-21 Thread Sterling
I'm trying to duplicate what this Mathematica code does in SAGE: F[z_]=4*Log[z^3]-2*Log[z^3-8] a=ContourPlot[If[ySqrt[3]*x, Im[F[x+I*y]]], {x, 0, 4}, {y, 0, 4}, ContourShading-False, Contours-30] b=Plot[Sqrt[3]*x, {x, 0, 4}] Show[a, b] I originally used this (this doesn't include the sqrt(3)*x

[sage-support] Mathematica 6.0 Compatibility Issue

2009-09-07 Thread mvanveen
Hello, I am attempting to get my SAGE environment to interact with Mathematica 6.0 installed in /Applications on Mac OS 10.5.8. When I attempt to evaluate a mathematica expression I get the following error: eqn = mathematica('3x + 15 == 3') Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line

[sage-support] mathematica notebooks?

2009-01-04 Thread calcpage
Hi, I see that sage can call mathematica functions - I suppose that only works if I have mathematica installed. What I'm wondering is if I can import a mathmatica notebook into sage? We used to have mathematica at my school and I remember using some very nice mathematica notebooks by Jerry

[sage-support] mathematica interface question

2008-11-28 Thread William Stein
Hi, In IRC when nobody was looking, somebody asked: 04:54 xxx stupid question: the mathematica interface of sage will open _many_ instances of mathematica. unfortunately our institute has a network license for only 4 copies. is it possible to force SAGE to use

[sage-support] Mathematica (under wine) sage interface

2008-11-20 Thread Quicksilver_Johny
I am currently running Mathematica through wine on Ubuntu. From the command line: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wine C:\Program Files\Wolfram Research\Mathematica \6.0\math.exe Mathematica 6.0 for Microsoft Windows (32-bit) Copyright 1988-2008 Wolfram Research, Inc. In[1]:= And in /usr/bin/math [EMAIL