Hi,
We have been having a few problems with a M$ Access DB held on a Samba server
Samba version: samba-2.2.4-2N1
We have rebuilt a new server, and transferred the database over to the new
box, along with word/excel docs etc. Everything is working fine, except the
access database, which is runnin
On Sunday 27 October 2002 16:37, Jay Ts wrote:
> Samba as a PDC. Samba has no limitation (AFAIK) to the number of
> clients. There are no licensing fees - this isn't Microsoft, you know? ;)
I know, but I thought Microsoft would mess the thing up with the 5 CALs on the
AD server. :)
> You might
guys .. when i run ./configure for my samba 2.2.6 .. i get this error
checking for test routines... configure: error: cant find test code.
Aborting config
I am not sure how to resolve it. I search for the archive but only found
solutions for redhat
My system : linux mandrake 9.0
cheers`
Elli
I'll let someone with more knowledge than I get into the RAID buffer
discussions but just wanted to make sure you had the same smb.conf on the
two machines? And therefore had oplocks turned off?
A recent posting which you might have already seen:
1. Always run the Access database applic
Am Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 10:27 schrieb Elliot:
> guys .. when i run ./configure for my samba 2.2.6 .. i get this error
> checking for test routines... configure: error: cant find test code.
> Aborting config
Your downloaded source archive may be incomplete...
You should post the relevant parts
I cannot seem to find config.log .. Ran updatedb but nothing.
I downloaded the tar.gz file twice ...but both times I get this error
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:florian.rauh@;web.de]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:46 PM
To: Elliot; Samba Mailing List
Subject:
Hello!
I try to mount an smb share with:
smbmount //filer/$USER ~/filer -o username=$USER
and I get following error message:
"Failed to find real path for mount point"
What does it mean? The mount point is accessible and the owner of the mount
point is USER.
Whith an earlier ve
Hi,
I have a linux box on RH7.3 with samba 2.2.5-1 and cups-1.1.14-15.
I create a cups printer on to this machine with success, It called lptest?
and apparently, when I send a page test it works fine.
But now I want to share It via Samba then I putted the different setting in
smb.conf . I extra
On Monday 28 October 2002 9:59 am, Michael Wisse wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I try to mount an smb share with:
> smbmount //filer/$USER ~/filer -o username=$USER
>
> and I get following error message:
> "Failed to find real path for mount point"
>
> What does it mean? The mount point is accessi
Am Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 10:48 schrieb Elliot:
> I cannot seem to find config.log .. Ran updatedb but nothing.
>
> I downloaded the tar.gz file twice ...but both times I get this error
>
Post the config.log file in your build directory (where you ran configure).
What are your configure pa
>
>
> atom wrote:
> >
> > Well i agree that hiding the special "$" is a good idea.
> >
> > I don't understand how can I parse the smbclient Output wihout the
"Disk"
> > word
> >
>
>
> smbclient -L atomix | sed s/' Disk '//
> Also I noticed you don't care about possible spaces in the share names
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:51:50 -0300
> From: "cyroreal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "samba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "samba-nt-domain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Samba] Winbind with samba PDC
>
> Is it possible to use winbind to aut
Yes, I tried it with the same result.
Michael
> >
> > I try to mount an smb share with:
> > smbmount //filer/$USER ~/filer -o username=$USER
> >
> > and I get following error message:
> > "Failed to find real path for mount point"
> >
> > What does it mean? The mount point is accessible an
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 06:24, Michael Wisse wrote:
> Yes, I tried it with the same result.
>
> Michael
> > >
> > > I try to mount an smb share with:
> > > smbmount //filer/$USER ~/filer -o username=$USER
> > >
> > > and I get following error message:
> > > "Failed to find real path for mount po
Harald Kümmerle wrote:
> Jay Ts wrote:
> > Samba as a PDC. Samba has no limitation (AFAIK) to the number of
> > clients. There are no licensing fees - this isn't Microsoft, you know? ;)
>
> I know, but I thought Microsoft would mess the thing up with the 5 CALs
> on the AD server. :)
Oops, I tho
Matt Gilliam wrote:
>
> I have a small problem...
> All of my windows machines, XP Pro and 98 cannot see my samba server
> running on RH 7.3
> i can do a smbclient -Llocalhost and see all my computers on the network,
> also windows is telling me
> that it is unable to browse the network, but i
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Frank_K=FCster_geb=2E_F=FCrst?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Samba] oplocks and share modes
>Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:49:50 +
>
>On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 07:51:13PM +0200, Frank Küster geb. Fürst wrote:
>>
>> Yes, thanks. Just one more questio
Any ideas where i can get a "things to check" list for performace tuning of Samba
Currently copying 300mb of data since 09:00am this morning and still going ...now 12:20!
100mb full duplex nic on a IBM x232 series dual proc Piii-1.2ghz, 512mb ram, raid 5 - 18.2gb drives
samba
--
mandra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Message: 15
> From: "Elliot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Samba Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:27:50 +0800
> Subject: [Samba] 2.2.6 error
>
> guys .. when i run ./configure for my samba 2.2.6 .. i get this error
> checkin
I have an issue where at odd times, maybe after 3 days, maybe after a
week, people suddenly cant do domain logons. Unfortunately the machine
is 50km away so i'm sure theres more details I can glean once I can
interogate the users a bit more.
Things I have noticed:
Anyone currently logged in can st
if
!helpful == samba list
then
get the fuck off the list
good luck with your lil windows boxes and Linux servers.
I need to allow a REMOTE server user access to his /home/user files.
I realize allowing REMOTE clients is incredibly insecure, but I am
firewalling samba so that only his STATIC
Try an
ifconfig and see if you are getting errors on the NIC first.
Noel
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 28 October 2002
12:38To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Samba] Samba
PerformanceAny ideas
where i can get a "things to check" l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas where i can get a "things to check" list for performace
tuning of Samba
Currently copying 300mb of data since 09:00am this morning and still
going ...now 12:20!
100mb full duplex nic on a IBM x232 series dual proc Piii-1.2ghz,
512mb ram, raid 5 - 18.2gb d
Hi All:
Excuse me for butting in here, but I'm planning a migration from WinNT 4
to Samba in the near future and this thread has caused me to worry a
little.
Take the case that I'm planning: 3 Domains each to its own LAN
(connected via 128k Frame Relay lines to form a WAN) Each domain
currently
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
samba_2_2 CVS branch.
We've got six systems running it with no visible issues.
I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the
direction I should be heading?
Bill
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 04:18:07PM +0100, Noel Kelly wrote:
>
> I think you definitely have a problem with your NIC on the Samba machine. I
> would swap it out and/or change the cable and see if that cures things. By
> the sound of that explanation above it could also be something like a PCI
> d
> -Original Message-
> From: mlh [mailto:mlh@;zip.com.au]
> Also, double check that the nic is in fact running full duplex.
> It's best just to force both sides to full duplex since
> auto-negotiation is so unreliable.
And the really tricky thing about a duplex mismatch is you'll only
Robert,
Suggest you update to the latest stable release 2.2.6, you may find this
problem will go away.
- John T.
On 28 Oct 2002, Robert Stanford wrote:
> I have an issue where at odd times, maybe after 3 days, maybe after a
> week, people suddenly cant do domain logons. Unfortunately the machin
Title: ENC: utilizing smbpasswd with two user ###URGENT###
Hi,
I have a user in Windows (user_windows = eng.calculo).
I would like that this user_windows acess the unix (solairs2.6) as a valid user unix (user_unix=cs02929)
(this problem is because the admintool only create user wi
I'm using samba version 2.2.1a on a linux RH7.2 kernel 2.4.7-10.
I'm having a lot of oplock problems, specially when using office
applications like word.
I would like to know:
1. what is the recommended configuration in version 2.2.1a (oplocks = yes/no
, level2 oplocks = yes/no , kernel oplocks =
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:22:29PM -0300, SALOME Alexandre wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a user in Windows (user_windows = eng.calculo).
> > I would like that this user_windows acess the unix (solairs2.6) as a valid
> > user unix (user_unix=cs02929)
> > (this problem is because the admintool o
Do you have the 'addprinter command' parameter set in smb.conf? If so,
remove it
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 05:18, Kalkoul Morad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a linux box on RH7.3 with samba 2.2.5-1 and cups-1.1.14-15.
>
> I create a cups printer on to this machine with success, It called lptest?
> and ap
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:44 pm, Mike Rambo wrote:
[SNIP]
> scripts run fine on the workstations at login. I'm using a netlogon
> script I found at http://www.0x0a.com/netlogon.php that I've modified to
> handle multiple groups based upon group membership in /etc/group as I
> need. If I run the script
Are you talking about access rights (like write list = @group) ?
I found a few interesting things with groups and security=domain with
winbind:
1. the @group syntax applies to the UNIX group names. To give access to an
NT group, you need to use something like this:
write list = @"WALN
General consensus is to disable oplocks for a hassle free existence
especially with Office apps:
Oplocks = no
Kernel Oplocks = no
Level2 Oplocks = no
HTH
Noel
Also, something Jeremy posted to the list a few days ago:
Ok, as promised, a brief explaination of oplocks, share modes
and locking.
I have a perl script that I'd like to use to create windows 9x login
scripts at login time but I cannot get the process to work right. I have
RedHat 7.3 (actually the k12ltsp v2.1.0 which is a modified RH7.3) set
up as a domain controller which is working well. Manually created login
scripts run fi
Title: Run smbclient in Unix shell script
Hi,
I can run smbclient on Sun Solaris Korn shell command line to access a NT server from an Unix
worksation without problem but always got "session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE"
when run it from a Korn shell script.
Any help or suggestion w
This's my conf file I still have problems but the error message is
different this time, it sounds like (translating it from italian):
"It's impossible to join this machine to the domain. There's a conflict
between the supllied credential and pre existent ones"
P.S. When v3.0 will be releas
When do you get this problem and what are your client settings. Are you
moving an existing account to another machine or the same machine with a
new os?
Nick
Michele Santucci wrote:
This's my conf file I still have problems but the error message is
different this time, it sounds like (tran
Hello,
I used cvs to download and build samba, but it failed to build with error
message:
checking configure summary... configure: error: summary failure. Aborting
config
I used the following download and build process:
(solaris 7 11/99 gcc 3.2 automake 1.7, libtool 1.4.3, gnu make 3.80,
binut
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
>
>
> Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
> samba_2_2 CVS branch.
Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. We hope that this will be our
last update. All samba-team resources are now focussing on getting 3.0.0
readt for
When do you get this problem and what are your client settings. Are you
moving an existing account to another machine or the same machine with a
new os?
Nick
Michele Santucci wrote:
>This's my conf file I still have problems but the error message is
>different this time, it sounds like (tran
I updated from the newest cvs (HEAD) today, and now am unable to make
changes to the group mapping database using smbgroupedit. It has worked
successfully in the past. Using OpenLdap as passdb backend.
The command
smbgroupedit -v
works as advertised and lists all the built
Hi,
I have a network that runs samba 2.2.5 on a Linux box that acts as the
primary server on the network. It is the PDC, WINS, etc.. The Windows
2000 server is nothing more then a box that runs Terminal Services for
Remote Access. Anyway, I know that in Samba any member of the "domain
admin grou
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Nir Livni wrote:
> I'm using samba version 2.2.1a on a linux RH7.2 kernel 2.4.7-10.
Suggest you update to samba-2.2.6. There have been several patches to
locking code in samba since 2.2.1a. The other reply you received is also
good information.
- John T.
>
> I'm having a lo
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
samba_2_2 CVS branch.
Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release.
So there will never be a stable samba again? ;)
We hope that this will be our
last upda
Hi Deryk, thanks for the personal response.
I forgot to mention in the original post that part of my reason for
upgrading to 2.2.6 was to get away from the redhat rpms in the hope that
I could get the log level boosted up some. That part was successful. I
set the log level to 3 (I saw that in man
Yes and No
When i get a getent groups or groups, I only get domain admins. I am a
member of about 10 groups and they aren't being listed.
Does this matter:
winbind uid = 4-4
winbind gid = 5-5
for some reason i am not getting a list of the correct groups but when i
type wbinfo -
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 09:17, Markus Schabel wrote:
> John H Terpstra wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
> >
> >>Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
> >>samba_2_2 CVS branch.
> >>
> >>
> >Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release.
> >
> So the
Sorry, I don't know any more, hopefully one of the samba gurus might have
an explanation for the behavior.
Karen Wieprecht
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I have following configuration :
[global]
workgroup = testing
server string = Samba-Server
security = SHARE
encrypt passwords = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
character set = ISO8859-15
kernel oplocks = No
[printers]
comment =
I am having an issue with NT4 workstations changing their passwords on a
regular basis. I am getting the following error:
Description: Changing machine account password for account WS10$ failed
with the following error:
The handle is invalid.
This does not happen on all the NT4 workstations and
I have Samba 2.2.6 complied against Cups 1.1.16 on a Sparc system running
Solaris 9. Cups has replaced the stock system V lp spooler on this system
(original packages removed.)
Cups working from UNIX command line is A-OK.
I have been working on setting up Samba to play nice with cups. I have
Dear list,
We are experiencing users unexpectedly accessing each others files.
It happens when they try to access files that are called the same and which
is located in an equal file structure under their login drive. Two other
conditions
need to be fulfilled: one of the users needs to have the fi
Hello,
Getting during configure the infamous error: No locking available. Running
Samba would be unsafe solaris
I went into tests folder and tried summary.c. It fails with the above error.
I tried to make the fcntl_lock manually like it tries and got the following:
root@raven:/usr/local/samba/so
I'm running 2.2.6
When daylight savings time changed this weekend I
had to reset all samba sessions as the sessions didn't pick up the time
change.
Copying file from a Windows client to the server
made the filetime off by one hour.
Killing all the same sessions (also restarted smbd
-- not su
Since I posted this over the weekend, I thought I'd throw it out one more
time to see if anyone else might see it and has any ideas on this.
Thanks for your indulgence.
--
Matt
At 08:34 AM 10/26/2002 -0500, you wrote:
At 08:00 AM 10/26/2002 -0500, you wrote:
I've built a new samba server to re
"Collins, Kevin" wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> Excuse me for butting in here, but I'm planning a migration from WinNT 4
> to Samba in the near future and this thread has caused me to worry a
> little.
>
> Take the case that I'm planning: 3 Domains each to its own LAN
> (connected via 128k Frame Relay
Thanks for your help though! :)
-Original Message-
From: Wieprecht, Karen M. [mailto:Karen.Wieprecht@;jhuapl.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:19 PM
To: 'Jennifer Fountain'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues
Sorry, I don't know any more, hopefully on
Hello all.
Our system consists of two linux machines, each running Red Hat 7.1
(kernel 2.4.9-34), using SMB to mount multiple shares hosted by a
Windows 2000 Advance Server. smbclient from Samba 2.2.5 is used to do
the actual mounting.
Over the weekend, a number of files on these SMBFS shares we
On the client machine; Control Panel > Administration Tools > Local
Security Policy > Local Policy > Security Options > Send unencrypted
password to third-party SMB servers = enabled
Michele Santucci wrote:
>>Are the user and machine$ added to your /etc/passwd and smbpasswd files?
>>
>>
>
>all th
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, SALOME Alexandre wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a user in Windows (user_windows = eng.calculo).
> > I would like that this user_windows acess the unix (solairs2.6) as a valid
> > user unix (user_unix=cs02929)
> > (this problem is because the admintool only create user with
Well i checked the www.cpan.org for any samba perl modules and found one:
http://search.cpan.org/author/ALIAN/Filesys-SmbClientParser-2.3/SmbClientPar
ser.pm
than looked at the source and found this line:
if ( $line =~ /^\s+([\S ]*\S)\s+(Disk)\s+([\S ]*)/ )
This module also uses the "Disk" wor
Markus Schabel wrote:
>
> John H Terpstra wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
> >
> >>Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
> >>samba_2_2 CVS branch.
> >>
> >>
> >Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release.
> >
> So there will never be a stable samb
Hello,
My name is Delisa, I have used the website testing technologies here at the Safe
Shopping Network (http://www.safeshoppingnetwork.com) to test your site
(samba.anu.edu.au) for security, usability and performance. You will be pleased to
know that it did quite well. The reason I did the te
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Kris Kelley wrote:
> When I discovered this was happening, I unmounted all SMBFS shares, and
> remounted them. This fixed the problem; all files created now have the
> correct timestamp.
smbfs sets the mtimes itself. Not really sure why it was done like that,
but some commen
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:47:33PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > Been running with this change since friday and it looks good. I can not
> > > find any leaking FDs anymore. The usage of the server has been very low
> > > so I won't know for sure until Monday afternoon.
> > >
> > > Does this
--- "Keith G. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think he's referring to the phenomenon that
> I've seen on way too
> > many technical mailing lists: be a complete
> asshole and you'll get
> > the complete and undivided attention of multiple
> developers and power
> > users, all of of wh
On friday we changed our
smb.conf file to test the security model that uses DOMAIN authenticacion. It
worked fine testing two seperate usernames from Multiple Workstations connecting
to a WORLD access share on the SAMBA server.
I have to say nothing has
changed at all since friday, apart f
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:55:05PM -0500, David Shapiro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Getting during configure the infamous error: No locking available. Running
> Samba would be unsafe solaris
Dunno why you would get this, solaris works fine of course.
Maybe something screwy with your gcc installation?
>
-Original Message-From: Rend, Jon (Jon) %
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: Access Problem connecting from
windows 2000 client to Samba UNIX server Share
On friday we changed our
smb.conf file to test the security model that uses DOMAIN authentic
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Matt Nelson wrote:
> Since I posted this over the weekend, I thought I'd throw it out one more
> time to see if anyone else might see it and has any ideas on this.
I didn't know samba could serve macs. Does the mac speak SMB?
(Long time since I used macs
Hello,
I am running Red
Hat 7.3 Samba 2.26 and winbind. I have been able to join the domain and
test all of the following with these commands. All works great.
winbind -u
winbind -g
getent passwd
getent group
But when I set up a share to test with one domain
user account it just presen
We have installed Samba 2.2.5 under SuSE Linux (kernel 2.4.7) on a z/800
(IBM mainframe) and are witnessing usually high processor usage. The high
usage is associated with one of the clients. The client runs a script on
an OS/2 machine that continuously works its way through a long list of
small f
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:48 am, you wrote:
> Hi Deryk, thanks for the personal response.
>
> I forgot to mention in the original post that part of my reason for
> upgrading to 2.2.6 was to get away from the redhat rpms in the hope that
> I could get the log level boosted up some. That part was succes
We have installed Samba 2.2.5 under SuSE Linux (kernel 2.4.7) on a z/800
(IBM mainframe) and are witnessing usually high processor usage. The high
usage is associated with one of the clients. The client runs a script on
an OS/2 machine that continuously works its way through a long list of
small
Hello, all
I have a problem with my administrator accounts on WinNT with Samba.
When I log in locally as the Administrator, it works as expected - I *am*
the administrator for the machine.
When I log into the domain as Administrator, it works as expected - I log in
as root.
The prolem comes whe
> >
> > Found one more, this file(MTP_UP_PA12.doc) has been open for 6 hours:
>
> Ok, I've found and fixed the problems with 2.2.6 leaking file descriptors
> when kernel change notify is turned on. Unfortunately (or fortunately as
> we can fix this :-) it's a Samba bug, not a Linux kernel bug.
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Markus Schabel wrote:
> John H Terpstra wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
> >
> >>Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
> >>samba_2_2 CVS branch.
> >>
> >>
> >Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release.
^^^
You might want to upgrade to a newer version of samba. This works for
me with samba 2.2.4 and 2.2.6
D. Joe Anderson wrote:
Hi,
The documentation I've read indicates that I should be able to get Samba to
honor the value of the 'workgroup' variable as set from within an included
virtual server con
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:33:22PM -0600, Jennifer Crusade wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running Red Hat 7.3 Samba 2.26 and winbind. I have been able to join
> the domain and test all of the following with these commands. All works
> great.
>
> But when I set up a share to test with one domain use
Sean Angley wrote:
>
> Does anyone has a good reference to tuning Samba performance?
It used to be that you could tune some Samba configuration file
(smb.conf) parameters to get better performance, but AFAIK, all
those are now the defaults. The important thing is to not mess
with them.
If there
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:10:26AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > Found one more, this file(MTP_UP_PA12.doc) has been open for 6 hours:
> >
> > Ok, I've found and fixed the problems with 2.2.6 leaking file descriptors
> > when kernel change notify is turned on. Unfortunately (or
Mike,
In case you still need a configurable login script ...
Add to [netlogon] share:
root preexec = perl /usr/local/samba/lib/genlogon.pl %u %g %m
root postexec = perl /usr/local/samba/lib/genlogoff.pl %u
Good luck,
Uli
---
#!/usr/bin/perl
#
# genlogon.
Here is my scenario; I have a FreeBSD 4.7 Release running
Samba 2.2.6. I am using samba as a PDC. I have installed everything need
including the Win XP Sign or seal registry patch. I added a one XP machine account for one
machine, and it works fine. Logging
in and mounting network drive
The W32/Klez-H virus was detected in attachment (_55673_1002_car2[1].bat) in email
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10/28/02 21:36:47).
Action taken: deleted
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Can anyone tell me what version of GCC and GAS are needed to
compile samba v2.2.5 on a linux machine?
Thanks
Hello,
When I put 'wbinfo -u'
always give me an error, can any one help me ??
==> Error looking up domain users
Thank you so much !
Agus
=
Ikuti polling TELKOM Memo 166 di www.plasa.com dan menangkan hadiah masing-masing R
Hello,
I've got samba 2.2.6 running on my internal network. I'm trying to
connect to my home directory via a win2ksp3 client, and i'm getting the
below error message in my satellite.log file which is the log file
created when i tried to connect.Any suggestions appreciated.
Thanks.
D
I am having problems uploading printer drivers from my WinXP workstation. I
can use my Win2K workstation just fine, but when I try to use the exact same
user ID and access the exact same printer, the New Driver... button on the
XP printer dialog is disabled. The only thing I can think of is permiss
guys .. when i run ./configure for my samba 2.2.6 .. i get this error
$ checking for test routines... configure: error: cant find test code.
Aborting config
I am not sure how to resolve it. I have posted my error log file at
http://www.mutualinterest.com.sg/config.log hope someone can help me
o
Hello,
I have error on compiling time
I tried on HP-UX 11.00 system with gcc version 3.1 to compile samba source
Samba latest version source was dowloaded from www.us1.samba.org/samba/ftp
I attached log file with this error
thank you.
begin 600 samba_make.log.doc
M(R!M86ME#0HO=7-R+VQO8V%L+W-
Am Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 03:56 schrieb Martin Dube:
> Can anyone tell me what version of GCC and GAS are needed to compile samba
> v2.2.5 on a linux machine?
You should use the C-Compiler which is installed on your distribution if it is
not older then 2.95.2 or 3.2.
greetings
Florian Rauh
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:46:53PM -0800, Michael J. Luevane wrote:
> Hello, all
>
> I have a problem with my administrator accounts on WinNT with Samba.
>
> When I log in locally as the Administrator, it works as expected - I *am*
> the administrator for the machine.
>
> When I log into the dom
Am Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 06:58 schrieb Lora:
> Hello,
>
> I have error on compiling time
> I tried on HP-UX 11.00 system with gcc version 3.1 to compile samba source
> Samba latest version source was dowloaded from www.us1.samba.org/samba/ftp
> I attached log file with this error
>
>
> thank y
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Markus Schabel wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote:
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of
samba_2_2 CVS branch.
Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release.
So there will nev
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:17:20PM +1100, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> so I could see some locks from the unix level.
> It worked sorta, I see the locks for big files
> (but not the locks I was expecting), but for little
> files it shows nothing:
>
> # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/mattest.doc
>
[sorry - bit of a belated reply - I have a bit of a backlog to read]
On 23rd.Oct.2002, Linda Walsh asked :
> I recently upgraded my Linux distro to SuSE 8.1 which
> came w/samba 2.2.5.
>
> A feature of the upgrade was that it 'split' the startup
> script for samba from 1 script for _smb_ & _nmb_
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:43:53AM -0700, Chris de
> Vidal wrote:
>
> > OpLocks were indeed causing corruption; we only
> turned
> > them off, made no other changes, and have no more
> > corruption, as I reported yesterday. Wouldn't
> that be
> > a priority 1, "drop
Hi,
I added these lines to smb.conf:
kernel op locks = false
op locks = false
strict locking = true
so I could see some locks from the unix level.
It worked sorta, I see the locks for big files
(but not the locks I was expecting), but for little
files it shows nothing:
100 matches
Mail list logo
