What about the mysql/pgsql backend ??!
ideal for the middle class. (if your intentions are running a pdc/bdc)
Collen.
Edmundo Valle Neto wrote:
Charles Marcus escreveu:
On 5/15/2008 3:40 AM, Esteban Torres Rodriguez wrote:
I'm new here and I have a doubt... I'm work with windows 2003 server
Charles Marcus wrote:
I sure would like to find a *reliable* way to disable ONLY USB STORAGE
devices, but allow things like keyboards and mice...
What have you tried that is unreliable? There are alot of write ups on
various ways of disabling the usbstor driver, I haven't tried them
myself
Hi all,
I set up a Samba server (version 3.0.24) names "Lamp" on a Debian Etch
distribution. It provides a "guest" (guest ok = yes, guest only = yes,
security = SHARE) access to a "share" directory, which works fine.
Indeed, I can access \\lamp\share from a Windows machine (named
"Ginger") wi
hope I'm in the right place, I trying to join a samba server to Active
Directory.
Samba server FreeBSD 6.2
the Active Directory machine is running Windows 2008 Server
When I execute "net ads join -U Administrator" I get the following error
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.8: Undefine
Thanks. I was hoping for some sort of .htaccess to be able to allow or deny
unauthenticated users (XP Home clients -
cannot join the domain) based on their IP.
Would be a nice addition...
Philip
> On 2008-05-15 Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Shares can have ACLs, which restricts by user, but not by I
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:51:12PM +0200, Philip Kloppers wrote:
> Is it possible to restrict access to specific shares by IP? The "Hosts Allow"
> directive is a global one, but is there
> something similar to be more restrictive for "admin" type shares?
Shares can have ACLs, which restricts by u
Is it possible to restrict access to specific shares by IP? The "Hosts Allow"
directive is a global one, but is there
something similar to be more restrictive for "admin" type shares?
Philip
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba
Hello again,
Just an update to see if this might help anyone help me, I did upgrade
the Debian machine to the newest Samba that it could handle, 3.0.24, but
alas I still get the error:
Fetching DOMAIN database
Failed to fetch domain database: NT code 0x1c010002
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Bob Bregant
Mc
The [homes] share is configured similarly to the [home] share, though
one would mount it different:
\\fileserver.ucsc.edu\home for the [home] share
\\fileserver.ucsc.edu\wmodes for the [homes] share
and for users who have the problem, they have the SID problem in
mounting both shares.
On m
The first part of any SID is the domain portion. It should be pretty
constant throughout your domain as I understand things. When dealing
with users and groups, the bit after the last dash is the RID or
relative ID and it must be unique within the domain. Really really
unique! If samba created
Please keep all traffic on the list.
> Where Can I get pbedit (Download) ?
pdbedit is part of the Samba packages.
> I read some docs about pbedit, Is it possible to integrate pbedit with
> SMBLDAPTOOLS ?
I know nothing about smbldaptools; I don't use them at any of my sites.
--
Cons
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:45:51AM -0700, Jack Lauman wrote:
> For some reason the excel file was stripped in my last post. (See
> below). We would appreciate any help we can get on this. Intuit tried
> this on their test server and we don't know whats causing the files to
> open without oplo
For some reason the excel file was stripped in my last post. (See
below). We would appreciate any help we can get on this. Intuit tried
this on their test server and we don't know whats causing the files to
open without oplocks when a second user tries to access the database.
Thanks,
Jack
> I´ve a customer with a problem. They need to apply some policy's in your
> Samba LDAP (SMBLDAPTOOLS) passwords, like this:
> - Passwords Expiration
Yes
> - Minimum lenght
Yes
> - History
Yes
> - Quality of Password
No (at least without hackery)
> - Block after 3 incorrect logon attempts
Hello All,
I´ve a customer with a problem. They need to apply some policy's in your
Samba LDAP (SMBLDAPTOOLS) passwords, like this:
- Passwords Expiration
- Minimum lenght
- History
- Quality of Password
- Block after 3 incorrect logon attempts
Is it possible to do it with the Default Samba sche
Hi,
I hope someone might understand the problem I am seeing. I will simplify the
setup that I have which reproduces the problem:
1) Computer 1 is running Server 2003 with 2 NICS. One is a "WAN" link with IP
address 192.168.1.12. It has a "private" link with IP 10.0.0.12.
2) Computer 2 is runn
Charles Marcus escreveu:
On 5/15/2008 3:40 AM, Esteban Torres Rodriguez wrote:
I'm new here and I have a doubt... I'm work with windows 2003 server
and now i would change to llnux. My doubt regards the share of my
server: to authenticate my users what is better: samba tdb or ldap?
For us is n
On 5/15/2008 8:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> you disable the USB mass storage service in the windows registry.
>
> Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
>
> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\USBSTOR]
> "Type"=dword:0001
> "Start"=dword:0003--- Alter me t
you disable the USB mass storage service in the windows registry.
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\USBSTOR]
"Type"=dword:0001
"Start"=dword:0003--- Alter me to 1 I think
"ErrorControl"=dword:0001
"ImagePath"=hex(2):
I configured Samba with AD through winbind with *. tdb, but I want to
configure samba directly against ldap DP or need to mount a openldap.
Is it possible?
I want to remove *. tdb.
Directly RedHat support:
Correcting the permissions on such files and directories can be a very
difficult task, re
On 5/15/2008 3:40 AM, Esteban Torres Rodriguez wrote:
>> I'm new here and I have a doubt... I'm work with windows 2003 server
>> and now i would change to llnux. My doubt regards the share of my
>> server: to authenticate my users what is better: samba tdb or ldap?
>> For us is not necessary an act
On 5/14/2008, Michael Heydon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Would it be possible to disable USB storage devices
I sure would like to find a *reliable* way to disable ONLY USB STORAGE
devices, but allow things like keyboards and mice...
Anyone?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from th
Michael Heydon wrote:
Jack Lauman wrote:
I compared the open files with one computer in Lacerte vs. two
computers in Lacerte and noticed one thing peculiar: when one computer
is using Lacerte, all files are opened with exclusive+batch oplocks
including Data1i07.dbf, however when 2 computers ar
Hello Gilles,
In your mail from May 12, 2008 (05:47:58) can be read:
G> On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:09:07 +0200, Marcin Kucharczyk
G> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>When system (FreeBSD) is closed unexpectedly tdb files are corrupted.
>>After boot samba tries to start, but because of corrupted tdb files
always ldap.
Esteban Torres Rodríguez
ÁREA DE SOPORTE TÉCNICO - Administración de Servidores
Subdirección de Sistemas Informáticos
Empresa Pública Desarrollo Agrario y Pesquero,
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Rosilene Pagani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 15/5/2008 09:23 >>>
Hi,
I'm new here and I have
Hi,
I'm new here and I have a doubt...
I'm work with windows 2003 server and now i would change to llnux. My doubt
regards the share of my server: to authenticate my users what is better:
samba tdb or ldap? For us is not necessary an active directory, domain,
ecc... I need only a file server and I
sharif islam wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Michael Heydon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[]
Or you can use the above "force group" option to access the files as a group
that does have access.
Well, the problem is, each folder (such as /www/share1, /www/share2)
already has
27 matches
Mail list logo
