On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:35:44AM +1000, Adam Nielsen wrote:
> I just upgraded from Samba 3.0 to 3.2 and found that the old smbd_audit
> module no longer works. This module logs all file accesses (especially
> deletes and renames) into a MySQL database (with a web frontend) and is
> extremely use
Hi all,
I just upgraded from Samba 3.0 to 3.2 and found that the old smbd_audit
module no longer works. This module logs all file accesses (especially
deletes and renames) into a MySQL database (with a web frontend) and is
extremely useful for us as sometimes our users accidentally move things
ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Crow wrote:
> Depending on the version of Samba, it could be that "passdb expand
> explicit = yes" is required. I ran across this in a similar situation
> due to a change in default behaviour.
>
> Alex
Alex,
Thanks for the info, I will investiga
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 23:44 +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Adam Tauno Williams kirjoitti:
> > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 23:06 +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> >> Any hints for samba performance tuning parameters in smb.conf?
> >> current parameters:
> >> First connection (drive map) from windows machines
Adam Tauno Williams kirjoitti:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 23:06 +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Any hints for samba performance tuning parameters in smb.conf?
current parameters:
First connection (drive map) from windows machines is a bit slow, maybe
disabling ipv6 helps for that?
Why not suss out wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale Schroeder wrote:
> David Christensen wrote:
>
> Dale Schroeder wrote:
>
>
> David,
>
> Your netlogon share is more complicated than most.
> Consider initially commenting out all the mask and mode parameters and the
> valid users parameter.
>
Depending on the version of Samba, it could be that "passdb expand
explicit = yes" is required. I ran across this in a similar situation
due to a change in default behaviour.
Alex
--
This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain
confidential information. Unless you are that pe
David Christensen wrote:
Dale Schroeder wrote:
David,
Your netlogon share is more complicated than most.
Consider initially commenting out all the mask and mode parameters and the
valid users parameter.
If it then works, add them back one at a time until it breaks.
Depending on what the gl
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Harry Jede wrote:
> On Dienstag, 18. August 2009 wrote jw:
>> Is this correct behavior, or a bug?
> You should try posix acls. Read the man pages:
> getfacl
> setfacl
> acl
>
> or search this list archiv. Look for "default acl".
>
I have not used ACLs much, but th
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 23:06 +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Any hints for samba performance tuning parameters in smb.conf?
> current parameters:
> First connection (drive map) from windows machines is a bit slow, maybe
> disabling ipv6 helps for that?
Why not suss out where the delay is before cha
Hallo, Dale,
Du meintest am 20.08.09:
> Check that the execute bit is set on the .bat files. I used 755
> permissions with root:root ownership.
That's not necessary. It has to be run (read) under DOS/Windows from a
Windows client, not run under Linux. Therefore 644 is enough (maybe 640
does
Hallo, David,
Du meintest am 20.08.09:
> The preexec script actually creates a netlogon.bat file for each user
> when they log in and sets the file ownership to that of the user
> logging in.
Can DOS/Windows run this batch file? If it's created under Linux maybe
it has Linux LF and not DOS CRL
Any hints for samba performance tuning parameters in smb.conf?
current parameters:
workgroup =
server string = XX
passdb backend = smbpasswd
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
unix extensions = No
load printers = No
Dale Schroeder wrote:
> David,
>
> Your netlogon share is more complicated than most.
> Consider initially commenting out all the mask and mode parameters and the
> valid users parameter.
> If it then works, add them back one at a time until it breaks.
>
> Depending on what the global preexec sc
David,
Your netlogon share is more complicated than most.
Consider initially commenting out all the mask and mode parameters and
the valid users parameter.
If it then works, add them back one at a time until it breaks.
Depending on what the global preexec script does, you may want to
initiall
What is your vbs script suppose to do. Personally, i'M using kixtart scripting
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Perry
Sent: Thursday, 20 August 2009 5:50 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] samba vbscript login script blocked by windows
Hi,
anyone else using a vbs script f
Hi,
anyone else using a vbs script for a login script and getting it blocked
by windows? more specifically, wscript.exe is what's getting blocked.
I tried editing the Windows firewall, but that didn't seem to help. Any
help would be greatly appreciated.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list
Receive the following errors when users authenticate with LDAP schema
file included with Sun DS 5.2:
ERROR<5897> - Schema - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - User error: Entry
"sambaDomainName=,??=???,??=???", attribute
"sambapwdhistorylength" is not allowed
ERROR<5897> - Schema - conn=-1 op
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Christensen wrote:
> I have samba configured so that users have their own netlogon.bat file
> (e.g. %U.bat) and each user has a .bat with their username in the
> netlogon share.
>
> So far I have been unable to get any of the shares that I have
Thanks for the very detailed answer!
For what it's worth, I've found "smbtree -NS" seems to give the output
I'm looking for. Now I'm just looking for a more programmatic
interface to get that same information. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have samba configured so that users have their own netlogon.bat file
(e.g. %U.bat) and each user has a .bat with their username in the
netlogon share.
So far I have been unable to get any of the shares that I have defined
in the batch file to be mou
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 09:34 -0400, Allen Chen wrote:
> Hi, there
> I have a question about Veto files in smb.conf:
> Can we use this option to hidden files not belonging to myself in a
> shared folder?
No, AFAIK, veto files just match the name of the file to some pattern;
it doesn't concern itsel
Hi, there
I have a question about Veto files in smb.conf:
Can we use this option to hidden files not belonging to myself in a
shared folder?
If not, how do we implement this functionality in Samba?
Thanks,
Allen
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions
Hello Sven,
I have the following structure here:
- one PDC talking to RW OpenLDAP
- three BDCs talking to RO OpenLDAP replica
Basically I am using additional BDCs as file servers - and so far it
works fine. Please take a look on "password server" and "passdb
backend" (here you specify the RO repli
Hello, I am trying to figure out how to implement a samba domain in a
number of remote offices around the world with partly bad and often
interrupted WAN connections/VPNs. The goal is to administer the directory
from the central data center.
My obvious choice would be to set up a central server
Thanks very much for the help.
I'm using a private network so I don't need to worry about
authentication security (eg. Kerberos, etc) and because I'm using
Windows Server 2008 I have the option of using SMB or NFS.
I'm serving both a Windows client and a Linux client but with Windows
Server 2008
Ubuntu 8.04 Server 64-bit Edition
Samba 3.0.28a configured as PDC
WinXP - SP2 clients
I am following the instructions in
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/...#magicnetlogon to add domain
users to the winxp clients Power Users group.
Code: autopoweruser.sh
#!/bin/bash
/usr/bin/net rpc group ad
Hallo, John,
Du meintest am 19.08.09:
> Last question then...
> What about NFS versus SMB? Are both about the same speed?
[fullquote deleted]
NFS is faster, but (in my opinion, and without Kerberos etc.) less
secure.
On some machines I had mounted NFS shares from other machines and had
m
Hi,
I am looking forward to successfully join and logon a Windows 7 RTM to
a Samba 3 domain.
After a little googling and experimenting I came to conclusion that
only version 3.3.4 of samba can accept such clients :
- http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/05/31/join-windows-7-to-samba-pdc/
- http://ubuntuforu
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 07:24:08PM -0400, John Klimek wrote:
> What about NFS versus SMB? Are both about the same speed?
Should be, yes. Although for specific operations there might
be differences.
Volker
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
30 matches
Mail list logo
