Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
I'm trying to run an IMAP mail server (Dovecot) in a virtual machine.
However, I do not want the messages stored within the virtual disk. So
- the question was how the virtual machine could access those files.
Dovecot has been setup and tested with NFS. However, when I
Michal Dobroczynski wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Can you specify what NFS features are important to you in such case?
(in other words please define look like NFS)
Regards,
Michal
Oh - you want me to be specific? What fun would that be? ;-)
Ok, specifics...
I'm trying to run an IMAP mail server
Is it possible to make CIFS look like NFS via some configuration/mount
options? What I mean is, from a client point of view, will the mounted
share behave EXACTLY like NFS will?
--
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
I've seen some references to a postscript setting in smb.conf, but the
current version doesn't recognize it. Has this been replaced?
--
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Does Samba/smbfs/cifs support fsync'ing of directories? Are there
particular smb.conf settings to adjust for this?
--
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:38:25 Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is it possible to define file rights, such that -
The file is owned by root, with full privleges on the Linux server.
The file is shared by a group users.
The shared file should be available for read and write
Is it possible to define file rights, such that -
The file is owned by root, with full privleges on the Linux server.
The file is shared by a group users.
The shared file should be available for read and write access.
That part's easy - but now
Deny delete, overwrite, or rename access to
command = lprm -P'%p' %j
[backups]
comment = Backup Disk 1
path = /back1
read only = No
guest ok = Yes
--
--
Daniel L. Miller, VP - Engineering, SET
AM Fire Electronic Services, Inc. [AMFES]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote:
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Hi!
Trying to trace down a problem with printer sharing. I don't see
anything glaringly obvious with my smb.conf. I am using LDAP and CUPS.
Using a Windoze client, accessing a printer I receive the friendly
Access denied, unable
Hi!
Trying to trace down a problem with printer sharing. I don't see
anything glaringly obvious with my smb.conf. I am using LDAP and CUPS.
Using a Windoze client, accessing a printer I receive the friendly
Access denied, unable to connect. Checking the Samba logs, I find:
[2008/11/07
Since all I saw were bugfixes, no feature changes - do we need to
*gently* press the Debian team to use 3.2.2, instead of 3.2.1?
--
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Harvey, Edward wrote:
Hey all.
I have a bunch of linux servers, all using NIS to maintain
username/password/UID/GID information. I'm trying to make the filesystems
browsable from Windows XP, while maintaining correct UID/GID info. It seems this
would be really simple, just let the user
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Ryan Novosielski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Seems to me they should have been a lot more reluctant to freeze on a
point zero release rather than reluctant at this point. I would be
willing to bet that there are a lot of serious problems that would
appear with any
Jason A. Nunnelley wrote:
I'm probably wrong (I usually am) - but my understanding is if there
is a problem with a released package, and the distro team doesn't
want to upgrade to a new upstream version, the responsibility for
repairing those problems lies with the packagers. Based on the
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 05:45:24 pm Daniel L. Miller wrote:
OK, payment in advance: :-) :-) :-)
Wait a minute, let me change currencies
Awe .. forget it! ;-)
I'm assuming my last payment still has me covered - if you need more
retainer please let me
I've almost got it. I swear I've almost got it (and I've been doing a
lot of swearing lately).
I re-built my PDC, starting from scratch. I'm not using the editposix
extensions anymore - I'm using the smbldap tools as shown (I think) in
the Samba by Example.
I really really thought I did
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 02:22:15 pm Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I've almost got it. I swear I've almost got it (and I've been doing a
lot of swearing lately).
Swearing does not help much. :-)
It does too! I haven't broken a single keyboard!
I re-built my PDC
OK, payment in advance: :-) :-) :-)
Wait a minute, let me change currencies
_.-'-._
.' _ _ '.
/ (o) (o) \
| |
| \ / |
\ '. .' /
'. `'---'` .'
'-._.-'
_.-'-._
.' _ _ '.
Daniel Cristian Cruz wrote:
I had a LDAP tree with this structure:
dc=base
+ ou=unit1
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
+ ou=unit2
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
+ ou=unit3
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
...
And I need people from unit1
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Thursday 11 October 2007 22:57, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Are the IDEALX tools necessary for complete integration with LDAP? Or
is the built-in support sufficiently advanced now?
Daniel
What does complete integration with LDAP mean to you?
You
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Thursday 11 October 2007 22:57, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Are the IDEALX tools necessary for complete integration with LDAP? Or
is the built-in support sufficiently advanced now?
Daniel
Daniel,
What function do you believe the IDEALX tools serve? Why do you
Torsten wrote:
Frank Van Damme schrieb:
On 10/11/07, Torsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Van Damme schrieb:
You problem is that the account does not have uid number 0. If it has,
it has a root account on your unix box and you're all set.
o.k, but uid 0 is reserved for root, isn't
Are the IDEALX tools necessary for complete integration with LDAP? Or
is the built-in support sufficiently advanced now?
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Andrew Sherlock-CF wrote:
I wonder if tshark or netstat could be useful here
I don't know the tools, which is why I was asking.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi all!
I've seen a number of posts regarding Samba performance - either
comments about perceived poor performance, or recommended parameter
changes. Instead of some arbitrary buffer numbers, or play with it
until it works, are there any analysis tools that can give quantitative
answers ?
I've been having a miserable time trying to get Winbind working. All of
the literature I've found seems to indicate it just works - which I'd
love - but it hasn't gone that way for me. Because I'm already using
LDAP, it seemed to make sense to use the LDAP support for Winbind. But
Winbind
With only a Samba PDC, with everything defined in LDAP, is there any
requirement for Winbind?
--
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi!
I'm trying to get a Samba-based domain working properly. I'm using an
LDAP backend. Right now all the users have been created, and machine
accounts as well - but some things at the domain level aren't 100%.
Adding new machines usually results in a error, which I get around and
then
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to get a Samba-based domain working properly.
The again portion is because I had another Samba server, which I know
was BADLY misconfigured and I wanted to start from scratch. So I
created a new server, and copied all the entries to create a clean LDAP
29 matches
Mail list logo
