Quoting Roman Muñoz ta...@infonegocio.com:
But XP and Ubuntu keep dropping each other out of domain. Any ideas?
You might not be seeing this, but it is something to think about...
I needed (or chose to) create separate machine accounts for each dual
booted OS. One OS would change the
A while back, Volker sent out the following:
[Hide Quoted Text]
That won't work. Your only chance is Samba 3.3.4 with
HKLM\System\CCS\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters
DWORD DomainCompatibilityMode = 1
DWORD DNSNameResolutionRequired = 0
We are running 3.4.2-0.42.fc11, and I have been noticing some extra
processes sticking around, for lack of a better term.
If I run w on the server I see around 11 users logged on running smbd -D.
Here is an example (with the user name removed):
smb/12 :::10.0.1.7 Fri160.00s
Quoting Bruno MACADRE bruno.maca...@univ-rouen.fr:
Volker Lendecke a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 04:30:41PM +0200, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
Hi,
My problems with Samba continue... I'm very disappointed, i've never
had as problems with Samba before (on my old server with Gentoo/Samba
Quoting Sallow Yang sallow.y...@gmail.com:
Hi,
The following are my steps:
1. Insert a FAT32 format HDD into usb port of Linux PC.
2. After HDD mounted successfully, configure and start samba to share the
HDD.
3. Using Map Network Drive of Windows XP to map the HDD to a windows network
drive.
Quoting Dan Grindstaff d...@oakrun.net:
Hello All,
I have set up samba server 3.0.33-0.fc8 and successfully created a share
accessible by all machines in my workgroup. When I open up network on my
linux box I can see all other machines in the workgroup. I have set up
other shares on other
Quoting John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com:
One thing you can do to try to generate help is to try to debug the
problem yourself. I mean do your logs show anything suspicious when
the failure occurs? If so post that output. Also if you could update
your samba to the current version (3.0.35) and
Quoting Hambleton, Tom tom.hamble...@lmco.com:
I am consistently getting libtalloc.so.1: No such file or
directory when attempting to 'make' any version of samba.
I've tried all of the suggestions from the list archives on this subject.
Using Solaris 9 sparc.
Current versions are:
in
the original request, yet my read of the response is that a create
failed on a path which differed from that in the request.
Assuming that I am mistaken, it would be very helpful if I understood
where I am going wrong in my thinking.
As always, feedback from the list is appreciated.
Jonathon Doran
Quoting Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 09:58:51AM -0700, Lance Gropper wrote:
Hello Jeremy:
Only 4GB RAM...
Try doing the same thing against Samba with a Linux
client (using CIFSFS). If it works correctly then
you are running into a Windows client bug.
would
Quoting John H Terpstra - Samba Team j...@samba.org:
What size limit should we observe for messages to this list?
1) 64 KBytes
I would hope that larger files would be compressed and put on an
ftp/web server.
Or send as attachments to individuals on request.
--
To unsubscribe from this
Could you be running an out of data samba.schema?
Quoting Daniel Spannbauer d...@marco.de:
Hello,
I try to install a PDC with Samba 3.0.23 and openldap 2.3.27.
I can join the domain with a win-xp-Machine, the User-Accounts are in
ldap and looks like the following:
dn:
...
and my apologies for the top post. I wasn't planning on quoting anything.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Quoting Agustin Eguia agustin.eg...@gmail.com:
I already readed the manual and found the information given there
somewhat confusing at least for people who hasn't been working with
samba for a long time. I edited my smb.conf file and added the
following lines :
[records]
vfs objects =
Quoting Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com:
su setenforce 0
For the benefit of others, under Fedora I edit /etc/sysconfig/selinux
to turn this off.
Please recognize the risks you may be adding to your network by
disabling selinux. For some people, this is an acceptable situation
(me
Quoting Shuaib Ilyas (shilyas) shil...@cisco.com:
I am trying to install samba on the RHEL. The installation completes but
after that I get the smbd dead message upon checking the status:
What does the samba logfile say about this? On Fedora (which should have
the same layout as RHEL), the
Quoting steve st...@greengecko.co.nz:
New to this windows domain stuff, sorry ( at my age learning new stuff
can take a while ).
I've set up a domain and joined a couple of XP workstations to is and
all is fine. What I want to do now is to ensure that the users of these
PCs still have
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:41 AM, David
Christensendavid.christen...@viveli.com wrote:
I took a look at the /var/log/message log and see:
with ldap ssl = off ???
Yes, as soon as I enable ldapsam as the password DB, even with ldap ssl
= off, smb keeps trying to do a StartTLS.
Did you put ssl
I'm still working on figuring out why some accesses to profile data
are failing.
We are running 3.3.2-0.33.fc11 (the latest release for FC11).
I saw this in the log file
stat_cache_lookup: lookup succeeded for name [USER/STARTMENU] -
[user/StartMenu]
[2009/07/08 17:39:59, 3]
Quoting Dale Schroeder d...@briannassaladdressing.com:
Jonathan,
Any chance there could be a duplicate user?
getent passwd|grep /user/ would narrow the list down.
Dale
Thanks for the idea, but no. Just one occurrence.
I'm pretty sure the namespace with the collision is the profile.
1) Would it be better to only have the Samba users files on the large
RAID drive, leaving the admin and root homes on the OS drive?
2) If it is, how would I set up for the admin account. For example,
the admin is a user named 'fred' and he will also be logging onto the
Samba server. Should
While I have a moment, I'd like to followup yesterdays post with
another data point. I backed up one user's profile, then went into
the directory and did chmod -R 777 .. The user is able to login,
and access their profile normally. This really makes me believe this
is an
My apologies for the extra post, but I spoke too soon. I'm on my way
out the door to check on another lab, so I'm trying to summarize where
things are.
With 777 permissions and logging set to 4, I still see the
OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION in the logfile. And upon logout and logging back
in
Quoting Doug Coats dcoats...@gmail.com:
Does anybody have a clue what the issue might be? Maybe even a hint as to
what I could look into? Is there more information that I could supply that
would help?
Your choice appears to be between a quick response from someone who
doesn't know what
Quoting Norberto Bensa nbe...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:20 PM, David
Christensendavid.christen...@viveli.com wrote:
Does anyone know what this error means:
[r...@ldap2 samba]# net getlocalsid
[2009/07/07 17:04:00, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smb_ldap_start_tls(600)
Failed to issue the
I am obviously confused about something, and feel like I am chasing
ghosts. Any help or clarification would be appreciated.
When a user logs in we get messages about corrupt recycle bins.
Setting the logging to level 2 for that client, we have errors like:
open_directory: unable to
This week I migrated out main server from Fedora 8 to Fedora 11. It
has been a stressful time, but things are mostly working. Samba and
LDAP weren't really a problem, but I've beat down the list of problems
to something Samba related.
(For the benefit of anyone else going this route, the
27 matches
Mail list logo
