Try appending a dot character to the end and put it in domain_realm
mapping. Let us know.
kinit user@domain.local.
On Oct 13, 2013 11:08 AM, "Danny Fedor" wrote:
> I'm running Samba 4.0.10 on Ubuntu Server 12.04.3 x64
> Samba was installed from source and provisioned with internal DNS as PDC o
Interesting,
Sorry for breaking in on this thread, but I just wanted to say.
Thank you for the registry tip, it solved a problem for me that was
driving me nuts.
Rob
2013/5/22 David Noriega :
> Ahh that did it. The CentralProfile value was from a previous server
> layout and thus it co
ser.DOSATTRIB has a string of characters assigned to it.
security.NTACL, system.posix_acl_access and system.posix_acl_default are
the same on both servers.
I've manually copied over the attributes using setfattr -n
--value= and I'm still getting the same issue.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe f
On 17/04/2013 16:32, Rob Beard wrote:
Hi folks,
I've got a bit of an issue with roaming profiles and I wondered if someone
might be able to help please? :-)
We've started rolling out Samba 4 across our network. Currently it's on 3
of our 4 sites, one site has two Samba server
and setfattr will be helpful in sorting
this out.
Good luck,
Ricky
Thanks Ricky,
I was using the -A and -X switches on rsync, but I'll do a bit more
reading up on rsync, I'm guessing I've possibly missed something.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following UR
ese issues we're a bit
stuck.
If anyone could help, or maybe suggest another way of syncing the roaming
profiles between the servers that would be great.
Thanks in advance,
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Rob Townley wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:38:13PM -0600, Rob Townley wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Fe
On Thursday, February 21, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:38:13PM -0600, Rob Townley wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
>> >>
>> >
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:30:37AM +0100, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
>>
>> What we have here is a problem of two incompatible text fields, and
>> it does not make a difference if that incompatibility is a filenames
>> in a file system or some tab
and yes, i have "some" special characters in filenames, but only the allowed
> ones.
> and no, i dont have problems with windows and unix with these files.
>
>
> Louis
>
>
>>-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>>Van: rob.town...@gmail.com
>>[mailto:samb
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jonathan Buzzard
wrote:
> On 18/02/13 19:16, Ray wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suppose this question must have been posted a hundred times, but
>> Google brings up nothing useful:
>>
>> Consider "The Wall" from Pink Floyd in an MP3 collection. There's "In
>> The Flesh.m
This is why it is smart to use a dedicated Firefox profile for banking,
another profile just for email, another profile for web browsing.And of
course, another dedicated profile for internal systems only such as
for managing dd-wrt, switches, iLO, DRAC, webcams, webmin and swat.
Safer is to h
Win7 by default will only use 445
On Friday, February 1, 2013, Morgan Toal wrote:
> OK,
>
> How do I confirm the sid that the windows box is using?
>
> I can get the domain sid from net getlocalsid
> I can get the user sid of a local user no problem
>
> In reference to unjoining and rejoining...
Samba is set to use rfc2307, but no
uidNumber attribute exists for an object, the UID number gets allocated.
But once a uidNumber attribute is set, and the allocation has already
taken place, the allocated UID is used instead. I can't imagine that
this is the desired behaviour with rfc2307
this form of RID mapping,
even though previous versions did support it.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
as seen by
Samba, which as far as I know are used very little within Samba, where
the objectSid is used instead.
Of course, it could be that I have a massive misunderstanding of the
internals of Samba4, and there is a reason why this functionality wasn't
brought across.
Rob
--
To unsubs
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> On 12/30/2012 07:10 PM, Achim Gottinger wrote:
>
>> As you have noticed, we are very good at adding DNS records, but never
>>> remove the old ones. What you have done seems reasonable, if you have
>>> renamed the site, removing the remain
Sorry for the late reply - was running it through testing in our
environment. But so far it seems to be working a treat! Thanks for this,
much appreciated.
Rob
On 15/12/12 16:42, Thomas Simmons wrote:
Hello Rob,
You can enable anonymous binding to AD by creating the attribute
"dsHeuri
On 15/12/12 13:31, Achim Gottinger wrote:
It might work if you give Anonymous full read Access to the cn=Users
branch via AD User and Group management.
How is it possible to do this from the Samba4 server? Unfortunately
Windows is out of the question here, because this will be part of
Karoshi S
access to LDAP rather than needing the dedicated user,
which brings with it security holes.
On 14/12/12 18:03, Rob McCorkell wrote:
In our current testing environment, we are using nslcd to get user and
group information from the Samba4 LDAP server, using the last part of
objectSid as uidNumber
ess scarce) documentation shows that to do
that requires each entry be specifically set to allow this, which seems
to be more hassle than it is worth. Any help on this would also be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructio
Precisely what ldap attribute are you setting user id numbers in AD? You
may want to check. There are numerous attribute names that include uid and
gid, but you need the correct one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mail
2008, and I recommend it highly.
--Rob
Rob LaRose systems administrator
imaginary forces | 530 west 25th street | new york | p 646.486.6868 |
www.imaginaryforces.com <http://www.imaginaryforces.com/>
On 4/16/12 9:18 AM, "Christopher Davis" wrote:
>I am trying to get
It would be very helpful if the protocol is
displayed in smbstatus.
Vielen Dank :-)
Rob
On 3/28/12 3:08 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:13:34PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:03:49PM -0400, Rob Marshall wrote:
Hi,
I've installed 3.6.3
Never mind...I ran Ethereal and started a capture
and right in the "Protocol" column it said: SMB2.
So, problem solved.
Thanks,
Rob
On 3/27/12 9:31 PM, Rob Marshall wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Well, since I'd rather not have to look at the
actual negotiation, anything would help. I&
Hi Jeremy,
Well, since I'd rather not have to look at the
actual negotiation, anything would help. I'm
just a little surprised there isn't some sort
of way to check it...And by offering a "low
debug-level message" are you saying that there
is one? Or that you could add
Hi,
I've installed 3.6.3 on a Linux system (SLES 10) and I
am connecting from a Windows 7 VM running on my Mac. I
added "max protocol = SMB2" to my smb.conf and restarted
Samba. How can I check and verify that the protocol I'm
using is actually SMB2?
Thanks,
Rob
--
To u
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Chris Weiss wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Andrew Lyon
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a Microsoft application (SCCM) which I need to grant access to
> > a samba share, however the service which reads the files can only
> > authenticate using the compu
for any tips.
--Rob
Rob LaRose systems administrator
imaginary forces | 530 west 25th street | new york | p 646.486.6868 |
www.imaginaryforces.com<http://www.imaginaryforces.com/>
This e-mail is intended only for the named person or entity to which
The files aren't locked as I can modify them Photoshop? It's only the "Rotate"
shell extension that won't work until _after_ Photoshop has opened and
re-written the file. However, I do suspect a locking related problem...
--- Original Message ---
From: Joh
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Sharik M wrote:
> Dear Friend,
>
>
> Is it possible to deactivate pre-authentification on the Linux (or
>
> Windows) side to avoid these messages ?
>
> Becouse i am getting lot of erro in windows 2003 domain.
>
> Hi,
>
> When validating users on my Linux system aga
Hi List,
I have an unusual problem concerning the Windows XP "Rotate" image
explorer shell extension. I have a share called "Archives" defined with
a number of sub-directories. Whilst I have read/write permission to all
directories, I am unable to use the Windows XP "Rotate Clockwise" or
"Rotat
FusionInventory.org OPSI.org
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:47 PM, wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok, i get it... so both options are horror...
>>
>> so basically i have to use samba4 for the policies and all.
>> and use samba3 on a different machine for the network browsing and
>> printing.
>> must be do-able...
e
bunch of printers, rather than manually wading through a bunch of clicky
windows re-doing them all one-by-one...)
Thanks for any assistance,
- rob.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:26 AM, John Hendrix wrote:
> Hi all
>
> The symptom is:
>
>> C:\Windows\system32>net USE z: \\10.10.23.219\share /USER:SMBUSER
>> [password]
>>
>> System error 1326 has occurred.
>>
> My situation
>
> I am using VirtualBox. Windows 7 Home is the host. Fedora 13 is the gu
Hi Ben,
Which version of AD are you using? We had no luck integrating Solaris Samba w/
AD 2008 last year, and were forced to use a third-party authentication product
called Centrify DirectControl to facilitate.
This may have changed by now — have you opened a support case with Oracle?
--Rob
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Masopust, Christian
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> as our Windows DCs will switch off DES encryption in the near future I
> have to change our
> Samba-Server to AES encryption.
>
> If I understand it correctly I have to change kerberos-configuration to
> new encryption t
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
wrote:
> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7
>
>
> I would be pretty sure that if Windows 7 doesn't work with Samba 3.0.x that
> Windows 2008 won't either. Rather than compiling samba 3.4 or 3.5 from
> source I would go with Fedora Core 11 (sa
Please elaborate on why you do not like OpenLDAP and SambaPDC same machine?
RedHat sponsored FreeIPA.org does Samba, 389 ldap, Dns, pki all on one
machine. So does win ads.
On 7/31/10, John Drescher wrote:
>> I wish to establish domain controller based on Centos 5.x.I am
>> considering belo
Depends on where you're talking about your users authenticating, but it
sounds like you need a:
winbind use default domain = yes
in your smb.conf.
- rob.
On 07/13/2010 02:00 AM, Philipp Braband wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a problem with my samba and winbind
nistrative Templates:Printers:Always
render print jobs on the server
Windows documentation says this defaults to disabled, but we have found
this to be (at least partially) untrue for W2k8 - if you need it
disabled then disable it explicitly.
Hopefully that works for you...
- rob.
On 07/12/201
it if
anyone can help me find what works!)
thanks,
- rob.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Sharing of complete$ drives may no longer be a default in WinVista / 2008.
Some of the other$ shares such as IPC$ and ADMIN$ may be needed to
manage your Linux shares remotely using windows compmgmt.msc and
remote registry.
http://book.opensourceproject.org.cn/sysadmin/samba/sambao3rd/opensourc
(should have) changed.
I think my machine is haunted... *sigh*
- rob.
On 06/30/2010 03:26 PM, Rob Moser wrote:
> Hello folks.
>
> Brand new 3.5.4 install of samba, on a brand new redhat 5.5 install,
> trying to connect to a windows domain and allow AD users access. I used
> a s
but figured its better
to put too much in than leave too much out.
Any suggestions would be most appreciated; thanks.
- rob.
[r...@dev-acadprtsrv3 log]# kinit -V rmoser
Password for rmo...@students.froot.nau.edu:
Authenticated to Kerberos v5
[r...@dev-acadprtsrv3 log]# klist -5
Ticket c
I did see the manual mapping option in
wbinfo, but we have a fairly dynamic user base, so manual configuration
didn't seem viable.
Thanks for your help though! Hopefully someone can tell us both how to
get the automatic mapping working...
- rob.
On 06/23/2010 12:04 PM, Gaiseric Va
ps = no
winbind nested groups = yes
winbind use default domain = yes
So it is using a default domain (the correct one; I checked) and I'm not
just running out of gids. My various /var/log/samba/log.* files contain
almost exactly nothing from the time of the transaction.
Any hel
ing this policy not
configured is the same as disabling it. They lie.
- rob.
On 06/08/2010 11:43 AM, Rob Moser wrote:
> Some additional information on this problem:
>
> I set up wireshark to do a packet trace of the connection attempt. I'm
> not familiar enough with
ll log or the full packet trace - way too much
for a mailing list. If no one recognises the problem from this much
then I'll attach full data to a bug report.)
Thanks for any suggestions,
- rob.
On 06/07/2010 03:51 PM, Rob Moser wrote:
> I have a redhat EL5 samba server hosting a collec
enerates the
error above.
Any suggestions? Thanks,
- rob.
# testparm
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
Unknown parameter encountered: "idmap domains"
Ignoring unknown parameter "idmap domains"
Processing section "[printers]"
Processing section &
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Gerard Hooton wrote:
> Can anyone help me with this, I am badly stuck on this?
>
> //Ger
>
>
> --
> Gerard Hooton.
> Department of Microelectronic Engineering U.C.C.
> Butler Building,
> Enterprise Centre,
> North Mall.
> Cork.
>
> Tel: +353 21 4904576
> Fax: +353
ying to move tdb files across machines in the
first place? If I wipe them clean and just copy the configuration
files, will I keep all of my configuration?
Thanks for any advice,
- rob.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 03 May 2010 23:25:13 -0400
> Mike Leone wrote:
>
>> I am confused (nothing new there ...). I have 2 Ubuntu 9.10 Samba
>> servers. I am trying to mount a share from the other (i.e., "workhorse"
>> is trying to mount a share on "dual-boot
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Andrew Malton
wrote:
> I want to (continue to) use Samba code to obtain data needed by my Linux
> client. This is currently done by calls into Samba's libraries.
> Unfortunately the resulting rpc traffic is unencrypted. I think this has
> to do with the configur
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 01:35:12PM -0600, d...@briannassaladdressing.com
> wrote:
>> Alex,
>>
>> I've been a victim of this since Day 1. After a lot of reading and
>> emailing, it comes down to this. libkrb5-3 version 1.8x by default
>>
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 1:35 PM, wrote:
> Alex,
>
> I've been a victim of this since Day 1. After a lot of reading and
> emailing, it comes down to this. libkrb5-3 version 1.8x by default
> disallows DES encryption. /etc/krb5.conf can be changed to allow weak
> encryption, but as it relates to
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Wilkinson, Alex <
alex.wilkin...@dsto.defence.gov.au> wrote:
> Anyone ?
>
> -Alex
>
>0n Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:00:57PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>According to this bug report:
>>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
ng
glaringly wrong, has seen this before, or can give me any more avenues of
investigation.
Many thanks in advance,
Rob.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Kris Lou wrote:
PDC Results:
SID for local machine KIF is: S-1-5-21-1297059763-2273326489-166094
SID for domain MLC is: S-1-5-21-957249707-1866601452-441284377
Openfiler Results:
SID for local machine VADER is: S-1-5-21-2859034502-3981372097-2611941478
SID for domain MLC is: S-1-5-21-9572497
What does your 'net getdomainsid' or 'net getlocalsid' output look like?
Kris Lou wrote:
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the quick reply - Here it is (mostly with some cut and paste).
CentOS 5.4
Samba 3.2.15
dn: cn=Domain Admins,ou=Group,dc=themusiclink,dc=net
description: Netbios D
Kris Lou wrote:
I've checked my ldif's - the groups exist, the users exists as
memberids, but it looks like samba is only checking the gid?
Can you post the LDIFs of your groups (you can edit out any
incriminating evidence ;)? Sounds like your groups are lacking correct
sambaSID or sambaGro
Michael Lueck wrote:
When Etch came out, the Samba packages were so bad that I ended up
trying Ubuntu (7.04). It worked great!
That's just silly. I use Ubuntu on my desktops and servers mostly
because I prefer the extra fit-and-polish it has to Debian. But I've
used both and the packages th
ehalf Of Gaiseric Vandal
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:30 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Can only log on to domain, not local machine
On 01/12/10 21:14, Rob Feldman wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Yeah, the behavior you describe is what I expected but not what I'm
Alberto Moreno wrote:
Is possible to sync both ldap servers every time I change something
in ldap? or a better way to do it?Alberto Moreno wrote:
You could probably do this with OpenLDAP's syncrepl replication
facility. You may also wish to consider combining everything into one
LDAP database,
he default setting to keep the
last 10 logins is intact.
My setup is the same as yours, XP clients of domain with a Samba PDC. I
maintain another similar system at work which works fine.
I really appreciate the effort -- any other ideas?
Thanks,
Rob
-Original Message-
From:
Used Administrator login on XP client to grant domain users rights to log on
to client machine (such as when offline). All attempts to log on to local
machine fail authentication (error "System could not log you on. Check user
name and domain..."). Everything else works fine, including logon to dom
Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I don't think one user in LDAP could be in two different domains-
each user has to have a distinct SambaSID entry.
Ooomph! *slaps forehead*. You're right. That's what I get for posting
before I've had my coffeee.
I stand by my original statement that OpenLDAP's
Alberto Moreno wrote:
Is possible to sync both ldap servers every time I change something
in ldap? or a better way to do it?Alberto Moreno wrote:
You could probably do this with OpenLDAP's syncrepl replication
facility. You may also wish to consider combining everything into one
LDAP database,
Kacper wrote:
The file exists there but is of course read-only. Does samba need to
write to this secret file or why doesn't it want to open that file?
If you want your root filesystem read-only (like, say, to boot your
server from a CD-ROM or embedded device) then you can just copy this
fi
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Michael Adam wrote:
> Hi Dominic,
>
> Dominic Gamble wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can't get access to any shares when running "smbclient //DUCK/test -U
>> Dominic". I'm getting the message:
>> tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
>>
>> I'm pretty sure it's auth
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:21 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have raised this question on the kerberos mailing list, but have been told
> that Samba has it's own behavior regarding SRV lookups.
>
> My configuration uses the following :
> dns_lookup_realm = false
> dns_lookup_kdc = false
>
> [realms]
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Rajesh Ghanekar
wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am using samba-3.2.11-0.1.145 in my setup. I have multiple domain
> controllers
> for a domain. I am confused on do I need to edit /etc/krb5.conf or not. I am
> using
> MIT kerberos (krb5-1.4.3-19.34) on SLES10.
>
> Here is wha
i am in a mixed win2000 and win2003 R1 ActiveDirectory environment.
Have always had ntlmv2 server and client required. LM and NTLM have
always been rejected. That is how it has been for 10 years.
Mounting from CentOS 5 to the windows servers has not been an issue
for years. However, using ADS c
nbind files
group: winbind files
I did some googling for this problem, and found a few instances that
sounded similar, but I didn't see any solutions. Thanks in advance for
any assistance you might be able to provide.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
Of over 100 LADP Samba installation I have completed over 80%
successfully use:
uid='username',ou=People,ou=Users,
uid='machine',ou=Computers,ou=Users,
Same here, though I use
uid='username', ou=people,
cn='machine', ou=hosts,
and make the object str
es
sambapwdhistorylength, sambalockoutthreshold, sambamaxpwdage should be
included, in our case, they are not.
Thanks for any assistance,
Rob Mottishaw
Rob Mottishaw wrote:
Receive the following errors when users authenticate with LDAP schema
file included with Sun DS 5.2:
ERROR<5897> - Schema - conn
e are not among those listed in the schema file for
SAMBA 3.0.x. Is there an updated schema file or a way to configure the
authentication to remove the verification of these attributes?
Thank you,
Rob Mottishaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 05:46:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 07:34:51PM -0500, Himanshu Thapar wrote:
> > Thank youOkay..can you explain how can I go about with hdparm or
> > guide me to an appropriate link. Also how will this help me in diagnosing
> > the curre
way to get samba / net ads join to just use the existing kerberos
setup / keytab and NOT try to create a new account?
--Rob
On Mar 18, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Edward Irvine wrote:
Rob,
Hi Samba people!
I'm trying to use SAMBA (the version included with Solaris 10)
with an AD.
NET
reate or modify a keytab file that I can find. I have use kerberos
keytab = true in my smb.conf file, but I can't see that it actually
does anything.
Can anyone steer me in the right direction here? I've been chasing
this for over a month.
--Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this
Don't know if this helps, but you _can_ add a description in CUPS and
Samba clients will display it.
On 2/13/09, HB wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a Samba 3.2.7 acting as a PDC for files and printers sharing.
> All the print configuration is ok and network printers shared by Samba and
> managed by CUPS a
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Kathy wrote:
>
> # first statement is old and may not be obsolete but we still keep it
> just in case
> oplocks = no
> kernel oplocks = no
> level2 oplocks = no
>
If you have 'oplocks = no', then it doesn't matter what 'kernel oplocks' or
'level2 oplocks' are set
Do you have a complete sambaDomain record in your LDAP and is it at
the root level of the LDAP structure?
On 12/19/08, Graham Seaman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to set up samba with ldap authorization on a windows network.
> I have samba running on one linux host, and openldap on another. I have
Caveats--virtual machines doing nat are, by definition, on a separate
subnet. And your friends can share without a hostname--just access by
IP address! (ACLs apply of course)
On 12/11/08, Uriel Avalos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @Rob@ - I was just thinking in terms of keeping it si
On 12/11/08, Uriel Avalos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @Rob@ - I was just thinking in terms of keeping it simple. One less thing I
> need to worry about. On top of that, my computers and
> any friend's computers will work right out the box (for the most part. I
> imagine, if
There are no options that aren't a security nightmare other than using
different hostnames for each OS.
On 12/11/08, Frank Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> We are facing a boring trouble with multi OB boot machines
> that access to our samba server.
>
> All machines authenticate to sa
You shouldn't need one, but running one won't really hurt either.
On 12/11/08, Uriel Avalos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. All, I've been reading the docs but I'm not too sure when I should run a
> WINS server.
>
> Just to confirm, I only need a WINS server if I have more than one
> workgroup? o
Sounds like something at the physical layer. Try a different NIC on
the server. Run some network diagnostics.
On 12/10/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it's reliable and Samba is working on another machine just fine. That
> box is running Samba 3.0.20 on Slackware. This
On Tue, August 5, 2008 8:54 pm, Chris wrote:
> This used to work.
>
> "net groupmap list" shows that the mapping is there, and the SID looks
> correct.
>
> When I check the user after logging into the Windows 2000 workstation
> with WHOAMI.EXE /GROUP the DOMAIN\Admins group is listed, but when I
>
On Tue, August 5, 2008 8:12 pm, Michael Heydon wrote:
> This is what happens when you rename a user, it is the same in XP and
probably 2k as well. The only way that I know of to really change a
No, this does not happen on Windows 2000. Note that I'm still running
Windows 2000 because it runs ve
Symlinks are causing my the Linux CIFS v1.47 client to fail with
Samba 3.0.24 with Unix Extensions turned on. The messages I am getting
are in the syslog are:
Jul 30 21:22:05 dagda kernel: [88044.98] CIFS VFS: server not
responding
Jul 30 21:22:05 dagda kernel: [88044.98] CIFS VF
Why is that when you create a share, the default is 'msdfs root = yes'?
Also, why is that a share that is set 'msdfs root = yes' -- or, rather,
a share that does /not/ set 'msdfs root = no' -- advertises that it is a
DFS root to the Linux CIFS client, /even /when 'host msdfs = no'? This
sounds li
Hi everyone--
I've worked with many, many CAD, CAM and PLM products including AutoCAD,
CATIA, I-DEAS, UG/NX, 3DStudio Max, Teamcenter, etc. for many, many years
and consider myself to be an expert in performance, scalability and
reliability of these systems.
Most likely, your problems are not spe
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Fabio Muzzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When a user logs on, I would like to run a script that modifies firewall
> rules based on the group that the user belongs to (this determines if he
> has internet access or not) and based on the workstation's IP address
> (
Copied to list. (Forgot to hit 'Reply All'_
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Rob Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can ping each server's IP from the other server. The following nmblookup
>> commands both work:
>
>
> Hi, Misty:
>
> The all-imp
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I converted our networks to samba a decade or more ago, I started
> out by trying to crack all our user passwords by brute force, but I
> could only get about 90% of them in any reasonable time frame. So,
Wow. *Only* 90
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:54 PM, William W. Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was setting up Samba on an OpenSuSE 10.3 i386 computer.
>
> At the last minute I decided to enter a NetBIOS Hostname, big mistake.
While this may be a question better suited to the OpenSUSE list than this
one, you
SWAT reports it as version 3.0.20.
I am a relative novice on Samba configuration, and have only used SWAT
to create the share.
Rob
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:15:28AM +0100, Rob Sharp wrote:
Is there something special you have to configure server-side for WinXP
l you have to configure server-side for WinXP
machines to access the share reliably? I've tried restarting the Samba
services but it appears to have made no difference.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rob Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Files over 4GB not listing properly. Cannot get
CIFSworking.
To: Matt Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Also, I cannot mount the samba share usin
1 - 100 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
