When mounting a Windows share within Linux the noatime option seems to
be ignored. I use the following command
mount -tsmbfs -ousername=user,noatime //192.168.0.12/eclipse /mnt/tmp
Each cat /mnt/tmp/testfile updates the last access time regardless if
noatime specified or not.
I'm running smbmoun
We have an install with sambe 3.0.10 (RHEL 4.3) server and clients. Server is
security=ADS , and recently we had to set restrict workstation login in our
windows domain. On linux clients (joined to domain) we are having issues with
smbmount giving NT_STATUS_INVALID_WORKSTATION errors, but smbc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As the Subject line discribes nearly all features/possibilities of
interaction bewteen Windows and *nix I will get in detail now ;)
I want to login on a linux-machine an get my home from a Windows share.
On the one hand I use a Windows 2003 RC2
Hi @all!
I'm new to this list and neither a samba nor a Windows specialist.
That said: We have some linux servers mounting windows shares. The
problem is that reading files on the share changes the journal / USN
on the Windows side. Now our backup guys are backing up a lot of stuff
that hasn't re
Hallo, Günter,
Du meintest am 12.05.08 zum Thema Re: [Samba] smbmount deprecated - what about
Windows 9x?:
>> "sec=lanman" seems not to be necessary (or outdated).
>> "man mount.cifs" (Samba 3.0.28a) doesn't show the option "lanman"
>> for &q
Hi Helmut,
Am Montag, 12. Mai 2008 schrieb Helmut Hullen:
> Hallo, Günter,
>
> Du meintest am 12.05.08 zum Thema Re: [Samba] smbmount deprecated - what
> about Windows 9x?:
>
> >> smbfs is deprecated and will be removed from the 2.6.27 kernel.
> >> Please m
Hallo, Günter,
Du meintest am 12.05.08 zum Thema Re: [Samba] smbmount deprecated - what about
Windows 9x?:
>> smbfs is deprecated and will be removed from the 2.6.27 kernel.
>> Please migrate to cifs.
>> Can I use "smbmount" even with kernel 2.6.27 (or newer)? M
Am Montag, 12. Mai 2008 schrieb Helmut Hullen:
> Hallo,
>
> I've just installed Kernel 2.6.25.2 - works fine.
>
> But now when I use "smbmount" for mounting shares from my Win9x clients
> the system (kernel) tells me
>
> smbfs is deprecated and will be removed from the 2.6.27 kernel. Please
Hallo,
I've just installed Kernel 2.6.25.2 - works fine.
But now when I use "smbmount" for mounting shares from my Win9x clients
the system (kernel) tells me
smbfs is deprecated and will be removed from the 2.6.27 kernel. Please
migrate to cifs.
But at least Win9x seems not to like cifs.
Hello All,
Here is the problem definition:
* I have a Windows XP SP2 system (part of a Samba NT domain). The
system has a share created in its local disk which has read access for
everyone.
* I have a Linux (SuSE 9.3) system.
* Using PuTTY, I create a SSH tunnel from the Windows XP to Lin
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Server Gremlin wrote:
> The uid= and gid= parameters are being ignored, so I
> can't change the ownership to anything that my local workstation user
> can work with.
Normal when the CIFS Unix extensions are negotiated (man mount.cifs).
Between controlling unix extensions
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Server Gremlin wrote:
> What are CIFS Unix Extensions?
man smb.conf
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Chris Smith wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Server Gremlin wrote:
What? I'm running the latest version of Ubuntu (Feisty Fawn, 7.04
Desktop Version) and nothing of the sort appears anywhere in the man page.
Nothing I can do about that.
Although it hasn't been a secret that smbf
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Server Gremlin wrote:
> What? I'm running the latest version of Ubuntu (Feisty Fawn, 7.04
> Desktop Version) and nothing of the sort appears anywhere in the man page.
Nothing I can do about that.
Although it hasn't been a secret that smbfs has been, at best, "out o
Chris Smith wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Server Gremlin wrote:
When I mount the share
with smbmount using the exact same credentials, I mysteriously can't
write to it. I get "Permission Denied". Can someone please clue me in
to what could be so different about smbmount?
man smbm
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Server Gremlin wrote:
> When I mount the share
> with smbmount using the exact same credentials, I mysteriously can't
> write to it. I get "Permission Denied". Can someone please clue me in
> to what could be so different about smbmount?
man smbmount
Maybe this:
"WAR
Hey everyone,
I have an SMB/CIFS share on a Samba Server that I am trying to mount on
a workstation via the smbmount command. When I just connect to the
share using smbclient everything works fine. When I mount the share
with smbmount using the exact same credentials, I mysteriously can't
w
Am Montag, 7. Mai 2007 21:42 schrieb Chris Smith:
> On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
> > The files are on a W98 system for historical reasons and they are
> > being slowly migrated off. However, the reason I can't just move them
> > is because I'm using Windows programs on the legacy sys
On Mon, 07 May 2007 20:41:47 +0100 Tom Crummey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does the W98 box have to be the server? Can't you make the disk
> from the Linux system available as a share, mount it on the W98 box
> and move the files from the W98 local drive to the share?
Because there isn't a
On Mon, 07 May 2007 20:41:47 +0100 Tom Crummey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does the W98 box have to be the server? Can't you make the disk
> from the Linux system available as a share, mount it on the W98 box
> and move the files from the W98 local drive to the share?
Because there isn't a
On Mon, 7 May 2007 15:42:16 -0400 Chris Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
> > The files are on a W98 system for historical reasons and they are
> > being slowly migrated off. However, the reason I can't just move
> > them is because I'm using Windows
On Mon, 7 May 2007 23:28:10 +0200 Volker Lendecke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:55:26PM +0100, John G Walker wrote:
> > But thanks all the same for taking an interest. I suppose there's
> > always a chance that off-the-wall suggestions will work, and I'd
> > rather hear
On 2007/05/07 23:28 (GMT+0200) Volker Lendecke apparently typed:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:55:26PM +0100, John G Walker wrote:
>> But thanks all the same for taking an interest. I suppose there's
>> always a chance that off-the-wall suggestions will work, and I'd rather
>> hear a hundred sugge
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:55:26PM +0100, John G Walker wrote:
> But thanks all the same for taking an interest. I suppose there's
> always a chance that off-the-wall suggestions will work, and I'd rather
> hear a hundred suggestions that won't work than miss one that will,
File concrete bug repor
On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
> The files are on a W98 system for historical reasons and they are
> being slowly migrated off. However, the reason I can't just move them
> is because I'm using Windows programs on the legacy systems. Some I
> wrote myself, in Visual Basic, so I can't b
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:19:29 -0400 Chris Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
> > I have a W98 machine that I need to share files with
> > other machines on the network, and no amount of wishful thinking
> > will change that.
>
> Maybe useful thinking ca
On 2007/05/07 18:21 (GMT+0100) John G Walker apparently typed:
> On Mon, 07 May 2007 09:00:31 -0500 "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:
>> > As far as I understand it, Windows 98 doesn't use CIFS.
>> Support for netbios transport was added in cifs.ko I think around
>> 2.6.15
> So this would mean
On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
> I have a W98 machine that I need to share files with
> other machines on the network, and no amount of wishful thinking will
> change that.
Maybe useful thinking can. Like how about transferring the files that are on
the W98 system to a CD or Flashdri
No offense, but it sounds like you are venting about something that
wasn't enabled for the packages in your particular distro of choice. If
so, it seems to me that this is the wrong venue to vent. I would suggest
contacting the vendor, distro maintainer and/or package maintainer with
your conce
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 01:36:26PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> "I" don't file bugs on samba because it's all over my head. I'm not a
> developer.
Just to assure you: "Over my head" is just a false
assumption. We might ask you to provide log files and
network traces, and we might ask you to update
On 2007/05/07 10:44 (GMT-0500) Gerald (Jerry) Carter apparently typed:
>> On 2007/05/07 13:46 (GMT+0100) John G Walker apparently typed:
>> I think SUSE is saying the same thing as other distros. They
>> prefer to give you maintained but dysfunctional CIFS over
>> functional but unmaintained net
On Mon, 07 May 2007 09:00:31 -0500 "Gerald (Jerry) Carter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As far as I understand it, Windows 98 doesn't use CIFS.
>
> Support for netbios transport was added in cifs.ko I think around
> 2.6.15
So this would mean that I can access W98 files via CIFS? Felix say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale Schroeder wrote:
> On the other hand, I would love to be able to use cifs exclusively, but
> I have several network drives ( WD and TrendNet ), and neither brand
> will mount via cifs with a credentials file. I have to use smbfs if I
> am to acce
On Mon, 07 May 2007 11:27:44 -0400 Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This isn't directly related, but I think it's indirectly related in a
> major way. W98 is so horribly insecure that developers don't want to
> mess with it, which means testing CIFS with it is a logistical
> problem. The
On the other hand, I would love to be able to use cifs exclusively, but
I have several network drives ( WD and TrendNet ), and neither brand
will mount via cifs with a credentials file. I have to use smbfs if I
am to access them. No amount of googling has provided me with a clue,
and a thread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix,
> On 2007/05/07 13:46 (GMT+0100) John G Walker apparently typed:
>
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 18:24:19 -0400 Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> SUSE wants you to use cifs instead of smbfs,
>
>> So why is SuSE (or Novell) telling me wha
On 2007/05/07 13:46 (GMT+0100) John G Walker apparently typed:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 18:24:19 -0400 Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> SUSE wants you to use cifs instead of smbfs,
> So why is SuSE (or Novell) telling me what I should or shouldn't use?
> In any case, this is a bout the wor
On Mon, 7 May 2007 10:37:37 -0400 Chris Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
> > So why is SuSE (or Novell) telling me what I should or shouldn't
> > use? In any case, this is a bout the world I live in, not about
> > their or my preferences.
>
> They'r
On Monday 07 May 2007, John G Walker wrote:
> So why is SuSE (or Novell) telling me what I should or shouldn't use?
> In any case, this is a bout the world I live in, not about their or my
> preferences.
They're not. Nothing is stopping you from compiling your own kernel and adding
modules, or ev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John G Walker wrote:
> So why is SuSE (or Novell) telling me what I should
> or shouldn't use? In any case, this is a bout the world I live
> in, not about their or my preferences.
smbfs.kio is unmaintained and no one wants to touch it.
It's not jus
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 01:46:33PM +0100, John G Walker wrote:
> As far as I understand it, Windows 98 doesn't use CIFS. Since the
> object of using Samba is partly to access a Windows 98 machine, not
> having SMBFS available sort of defeats the object of using Samba in the
> first place. Maybe the
On Thu, 03 May 2007 18:24:19 -0400 Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007/05/03 17:32 (GMT+0100) John G Walker apparently typed:
>
> > I installed samba on a PC running SuSE 10.2, using the version from
> > the SuSE 10.2 repository (3.0.23). All very nice, except smbmount is
> > missi
On 2007/05/03 17:32 (GMT+0100) John G Walker apparently typed:
> I installed samba on a PC running SuSE 10.2, using the version from the
> SuSE 10.2 repository (3.0.23). All very nice, except smbmount is
> missing.
> As I understand it, this would seem to be because the version offered
> had not
I installed samba on a PC running SuSE 10.2, using the version from the
SuSE 10.2 repository (3.0.23). All very nice, except smbmount is
missing.
As I understand it, this would seem to be because the version offered
had not been compiled with the --with-smbmount option.
Is my interpretation corr
Hi all;
I'm having a problem due locking of files using smbmount (or mount -t smb).
My samba server used with Windows locks allright, overthise, I have a
LTS server that runs a 16-bit system (via DOSEMU) that just don't get
the files locked (just ignore their status).
Does someone know somet
In fact I have fixed the problem now. I have compiled "smbmnt", but I have
not placed the samba files in the "install" directory that specificed at the
compile time, or placed in the "$PATH" (I have placed it in /tmp for
testing...). So the "smbmount" cannot find "smbmnt". It is fixed after I
modi
> execvp of smbmnt failed. Error was No such file or directory.smbmnt
> failed:
> 1
Did you compile and install the helper program 'smbmnt'? On my system
it appears in /usr/bin/smbmnt
Cheers,
Adam.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://list
Hi all,
I am trying to cross compile samba version 2.2.12 to an ARM platform (kernel
2.4.20)
using arm-tools chain 3.4.2.
I get the smbmount compiled, however, when I want to mount a directory that
is located
in a Windows XP PC, I get the following message:
WARNING: The "strip dot"option is d
Hi,
I'm using Ubuntu Dapper Drake 6.06 and Samba 3.0.22 provided by default.
I mounted a samba share:
smbmount //testpc/folder /home/myuser/folder -o username=,passwd=
it mounted successfully.
If I do the 'mount' command, I see the samba mounted folder on my mounts.
I did some ope
Volker Lendecke schrieb:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 07:54:51PM +0800, Latrell wrote:
I encountered a problem with smbmount and win2003 sp1.
It is very likely that smbfs does not do some of the
advanced authentication options that W2k3 SP1 now requires.
Please test the cifs filesystem, smb
Hello,
I am trying to use smbmount to mount a Samba share that is larger than 2
TB. However, the amount of disk space that is displayed from the "df
-k" command for the mounted share is only 2 TB, and when I try to access
the share, my terminal session hangs. Is there a limitation on the siz
Hello,
I am trying to mount a samba partition using a CGI program (C language)
and a get the following error when i do "$ df":
df: `/mnt/b': Input/output error
The samba log bring the following message:
"smbd/service.c:close_cnum(646) srv (192.168.1.2) closed
Hello All,
Is there any information other than uclinux-dev mailing list that
outlines the proper way to use smbmount on uclinux? I have looked
through the mail lists on uclinux-dev and googled everything that I
could think of.
I have tried every form of the smbmount //windowsbox/share /mnt -o
Hi,
During testing I discovered something interesting with different mount
methods. This is the environment:
PDC = RedHat rhel4, 2.6.9-34.0.2ELsmp kernel, samba version 3.0.10-1.4E.6
Client = SuSE sles9, 2.6.5-7244-smp kernel, samba version 3.0.20b-3.4-SUSE
I have a share (shareB) with att
Bob McGowan wrote:
I've spent the last 3 hours (it seems like) going over postings in the
comp.protocols.smb newsgroup trying to find a solution for this problem.
It seems that a lot of folks have had the issue, but none of the posts
I looked at had any useful resolution. Here's the error:
I've spent the last 3 hours (it seems like) going over postings in the
comp.protocols.smb newsgroup trying to find a solution for this problem.
It seems that a lot of folks have had the issue, but none of the posts
I looked at had any useful resolution. Here's the error:
28968: protocol
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:22:20AM -0400, Douglas Corner wrote:
> I am moving FROM:
> RH EL AS 3.0, Kernel is 2.1.21-4, Samba is 3.0.0-14.3E
> (This is what came with the RH distribution)
>
> TO:
> Fedora Core 5 Kernel is 2.6.16-1.2122_FC5 Samba is 3.0.22-1.fc5
>(Both kernel and s
I am moving FROM:
RH EL AS 3.0, Kernel is 2.1.21-4, Samba is 3.0.0-14.3E
(This is what came with the RH distribution)
TO:
Fedora Core 5 Kernel is 2.6.16-1.2122_FC5 Samba is 3.0.22-1.fc5
(Both kernel and samba have been upgraded from the distribution.)
I can't find the smbmount (o
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] smbmount and win2003 sp1
> It is very likely that smbfs does not do some of the
> advanced authentication options that W2k3 SP1 now requires.
> Please test the cifs filesystem, smbfs is unsupported fo
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] smbmount and win2003 sp1
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 07:54:51PM +0800, Latrell wrote:
> I encountered a problem with smbmount and win2003 sp1.
It is very likely that smbfs does not do some of the
advanced authentication options that W2k3 SP1 now requires.
Please test the cifs filesystem, smbfs is unsupported for a
while now.
Hi All:
I encountered a problem with smbmount and win2003 sp1.
Before I upgrade sp1, everything works fine. But after sp1, smbmount can't work.
The command and error message are as follows:
smbmount //localhost/share1 /tmp/mountest -o username=domainu1,password=password
ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess (Acc
Hi All:
I encountered a problem with smbmount and win2003 sp1.
Before I upgrade sp1, everything works fine. But after sp1, smbmount can't work.
The command and error message are as follows:
smbmount //localhost/share1 /tmp/mountest -o username=domainu1,password=password
ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess (Acce
> smbmount //192.168.0.1/backup /mnt/backup rw uid=root gid=root
> credentials=/etc/smbcreds
>
> Can anyone tell me why it isn't reading the password from the
> credentials file
Probably because you forgot the -o flag, and there aren't any commas
between the options :-)
smbmount //192.168.0.1/ba
When I run the following command:
smbmount //192.168.0.1/backup /mnt/backup rw uid=root gid=root
credentials=/etc/smbcreds
I get this:
WARNING: The "printer admin" option is deprecated
Password:
smbcreds contains this:
username=root
password=rootpassword
Can anyone tell me why it isn't reading
Hello,
i have problems with the right's, when i mount my home share.
The Version on the Server is (debian): 3.0.14a-6 0
The Version on the Client is (debian): 3.0.14a-3 0
This is the smb.conf on the Server side:
[global]
unix extensions = no
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
Hello,
i have problems with the right's, when i mount my home share.
The Version on the Server is (debian): 3.0.14a-6 0
The Version on the Client is (debian): 3.0.14a-3 0
This is the smb.conf on the Server side:
[global]
unix extensions = no
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
Stéphane Purnelle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry Alkoff a écrit :
I want to allow two users to mount a share.
Would the syntax be: smbmount //computername/share
/mnt/computername -o username=user1,user2 ??
Larry
No, -o username=xxx it's for specify the usernam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry Alkoff a écrit :
> I want to allow two users to mount a share.
>
> Would the syntax be: smbmount //computername/share
> /mnt/computername -o username=user1,user2 ??
>
> Larry
No, -o username=xxx it's for specify the username which must be used
I want to allow two users to mount a share.
Would the syntax be:
smbmount //computername/share /mnt/computername
-o username=user1,user2 ??
Larry
--
Larry Alkoff N2LA - Austin TX
Using Thunderbird on Slackware Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
in
Hello all.
I just run across the same problem. Did you find the solution?
TIA
Reto
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hey Guys,
I have a strange problem. I have a RHFC3 box connected to a Windows 2003
advanced server share via smbmount. This is what my entry looks like in
/etc/fstab
//datasilo01/tdhcamhsol /mnt/tdhcamhsol smbfs
credentials=/root/.smbpasswd,uid=600,gid=501,ttl=500
We run
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-August/091522.html
Have you resolved this issue?
I am experiencing the same thing.
Thanks,
Chris Ancelin
Product Integration Engineer
Adtec Digital
904.720.2003 x 241 Office #
904.887.6869 Mobile #
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to th
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:32 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 09:16 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:08 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > This will be smbclient correctly finding your 'display
> > charset' (localle) from
Hello Andrew,
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 09:16 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:08 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> This will be smbclient correctly finding your 'display
> charset' (localle) from the environment which the cifsvfs can't tell
> from kernel space. You shoul
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:08:06PM +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 08:34 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > This setup is working pretty well, however on the NT box there are some
> > > files with names containing odd characters like accented charact
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:08 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 08:34 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > This setup is working pretty well, however on the NT box there are some
> > > files with names containing odd characters like accented characters and
Hello Andrew,
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 08:34 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > This setup is working pretty well, however on the NT box there are some
> > files with names containing odd characters like accented characters and
> > ellipsis. I'm a bit at a loss as to the correct settings of the smbmou
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 14:58 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of setting up a backup server for a somewhat
> antiquated NT4 server. Backup server is CentOS-4 (~ RHEL-4),
> kernel-2.6.9-11.EL, samba-client-3.0.10-1.4E, rsync-2.6.3-1,
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8. NT4 shares ar
Hi,
I'm in the process of setting up a backup server for a somewhat
antiquated NT4 server. Backup server is CentOS-4 (~ RHEL-4),
kernel-2.6.9-11.EL, samba-client-3.0.10-1.4E, rsync-2.6.3-1,
LANG=en_US.UTF-8. NT4 shares are mounted on the server and rsynced to
local disk.
This setup is working pre
Hi all,
I have a problem with smbmount. I use smbmount to mount a tree from a
server (either windows xp or linux samba). Then I access the files in it
with the linux smbmount and with windows.
When I open a file (let's say document.doc) in windows with word this
file is sucessfully locked and I
Stupid error.
My options were not comma, but comma and space, separated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hello
I have a problem with smbmount (3.0.14a, Debian Sarge, kernel 2.6.8-2).
I was using the following (on the command line, not /etc/fstab):
smbmount //myserver/myshare /mount/smbmount/ -o
credentials=~/smbcredentials, ro, codepage=cp850, iocharset=iso8859-15
and french caracters (éèà...) were
smbmount v3.0.13
Hi,
I'm trying to set-up my /etc/fstab configuration file to automatically
map to a Samba share at bootup. This is not working I think because the
share that I require has a space within it. This seems to confuse
fstab/smbmount and me. An interactive command such as:
smbmou
hi all..
i'm using samba 3.0.11 and i got a weird problem here..
my domain server have samba 3.0.11 running with ldap support. both my
pc and my server are using slackware 10.1.
i can either joining domain or browsing other network members using
smbclient without
problem. but when i try to mount a
Hello,
When I smbmount a Samba share on a station running Ubuntu 5.04 (Samba
3.0.14a) symbolic links located on the share are not followed (they
appear as symbolic links).
smbmount on Mandrake 7.2 and 9.2 stations work normally.
smbclient works normally, with symbolic links resolution.
The Samba c
Background:
I use rsync to shuffles files around from my production server and
testing server. The testing server's central file share (the one
that the production server pulls from) is a smbmount from an internal
file server (OSX 10.4, but this is irrelevant as you'll see). I had
to swi
Hi:
I have written to this list once before regarding the same problem.
(ref smbmount problem on 03/28/2005)
Paul Gienger sugested asking the "kernel boys" as they maintain smbmount.
Maybe my problem wasn't deserving of a reply from them, maybe I subscribed
to the wrong list. Can someone sugges
I'm trying to copy files from a Windows system to a Linux system using
smbmount. Everything works fine until I hit a text file that is open
read/write on the Windows system, such as an SQL Server database file.
At that point, I get a Text file busy (26) error message, and the
copy process (rsync)
I am using smbfs in /etc/fstab on Debian.
The share mounts with no problem but only root can write to it - not the
user.
The user sharing and the user I want to have access have the same
username but not the same userid
The user can not write.
I am using
uid=
gid=
fmask=777
dmask=777
and most im
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to correctly display
accented from a Win2k served folder mounted on a linux filesystem? I
have exhausted all possibilities I can think of.
First off, ask the kernel boys, they maintain the mount-called
subsystems. Second, perhaps look into CIFS inste
Hello all:
I have an annoying problem with smbmount; My Win2k server has many
folders and files named with accented characters (cp850 and/or cp860 or
European w/0 euro or Portugese).
My mount command is:
mount -t smbfs -o username=leo,codepage=cp850 ///d$ /mnt/pt
to mount my d: drive at /mnt/pt
Hi,
I am also getting the same error. Did you figure out what was the
cause for this error. Could you please let me know.
Thank you,
Ravi
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I wish to mount a Windows network share in Linux (Windows running WinXP)
I can successfully connect to the Windows network share with smbclient:
smbclient //andyson01/clientfiles -U victor%password
But when I try to mount this share with the following:
smbmount //andyson01/clientfiles /home/victor/
Hi,
I'm still having problem with smbmount across two different networks. My
server has a few shares with the guest access enabled, and in the same
network of the server, I can mount those shares in guest mode. Nevertheless,
in another network I cannot mount the share in guest mode (I get a
ERR
help.
François (Belgium)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Skeren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mardi 18 janvier 2005 17:14
To: MATHIEU FRANCOIS-XAVIER
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [Samba] Smbmount and permission denied
MATHIEU FRANCOIS-XAVIER wrote:
>Hello,
>
&g
MATHIEU FRANCOIS-XAVIER wrote:
Hello,
Note that I found many place with similar problem, but I don't understand
any solution. Can you help me ?
I use Samba 3.0.10 on a Suse 8.2.
On SuSE 9.2 I use
mount -t smbfs -U=user //machine_name/share /local/directory. I think
that's the right structure.
Hello,
Note that I found many place with similar problem, but I don't understand
any solution. Can you help me ?
I use Samba 3.0.10 on a Suse 8.2.
My goal is to mount a shared directory from a XP machine to a directory on
my linux.
* I have created a directory in order to mount the XP director
thanks for the suggestions. an interesting update:
the network between the server (a PC in the basement) and the client
(my laptop) uses 802.11b "infrastructure". I found a knob on the linksys
wireless router that could jack up the bandwidth. (why the default wasn't
maxed out is a mystery to me). a
Hello
I have exactly the same problem as you have.
I reported it to Redhat support on 29 November, sent many log files
and tcpdump logs they requested.
They have so far been unable to resolve it.
smbmount (for mounting a volume off a Windows 2003 server onto RHEL 3.0
ES) does not work since sambar
1 - 100 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
