Don't use a smart phone camera for it a decent dedicated digital camera will correct for that optically in the lense, but you are right that is an issue for smart phone cameras due to the physical lense size.
No it would not produce parallax that the is the point of using a photo copy stand. That is how Profesional photographers have been copying photographs without the negatives since the beginning of photography it's a rig designed to prevent exactly that.Now the down side is a good photo copy
On 10/12/2017 04:42 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
Interestingly my father threw me for a loop on this now a days a low
grade digital camera actually has higher resolution than most scanners
so he uses one in a photo copy stand and then just copies the one file
to his computer via a bluetooth
Interestingly my father threw me for a loop on this now a days a low grade digital camera actually has higher resolution than most scanners so he uses one in a photo copy stand and then just copies the one file to his computer via a bluetooth enabled SD card which is faster than any scanner on
I'm currently using an older Epson Perfection with a reasonable degree of
success. HP is probably going to be your best bet for any kind of stable
use and long term support, though. It'll function correctly on about
anything until the unit dies from mechanical failure.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:31:05AM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>Anyone have a favorite flat bed scanner that is SL friendly?
Look at HP All-in-One devices. I've used several models with
"HP OfficeJet Pro" in the model name. I only use the scan function
and it's working fine with Xsane, also
I have an ancient HP SCSI scanner (from 1996 or so). If 300DPI hardware
scan is sufficient, it's excellent. A bit slow, but great scans. The
foam under the lid recently disintegrated; I need to decide whether to
refurb or get something that does 600DPI (which I occasionally need).
Nothing
Dear List,
Anyone have a favorite flat bed scanner that is SL friendly?
Many thanks,
-T
> On 12 Oct 2017, at 14:53, Ken Teh wrote:
>
> On the first update of a newly installed system, there is SL signing keys
> that have to be installed. Yum prompts for confirmation.
>
> Is there a way to install the keys before the first yum update? Are they in
> an rpm somewhere?
On the first update of a newly installed system, there is SL signing keys that
have to be installed. Yum prompts for confirmation.
Is there a way to install the keys before the first yum update? Are they in an
rpm somewhere?
Thanks.
10 matches
Mail list logo