On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:04 AM, zxq9 wrote:
> On Monday 07 April 2014 22:52:57 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> Name 2. Seriously.
>
> Rackspace, Cloudera, IBM, Amazon, Google, RagingWire, RedHat, HP, etc. and
> anyone else on the OpenStack list is deploying it with KVM somewhere that
> makes money
del-Garcia
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 8:22 AM
To: zxq9
Cc: scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: VMs of EL and other environments
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:06 AM, zxq9 wrote:
> On Monday 07 April 2014 22:52:57 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Name 2. Seriously. The KVM management tools a
On 08/04/14 22:24, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>
>> I'm a little biased - but check out: http://xen.crc.id.au/
>
> Heh. I've not had a chance to play with Xen in about 6 years, when
> I published the first (freeware!) RPM's for it. How's it
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> I'm a little biased - but check out: http://xen.crc.id.au/
Heh. I've not had a chance to play with Xen in about 6 years, when
I published the first (freeware!) RPM's for it. How's it been since
Citrix bought it?
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:06 AM, zxq9 wrote:
> On Monday 07 April 2014 22:52:57 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Name 2. Seriously. The KVM management tools are *not* good., at least
>> in Scientific Linux 6 or the upstream vendor's toolkits, because the
>> underlying libvirt toolkit is trying to do to
On 08/04/14 14:06, zxq9 wrote:
> On Monday 07 April 2014 22:52:57 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Name 2. Seriously. The KVM management tools are *not* good., at least
>> in Scientific Linux 6 or the upstream vendor's toolkits, because the
>> underlying libvirt toolkit is trying to do too many things a
On Monday 07 April 2014 22:52:57 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Name 2. Seriously. The KVM management tools are *not* good., at least
> in Scientific Linux 6 or the upstream vendor's toolkits, because the
> underlying libvirt toolkit is trying to do too many things at once and
> therefore getting each
On Monday 07 April 2014 22:52:57 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Name 2. Seriously.
Rackspace, Cloudera, IBM, Amazon, Google, RagingWire, RedHat, HP, etc. and
anyone else on the OpenStack list is deploying it with KVM somewhere that
makes money for them. KVM is by no means the *only* thing they use (
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:23 PM, zxq9 wrote:
> On Monday 07 April 2014 10:41:26 Yasha Karant wrote:
>
>> However, I have not used VirtualBox in a mission-critical server
>> environment. If anyone else has experience with the Oracle pre-packaged
>> VMs under VirtualBox in a distributed server envir
On Monday 07 April 2014 10:41:26 Yasha Karant wrote:
> However, I have not used VirtualBox in a mission-critical server
> environment. If anyone else has experience with the Oracle pre-packaged
> VMs under VirtualBox in a distributed server environment, I would
> appreciate additional observation
been very good about
labeling their modified packages as modified, with an I'm not sure I
want to cooperate with this sort of "we'll make the files available,
but we won't tell you their names" sort of silliness.
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 12:04:22 -0700
From: ykar...@c
with this sort of "we'll make the files available,
but we won't tell you their names" sort of silliness.
>> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 12:04:22 -0700
>> From: ykar...@csusb.edu
>> To: scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov
>> Subject: VMs of EL and other environments
>
e VMs that Oracle offers or about Virtual
Box itself?
Thanks,--- A
> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 12:04:22 -0700
> From: ykar...@csusb.edu
> To: scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov
> Subject: VMs of EL and other environments
>
> I realize that VirtualBox is separate from SL. However, Oracl
I realize that VirtualBox is separate from SL. However, Oracle has a
distro based upon the same TUV that SL uses and provides a set of
pre-built VMs for
specific purposes - title and URL appear below. Has anyone on this list
used any of these, and if so, any comments on the efficacy of such us
14 matches
Mail list logo
