On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Yasha Karant wrote:
...
Is it safe to do the merry chase down the dependency trail to port a later
parted to SL 6 or will some of these cause SL 6 to fail/become unstable?
Does anyone have a SL 6 port of either parted or gparted that is more recent
than the stock SL 6
On 07/27/2011 11:23 PM, Steven J. Yellin wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Yasha Karant wrote:
...
Is it safe to do the merry chase down the dependency trail to port a
later parted to SL 6 or will some of these cause SL 6 to fail/become
unstable? Does anyone have a SL 6 port of either parted or
On 07/28/2011 12:48 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 07/27/2011 11:23 PM, Steven J. Yellin wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Yasha Karant wrote:
...
Is it safe to do the merry chase down the dependency trail to port a
later parted to SL 6 or will some of these cause SL 6 to fail/become
unstable? Does
My experience with SL6 at the moment is very good.
Now I'm looking to install Wine, but can not find it.
I need to manage some RouterOS with WinBox
I've been searching but only find by Centos and Fedora.
I tried applying it to SL6, but I have not worked.
Any ideas?
Thkns !
--
On 07/28/2011 03:26 PM, Pere Casas Puig wrote:
My experience with SL6 at the moment is very good.
Now I'm looking to install Wine, but can not find it.
I need to manage some RouterOS with WinBox
I've been searching but only find by Centos and Fedora.
I tried applying it to SL6, but I have
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 14:26 +0200, Pere Casas Puig wrote:
My experience with SL6 at the moment is very good.
Now I'm looking to install Wine, but can not find it.
I need to manage some RouterOS with WinBox
I've been searching but only find by Centos and Fedora.
I tried applying it to SL6,
On 07/27/2011 05:23 PM, Rich wrote:
Hi all,
I've got questions about two different failure modes I experienced
while trying to kickstart SL6.1 on some hardware to play with.
First, when I kickstarted it on this hardware, it immediately
hardlocked (display black, keyboard unresponsive with no
One point of clarification. CUPS was NOT developed by Apple, they bought
it. I used to talk to the guy who actually created it many YEARS ago as free
software. He then commercialized it some, then eventually sold it off. I
guess Apple owns the rights to it now.
On 07/28/2011 01:38 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
You state:
Although the formatting was not done on SL6, SL6 did
install on the existing partitions and seems to be working fine.
On what system using what utilities did you format the WD drives?
For the SL6 system the partitioning was either done
On 07/28/2011 06:32 AM, Brent L. Bates wrote:
One point of clarification. CUPS was NOT developed by Apple, they bought
it. I used to talk to the guy who actually created it many YEARS ago as free
software. He then commercialized it some, then eventually sold it off. I
guess Apple owns
I forget to mention the fc-list command displays all the fonts.
jonathan
Hi, I am very confused about the fontpath in SL6. in the xorg.log i have
FontPath set to:
catalogue:/etc/X11/fontpath.d,
built-ins
if I
Hi, I am very confused about the fontpath in SL6. in the xorg.log i have
FontPath set to:
catalogue:/etc/X11/fontpath.d,
built-ins
if I run the chkfontpath --list command i have
Current directories in font path:
1: catalogue:/etc/X11/fontpath.d
2: /usr/share/fonts/msttcorefonts
Hi SL maintainers:
It appears that I can not find any of these RPMs in the latest security
update,
kernel-module-openafs-2.6.18-238.19.1.el5xen-1.4.12-79.sl5.x86_64.rpm
kernel-module-openafs-2.6.18-238.19.1.el5xen-1.4.14-80.sl5.x8686_64.rpm
I could not find any i686 RPMs as well. Is there an
July 28, 2011
Scientific Linux 6.1 is now officially released and available.
We want to thank everyone who has contributed, tested, and given us
feedback. We feel that this is one of our best releases yet, and we
couldn't have done it without the entire SL community.
Scientific Linux 6.1 has
On 07/28/2011 11:04 AM, Zhi-Wei Lu wrote:
Hi SL maintainers:
It appears that I can not find any of these RPMs in the latest security
update,
kernel-module-openafs-2.6.18-238.19.1.el5xen-1.4.12-79.sl5.x86_64.rpm
kernel-module-openafs-2.6.18-238.19.1.el5xen-1.4.14-80.sl5.x8686_64.rpm
I could
Hi,
Scientific Linux 6.1 LiveCD, LiveMiniCD and LiveDVD are also officially
released.
They are available for 32-bit and 64-bit and come with following window manager
LiveMiniCD icewm
LiveCD gnome
LiveDVDgnome, kde, icewm
Software was added from rpmforge, epel and elrepo
OK, now I have only two new questions:)
1. When trying to install wine, I have a dependency problem.
package tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-57.el6.rfx.x86_64 (Which is newer Than
tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-56.3.el6.i686) is already installed
What I have to use tool to solve this problem?
or I have to delete
Hi,
Here's a list of upgrade options from SL 6.0 to SL 6.1.
Option 1: similar to RHEL / CentOS for i386 and x86_64:
yum install yum-conf-sl6x
yum clean all
yum update
Option 2: Scientific Linux way
i386:
rpm -Uvh
On 07/28/2011 04:29 PM, Alexander Hunt wrote:
On 07/28/2011 08:09 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 07/28/2011 02:21 AM, Alexander Hunt wrote:
On 07/28/2011 12:48 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 07/27/2011 11:23 PM, Steven J. Yellin wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Yasha Karant wrote:
...
Is it safe to do
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Yasha Karant wrote:
...
Also, I have built parted 3.0 on SL 6.1 (I have upgraded my workstation to
6.1 now that it has gone to production status). Does anyone have a current
gparted or other GUI based partitioning utility that supports the features of
parted 3 on SL
(Hopefully, this is a new thread, not a hijacked one.)
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Yasha Karant wrote:
...
Also, I have built parted 3.0 on SL 6.1 (I have upgraded my
workstation to 6.1 now that it has gone to production status). Does
anyone have a current gparted or other GUI based partitioning
21 matches
Mail list logo
