On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I write backports for EPEL and Repoforge from Fedora, and use a Fedora test
environment to make sure my older packages will be forward compatible. The
shift in init script management is going to be *fun*.
Most of my linux users use Ubuntu rather tha
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:39:45AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Konstantin Olchanski
> wrote:
> >
> > Another boring shuffle, yawn. ...
>
> It's not a boring shuffle. The systemd change will be a major one.
>
RT11->BBC basic->MSDOS->VMS->IRIX->Linux->WinNT->SunOS->Linux
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Elijah Buck wrote:
Hello,
I have an NFSv3 server that allows mounts from unprivileged ports, and a
SL6 NFS client with untrusted users (but root is trusted). I want to
prevent users from mounting the NFS share from an unprivileged port.
My hope was that I could put iptable
On 04/10/2012 02:22 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Bring popcorn. Fedora 17 is getting rid of /bin and /sbin, replacing the
directories with symlinks to /usr/bin and /usr/sbin.
And don't be surprised if F18 merges "/usr/bin" and "/usr/sbin".
This i
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Bluejay Adametz wrote:
>>
>> Well, within limits. Otherwise you have user rebelions, etc. I guess they
>> use Fedora as a thermometer.
>
> I wonder just how much the user base overlaps between Fedora and RHEL.
>
> Around my little part of the world, the overlap is z
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Adrian Sevcenco
> wrote:
>> On 04/09/12 23:10, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:44:31PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It's RH's right as a distribution to decide to make us choo
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> The NetworkManager bug report for bridging is:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546197
>
> and for bonding is:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540995
Thanks but this isn't bonding as is understood in creating NIC
redun
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> On 04/09/12 22:36, Tom H wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Konstantin Olchanski
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:03:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
On 04/09/2012 12:02 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>
> That's
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:44:31PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> It's RH's right as a distribution to decide to make us choose between
>> vi and nm-connection-editor
>
> Well, within limits. Otherwise you have user rebelions, etc. I guess th
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Bluejay Adametz wrote:
> > Well, within limits. Otherwise you have user rebelions, etc. I guess
> they use Fedora as a thermometer.
>
> I wonder just how much the user base overlaps between Fedora and RHEL.
>
> Around my little part of the world, the overlap is zero
On 04/10/2012 10:22 AM, Bluejay Adametz wrote:
Well, within limits. Otherwise you have user rebelions, etc. I guess they use
Fedora as a thermometer.
I wonder just how much the user base overlaps between Fedora and RHEL.
Around my little part of the world, the overlap is zero. The
operations
> Well, within limits. Otherwise you have user rebelions, etc. I guess they use
> Fedora as a thermometer.
I wonder just how much the user base overlaps between Fedora and RHEL.
Around my little part of the world, the overlap is zero. The
operations I support would never be candidates for a shor
On 04/09/2012 04:55 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Given that rc.local does NOT work in F16 [snip]
Umm, Adrian - are sure about that?
Note /etc/rc.d/rc.local (not /etc/rc.local).
$ systemctl -a | grep rc.local
rc-local.service loaded active exited/etc/rc.d/rc.local
Compatibili
Hi again,
on Apache server, how do I allow users to access files in their home
folders?
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> On 04/09/12 23:10, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:44:31PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> >>
> >> It's RH's right as a distribution to decide to make us choose between
> >> vi and nm-connection-editor
> >
> > Well, within l
On Monday, April 09, 2012 05:57:29 PM Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, April 09, 2012 03:24:33 PM you wrote:
> > Sadly, last time I saw every guide on how to setup virtual machines
> > (KVM) in bridge configuration started with "turn off network manager"..
>
> Sadly, this is true even of the officia
On Monday, April 09, 2012 03:24:33 PM you wrote:
> Sadly, last time I saw every guide on how to setup virtual machines
> (KVM) in bridge configuration started with "turn off network manager"..
Sadly, this is true even of the official upstream documentation.
The NetworkManager bug report for bridg
Hey Tam,
great help! I followed your suggestion and finally got my vhost
authentication setting worked. Sorry about the confusion.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Tam Nguyen wrote:
> Your question is not really clear me so I am interpreting it as 2
> different questions. First, your iptabl
On 04/09/12 23:10, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:44:31PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> It's RH's right as a distribution to decide to make us choose between
>> vi and nm-connection-editor
>
> Well, within limits. Otherwise you have user rebelions, etc. I guess they use
> Fe
On 04/09/12 22:36, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Konstantin Olchanski
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:03:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>>> On 04/09/2012 12:02 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
That's right. Nm manager gui or vi. Our way or the highway. So you arr
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:44:31PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>
> It's RH's right as a distribution to decide to make us choose between
> vi and nm-connection-editor
Well, within limits. Otherwise you have user rebelions, etc. I guess they use
Fedora as a thermometer.
> in the same way that it decided
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:44:42PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On Monday, April 09, 2012 12:31:39 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:40:02AM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
... and the current NetworkManage
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:03:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>> On 04/09/2012 12:02 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>>>
>>> That's right. Nm manager gui or vi. Our way or the highway. So you arrive
>>> to a remote location
>>> to fix
Hi Lamar Owen!
On 2012.04.09 at 13:35:36 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote next:
> In 2004, when NetworkManager first came on the scene, the opposite was true,
> where any network connectivity required either distribution-specific tools or
> text editing of config files, regardless of network technology
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Ken Teh wrote:
>>> TUV needs an option in kickstart to turn off NM for designated cards.
>>> Btw,
>>> NM_CONTROLLED="no" in ifcfg-eth0 is not sufficient.
Your question is not really clear me so I am interpreting it as 2 different
questions. First, your iptables' syntax looks fine to me. Maybe someone
in the forum will see something I may have missed.
As for your HTTP configuration, the order is mismatch.
Because you have:
Order allow,deny
>
All
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 10:39:49 -0700
Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 07:15:54PM +0200, ... wrote:
> >
> > livecd-iso-to-disk --format
> > --reset-mbr /path-to-iso/SL-62-x86_64-2012-02-06-Install-DVD.iso /dev/sdc
> >
>
>
> This ought to be
> "dd /path-to-iso/SL-62-x86_64-201
On Monday, April 09, 2012 01:39:49 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> This ought to be "dd /path-to-iso/SL-62-x86_64-2012-02-06-Install-DVD.iso
> /dev/sdc".
If would be pretty nice if dd if=install.iso of=/dev/usb-stick worked indeed,
but that's not quite there yet.
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 07:15:54PM +0200, ... wrote:
>
> livecd-iso-to-disk --format
> --reset-mbr /path-to-iso/SL-62-x86_64-2012-02-06-Install-DVD.iso /dev/sdc
>
This ought to be "dd /path-to-iso/SL-62-x86_64-2012-02-06-Install-DVD.iso
/dev/sdc".
As I understand, Linux Mint ISO images alread
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 01:18:37PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, April 09, 2012 12:48:44 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> > (I hope some day the SL installer will learn how to install RPMs from a
> > directory
> > instead of from an ISO image. On this happy day we will gain the ability to
On Monday, April 09, 2012 01:02:00 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> As I say,
> people who come up with this stuff do not think beyound "it works on my
> laptop".
In 2004, when NetworkManager first came on the scene, the opposite was true,
where any network connectivity required either distribut
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:03:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 12:02 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> >That's right. Nm manager gui or vi. Our way or the highway. So you arrive to
> >a remote location
> >to fix broken network config and find that the mouse walked away, too,
> >wel
On Monday, April 09, 2012 12:48:44 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> (I hope some day the SL installer will learn how to install RPMs from a
> directory
> instead of from an ISO image. On this happy day we will gain the ability to
> customise the installer by adding and removing packages as we wish
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 10:09:25 -0700
Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 06:55:18PM +0200, Andras Horvath wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 09:48:44 -0700
> > Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> > > Since all the wiki pages about installing live usb creators, etc
> > > bore me ...
> >
> >
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 06:55:18PM +0200, Andras Horvath wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 09:48:44 -0700
> Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> > Since all the wiki pages about installing live usb creators, etc bore me ...
>
> I suggest you to take a look at this thread in SL forum:
> http://scientificlinuxf
On 04/09/2012 12:02 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
That's right. Nm manager gui or vi. Our way or the highway. So you arrive to a
remote location
to fix broken network config and find that the mouse walked away, too, welcome
to vi.
or nmcli
Pat
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:44:42PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, April 09, 2012 12:31:39 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:40:02AM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > >
> > > ... and the current NetworkManager doesn't handle many production server
> > > networking task
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 09:48:44 -0700
Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:52:00AM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > On Friday, April 06, 2012 10:16:45 AM you wrote:
> > > Can someone explain what the problem is here? I really
> > > don't care about creating a live Linux on a f
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:52:00AM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, April 06, 2012 10:16:45 AM you wrote:
> > Can someone explain what the problem is here? I really don't
> > care about creating a live Linux on a flash drive, just want to
> > install without burning a D
On Monday, April 09, 2012 12:31:39 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:40:02AM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >
> > ... and the current NetworkManager doesn't handle many production server
> > networking tasks,
> > so upstream left the existing mechanism in place so choice is a
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:40:02AM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> ... and the current NetworkManager doesn't handle many production server
> networking tasks,
> so upstream left the existing mechanism in place so choice is available.
>
No, they have not. In SL6, they have removed the old graphical
On Friday, April 06, 2012 10:16:45 AM you wrote:
> Can someone explain what the problem is here? I really don't
> care about creating a live Linux on a flash drive, just want to
> install without burning a DVD but nothing I have tried so far
> has met with success. I
Hi,
after so many attempts of unsuccessfully restricted and allowed specified
domain from accessing my vhost, I tried the firewall. Firewall did not
work. Not sure where I messed it up. See below, port 80, REJECT ip_address
wasn't working. That IP address was my laptop:
HTTP:
DirectoryRoot
On Thursday, April 05, 2012 08:56:20 PM you wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Ken Teh wrote:
>
> > Is it true that the network manager service turns off the network when
> > there is no activity?
No. Only if not configured to be active for all users will it not come up on
boot. There m
44 matches
Mail list logo
