i feel that for Lost I lost interest and quite watching last year because I
couldn't take it when they said the slowly-unfolding-mystery would go until
2010! That's just stretching out a myster that frankly should have been told in
three years. But I don't see that with Heroes, it was pretty
Eactly! What made Babylon 5 so great, was its tight story arc created
and implemented within 5 years by JMS. I get the feeling that both
Lost and Heroes are going on... and on... and on... and on... To me,
that does not feel like sincere storytelling.
George
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com,
why do you say B5 hasn't aged well?
-- Original message --
From: Justin Mohareb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lost has really picked up the pace in this season and last. Heroes
made a huge mistake in season 2, because they went right back and were
way too similar to season 1.
B5...
Why do I like New Amsterdam better than both Lost and Heroes?
Frankly, both Lost and Heroes remind me of the daily soaps: General
Hospital, As The World Turns, etc. Nothing ever really gets resolved.
It's like one long fake-out to me. And to keep viewers interested,
the plots get ever more
Wow, while I've lost interest in Lost (can't put more time into this mystery
show that has frequent repeats, half-seasons, and dragging waaay too many
seasons), I like Heroes a great deal. I haven't seen anything in New
Amsterdam to make it better than Heroes when the latter's at its best.
I like the series a lot. My wife and I watch it regularly on TV, not
via the web. New Amsterdam is far more interesting than both Lost and
Heroes.
George
http://ivebeenmugged.typepad.com
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone catch the series premiere tonight? I
