On 12.12.2014 19:32, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de
mailto:tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 12.12.2014 18:43, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
[...]
It would be a little odd to have our code at bitbucket and our
wiki at
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.com wrote:
(Dirk, I think that would also help the occasional contributor overhead
you're concerned about.)
I support Dirk, but in my opinion it is not overhead, but a showstopper. =)
--
anatoly t.
Gary,
On 13.12.2014 15:06, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
Here's a wiki progress report.
* I've re-enabled the regular wiki, in read-only mode. That way at
least people can see it. Pair may take it down again but it's better
than nothing.
* I put up test versions of the wiki, converted to
Hi,
Just a side remark, as a former user of that wiki:
The issue is that most of it is outdated: refers to obsolete methods, uses
Python methods whereas there is now a SCons method, etc...
And even when it's not, readers don't trust fully what they see, because, well,
how can they know if this
On 13.12.2014 18:00, alexandre.feb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just a side remark, as a former user of that wiki:
The issue is that most of it is outdated: refers to obsolete methods, uses
Python methods whereas there is now a SCons method, etc...
And even when it's not, readers don't trust fully
On 13.12.2014 17:53, Bill Deegan wrote:
Can find search on bitbucket version, but it's there on github.
Good point, that would speak for github then..since bitbucket isn't too
interested in searching and hierarchies:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bitbucket-users/R0ZJrWhhMTo
I knew this was coming while writing it :-)
But no, I must confess I'm not able to spend the time it deserves on this.
Le 13 déc. 2014 à 18:21, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de a écrit :
On 13.12.2014 18:00, alexandre.feb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just a side remark, as a former user of that wiki:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 13.12.2014 17:53, Bill Deegan wrote:
Can find search on bitbucket version, but it's there on github.
Good point, that would speak for github then..since bitbucket isn't too
interested in searching and hierarchies:
All,
I think two items for wiki are must have:
1) full text searchable from the wiki
2) index able by google and others.
I'm pretty sure neither bitbucket nor github has both. (Though I suppose 1
would come with 2)
As for giving specific contributors unfettered write access. I think we
could
On 13.12.2014 21:54, Bill Deegan wrote:
All,
I think two items for wiki are must have:
1) full text searchable from the wiki
2) index able by google and others.
I'm pretty sure neither bitbucket nor github has both. (Though I suppose 1
would come with 2)
As for giving specific contributors
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Bill Deegan b...@baddogconsulting.com
wrote:
All,
I think two items for wiki are must have:
1) full text searchable from the wiki
2) index able by google and others.
I'm pretty sure neither bitbucket nor github has both. (Though I suppose 1
would come with
11 matches
Mail list logo
