PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:07 PM
To: 'Brad Arlt'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Questions about 192.168
Brad wrote:
192.168.1.255 are both ping-able). When doing nmap, it shows
192.168.1.255 as remote, the others as local. However, when I do a
traceroute on these supposedly
-Original Message-
From: David Gillett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Questions about 192.168
Since 192.168 is a non-routeable IP (ie: wont reach the
Internet), it's
no real surprise that nothing answered you from
Brad wrote:
192.168.1.255 are both ping-able). When doing nmap, it shows
192.168.1.255 as remote, the others as local. However, when I do a
traceroute on these supposedly local ones, it shows a number of hops
out
over the Internet, implying that they are not connected locally. Does
this
Hi,
I've been following some of the conversations about 192.168 networks,
and tried some experimentation, and came up with a few questions:
1. I've tried the technique mentioned to ping the broadcast address,
and then check arp -a (on Windows 2000 machines). This didn't seem to
work. For
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 08:27:17PM -0400, Jim wrote:
I've been following some of the conversations about 192.168 networks,
and tried some experimentation, and came up with a few questions:
1. I've tried the technique mentioned to ping the broadcast address,
and then check arp -a (on Windows
-Original Message-
From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 7, 2003 17:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Questions about 192.168
Hi,
I've been following some of the conversations about 192.168 networks,
and tried some experimentation, and came up with a few questions
jim: Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:27:17 -0400
jim: From: Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jim: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jim: Subject: Questions about 192.168
jim:
jim: Hi,
jim:
jim: I've been following some of the conversations about 192.168 networks,
jim: and tried some experimentation, and came up
boxes and killing a case of beer
while enumerating my mom's PC 6000 miles away (Only as practical examples
mom, never in malice)
D. Weiss
CCNA/MCSE
Original Message-
From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Questions about 192.168
As mentioned above, the class B 192.168.xxx.yyy IPs and class A
10.xxx.yyy.zzz IPs (as well as a class C set of IP addresses) are not
routeable.
Just to clarify, 192.168 is the private class C address space. The
class B address space is actually 172.16. From RFC1918:
The Internet Assigned
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 19:20, Birl wrote:
jim: Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:27:17 -0400
jim: From: Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jim: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jim: Subject: Questions about 192.168
jim:
jim: Hi,
jim:
jim: I've been following some of the conversations about 192.168 networks,
jim
10 matches
Mail list logo
