PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:07 PM
To: 'Brad Arlt'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Questions about 192.168
Brad wrote:
192.168.1.255 are both ping-able). When doing nmap, it shows
192.168.1.255 as remote, the others as local. However, when I do a
traceroute on these supposedly
Brad wrote:
192.168.1.255 are both ping-able). When doing nmap, it shows
192.168.1.255 as remote, the others as local. However, when I do a
traceroute on these supposedly local ones, it shows a number of hops
out
over the Internet, implying that they are not connected locally. Does
this
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 08:27:17PM -0400, Jim wrote:
I've been following some of the conversations about 192.168 networks,
and tried some experimentation, and came up with a few questions:
1. I've tried the technique mentioned to ping the broadcast address,
and then check arp -a (on Windows
-Original Message-
From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 7, 2003 17:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Questions about 192.168
Hi,
I've been following some of the conversations about 192.168 networks,
and tried some experimentation, and came up with a few questions:
jim: Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:27:17 -0400
jim: From: Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jim: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jim: Subject: Questions about 192.168
jim:
jim: Hi,
jim:
jim: I've been following some of the conversations about 192.168 networks,
jim: and tried some experimentation, and came up with a
X.X.X.255 is a broadcast address normally. Ignore super netting, etc. Just
think class C IPs for the moment, like your modem. Your cable modem is, for
all intents and purposes, a router, whether or not you have it set as some
can, to Gateway. If yours is old, it may not be a router, but lets keep
As mentioned above, the class B 192.168.xxx.yyy IPs and class A
10.xxx.yyy.zzz IPs (as well as a class C set of IP addresses) are not
routeable.
Just to clarify, 192.168 is the private class C address space. The
class B address space is actually 172.16. From RFC1918:
The Internet Assigned
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 19:20, Birl wrote:
jim: Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:27:17 -0400
jim: From: Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jim: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jim: Subject: Questions about 192.168
jim:
jim: Hi,
jim:
jim: I've been following some of the conversations about 192.168 networks,
jim:
