+1
Will help when i can, but dont have much time at the moment.
Daniel.
-Original Message-
From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 April 2005 09:58
To: server-dev@james.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] POJO pattern
I propose that work commence to extract James's value add
+1
Danny Angus wrote:
I propose that work commence to extract James's value add IP from classes
supporting Avalon specific lifecycle attributes, and Avalon component
dependance, to POJO classes.
I further propose that these POJO's are designed to support IoC but are
agnostic in their choice of
For example:
SMTPHandler - CDISMTPHandler
- SpringSMTPHandler
- JCASMTPHandler
- AvalonSMTPHandler
Please indicate your prefrence:
[ ] +1 I agree that Agnostic SDI style POJO's are an
effective
the merging process, which took almost 2 years (until now) will kill James,
if it hasn't killed it already. Nobody knows which is the real head branch,
etc.
It would be better if you rename 2.1(?), which is the production version
(almost), and officially abandon the current head. If somebody
the merging process, which took almost 2 years (until now)
Actually, not even one. And that only because I got *really* busy, and was
told that I should commit it finished rather than as a work-in-progress,
which meant that no one else was contributing to it.
Nobody knows which is the real
-Original Message-
From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 April 2005 17:23
To: James Developers List
Subject: Re: Merging (was [VOTE] POJO pattern)
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
the merging process, which took almost 2 years (until now)
Actually, not even one.
I can't seem to build proposal imap2.
Keeps saying that:
org.bouncycastle.mail.smime.*;
and:
import org.bouncycastle.jce.*;
don't exist.
I already tried copying the relevant jars to tools/lib.
Even tried adding entries to include.properties.
Somebody must know!
Thanks.
