[jira] Commented: (JAMES-295) Missing sqlDefs wont be detected

2005-08-08 Thread Mark Daring (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-295?page=comments#action_12317942 ] Mark Daring commented on JAMES-295: --- This logic doesnt detect missing sqldef, it only throws an exception if theres no sqldef at all. This will fix it: Element

[jira] Resolved: (JAMES-324) pop3 server hanging upon ssl connections

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-324?page=all ] Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-324: --- Resolution: Invalid It was a bug in Redhat9 thread management. pop3 server hanging upon ssl connections

[jira] Assigned: (JAMES-295) Missing sqlDefs wont be detected

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-295?page=all ] Stefano Bagnara reassigned JAMES-295: - Assign To: Stefano Bagnara Missing sqlDefs wont be detected Key: JAMES-295 URL:

[jira] Updated: (JAMES-190) Apache license 2.0

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-190?page=all ] Stefano Bagnara updated JAMES-190: -- Fix Version: 2.2.1 (was: 3.0) Description: Apply new apache software license to project. Required to make releases after March

[jira] Closed: (JAMES-190) Apache license 2.0

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-190?page=all ] Stefano Bagnara closed JAMES-190: - Resolution: Fixed (edit test) Apache license 2.0 -- Key: JAMES-190 URL:

[jira] Resolved: (JAMES-359) remote address from Received header is not handled

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-359?page=all ] Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-359: --- Fix Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: Fixed Was already fixed in svn when reported. remote address from Received header is not handled

[jira] Reopened: (JAMES-190) Apache license 2.0

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-190?page=all ] Stefano Bagnara reopened JAMES-190: --- (edit test) Apache license 2.0 -- Key: JAMES-190 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-190

svn commit: r230775 - /james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/core/MimeMessageWrapper.java

2005-08-08 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 8 02:00:43 2005 New Revision: 230775 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=230775view=rev Log: MimeMessageWrapper: fix for long subjects (JAMES-356) Modified: james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/core/MimeMessageWrapper.java Modified:

[jira] Resolved: (JAMES-356) MimeMessageWrapper does not handle multiline headers

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-356?page=all ] Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-356: --- Fix Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: Fixed Created an unfold method (not so optimized) and added it to the subject handling routine

[jira] Created: (JAMES-391) Move candidates libraries to the official lib / remove unused libraries

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
Move candidates libraries to the official lib / remove unused libraries - Key: JAMES-391 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-391 Project: James Type: Task Versions: 2.2.1

[jira] Resolved: (JAMES-323) using toUppercase, toLowerCase, equalsIgnoreCase without specifying the locale is a bug

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-323?page=all ] Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-323: --- Fix Version: 2.2.1 Resolution: Fixed Used Locale.US (as it was already used instead of Locale.ENGLISH). using toUppercase, toLowerCase,

[jira] Created: (JAMES-392) Resolve deprecation use from MailetAPI for the next release

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
Resolve deprecation use from MailetAPI for the next release --- Key: JAMES-392 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-392 Project: James Type: Task Versions: 2.2.1 Reporter: Stefano Bagnara

Re: Next release (Was: Merging version 2.2.1 to 3.0 and 3.0 roadmap)

2005-08-08 Thread Soren Hilmer
On Sunday 07 August 2005 19:32, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Stefano Bagnara wrote: BXA issues? Are they specific to James or a new issue regarding all ASF projects? General to all code developed and/or exported from the USA that contains any crypto code. Adding S/MIME support to JAMES created

Re: Next release (Was: Merging version 2.2.1 to 3.0 and 3.0 roadmap)

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara
General to all code developed and/or exported from the USA that contains any crypto code. Adding S/MIME support to JAMES created the problem. Well the problem is not the S/MIME code itself, as it merely leverages on the BouncyCastle api for the crypto-routines. The fact that we

[jira] Assigned: (JAMES-390) Add derby support

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-390?page=all ] Stefano Bagnara reassigned JAMES-390: - Assign To: Stefano Bagnara Add derby support - Key: JAMES-390 URL:

[jira] Assigned: (JAMES-52) 8bitmime capabilities missing

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-52?page=all ] Stefano Bagnara reassigned JAMES-52: Assign To: Stefano Bagnara 8bitmime capabilities missing - Key: JAMES-52 URL:

RE: svn commit: r230781 - in /james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james: mailrepository/MBoxMailRepository.java transport/mailets/CommandListservManager.java transport/mailets/RemoteDelivery.java t

2005-08-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stefano, Please be more careful with commits or at least your commit messages. These commits: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/mailrepository/MBoxMailRepository.java?rev=230781r1=230780r2=230781view=diff

RTC vs CTR (Was: svn commit: r230781)

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Sure, I will add better comments! I haven't asked wether James use a RTC (review-then-commit) or a CTR (commit-then-review) approach. I'm ready to apply a cumulative patch to: DSNBounce should be configured by default http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-357 Upgrade to dnsjava 2.0.0

RE: RTC vs CTR (Was: svn commit: r230781)

2005-08-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
I haven't asked wether James use a RTC (review-then-commit) or a CTR (commit-then-review) approach. That depends. :-) Are we about to do a release? How risky is the patch? Should we create a branch first, apply the patches, review/test and then merge back to trunk? Those are the sorts of

Re: RTC vs CTR (Was: svn commit: r230781)

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara
I haven't asked wether James use a RTC (review-then-commit) or a CTR (commit-then-review) approach. That depends. :-) Are we about to do a release? How risky is the patch? Should we create a branch first, apply the patches, review/test and then merge back to trunk? Those are

Cornerstone/avalon upgrades (loom?)

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara
I plan to investigate about deploying james-svn on loom. Is there any interest in upgrading to a newer avalon container (and cornerstone libraries)? I've seen many newer cornerstone jars on the excalibur site. I've also seen an avalon-framework-4.1.5 in the loom distribution and

RE: Cornerstone/avalon upgrades (loom?)

2005-08-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Talking with Peter Royal at ApacheCon, Peter didn't think that there was really any reason for us to migrate to Loom. It didn't change much from Phoenix, and has pretty much frozen. Unless we have a real reason, I think that we would be best off staying where we are (update the Avalon pieces

Spooler change

2005-08-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
One more change ... and one I haven't had time to make. I would like to see the spooler change to have a single thread reading from the spool, and use worker threads to run the processors. That should simplify, if not eliminate, a lot of the synchronization/locking issues. --- Noel

Re: Cornerstone/avalon upgrades (loom?)

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Talking with Peter Royal at ApacheCon, Peter didn't think that there was really any reason for us to migrate to Loom. It didn't change much from Phoenix, and has pretty much frozen. Ok, very useful info! I will avoid to loose time around :-) Unless we have a real reason, I think that we

Re: Spooler change

2005-08-08 Thread Ahmed Mohombe
I would like to see the spooler change to have a single thread reading from the spool, and use worker threads to run the processors. That should simplify, if not eliminate, a lot of the synchronization/locking issues. One of my notes points to a JMS (ActiveMQ) based spoolmanager. Now that

Re: Spooler change

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara
One of my notes points to a JMS (ActiveMQ) based spoolmanager. Now that we added derby it would be also easier (ActiveMQ default db is Derby, too). I'm not sure how much work is needed for JMS compared to the patch to make the current spoolmanager single threaded. If

Re: Spooler change

2005-08-08 Thread Ahmed Mohombe
Hi, One of my notes points to a JMS (ActiveMQ) based spoolmanager. Now that we added derby it would be also easier (ActiveMQ default db is Derby, too). I'm not sure how much work is needed for JMS compared to the patch to make the current spoolmanager single threaded. If

svn commit: r230819 - /james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/SMTPHandler.java

2005-08-08 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 8 10:30:41 2005 New Revision: 230819 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=230819view=rev Log: 8BITMIME announce support (see also JAMES-52). SMTPHandler cleaning: unused variable removed. Modified:

svn commit: r230821 - in /james/server/trunk: ./ lib/ src/conf/ src/java/org/apache/james/util/mordred/

2005-08-08 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 8 10:43:28 2005 New Revision: 230821 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=230821view=rev Log: Upgrade to dnsjava 2.0.0 (JAMES-388) Add derby support (JAMES-390) Invert precompilation logic for jdbc3 (JAMES-389) Move candidates libraries to the official lib / remove

svn commit: r230829 - /james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/dnsserver/DNSServer.java

2005-08-08 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 8 11:02:04 2005 New Revision: 230829 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=230829view=rev Log: Forgot to commit this files for the previous upgrade to dnsjava 2.0.0 (JAMES-388). Also cleaned old comments (they are persistent in svn). Modified:

svn commit: r230830 - /james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/pop3server/POP3Handler.java

2005-08-08 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 8 11:03:40 2005 New Revision: 230830 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=230830view=rev Log: Import cleaning and changes to remove excalibur-collections to POP3Handler. Move candidates libraries to the official lib / remove unused libraries (JAMES-391) Modified:

Re: svn commit: r230829 - /james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/dnsserver/DNSServer.java

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara
I commited by mistake the single IP per MX patch: now I revert the change. (I've got too much changes in my local james.. Hope to be aligned soon) /** + * If true than the DNS server will return only a single IP per each MX record + * when looking up SMTPServers + */ +

svn commit: r230835 - /james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/dnsserver/DNSServer.java

2005-08-08 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 8 11:16:20 2005 New Revision: 230835 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=230835view=rev Log: Reverted a small code patch about single ip per mx committed by mistake (it was from another issue) Modified:

svn commit: r230849 - /james/server/trunk/src/conf/james-config.xml

2005-08-08 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Mon Aug 8 11:32:18 2005 New Revision: 230849 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=230849view=rev Log: Added commented configurations to support derby (JAMES-390) Modified: james/server/trunk/src/conf/james-config.xml Modified:

Re: Spooler change

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara
One of my notes points to a JMS (ActiveMQ) based spoolmanager. Yes, I've looked at ActiveMQ, ActiveCluster and ActiveSpaces. But I don't think that this change is a simple drop-in, and I would be concerned about performance and reliability. Not that the code is bad, but the

Re: Spooler change

2005-08-08 Thread Mike Heath
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 18:08 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote: snip One of my notes points to a JMS (ActiveMQ) based spoolmanager. Now that we added derby it would be also easier (ActiveMQ default db is Derby, too). +1 Using ActiveMQ would effectively solve JAMES' clustering problem. It certainly

RE: Spooler change

2005-08-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stefano Bagnara wrote: It also seems orthogonal to a change that uses one thread blocking for the event, and the rest are workers. probably in the JMS environment we would prefer that each worker (consumer) do its own work without the need of a single consumer that dispatch the messages

Re: Spooler change

2005-08-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara
One of my notes points to a JMS (ActiveMQ) based spoolmanager. Now that we added derby it would be also easier (ActiveMQ default db is Derby, too). +1 Using ActiveMQ would effectively solve JAMES' clustering problem. It certainly solves the synchronization problem at hand and

Re: Spooler change

2005-08-08 Thread Serge Knystautas
On 8/8/05, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Using ActiveMQ would effectively solve JAMES' clustering problem. It certainly solves the synchronization problem at hand and solves a number of other deeper problems. I'm not sure I have enough time but I'll try to set-up a

Possible solution to SPAM in James

2005-08-08 Thread Andres QuiƱones
The solution is to authenticate messages in James by digital signatures with an authority, this solution is the idea for my Thesis in the University. So I want to know if there is any developer working in this solution or anyone can help me developing this solution. Or someone has an idea to be

RE: ** PLEASE TEST **

2005-08-08 Thread Chris Means
I guess I can't just click the link to get the code g The requested URL /repos/asf/james/server/branches/merger_v2_and_trunk was not found on this server. Do I need to install a subversion client first? -Original Message- From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,