To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project james-server has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
Hi all,
I just saw this on the ietf list.
If anyone have specific suggestions about #3,#4 and #5 please speak now,
so we can send a single report before december the 10th.
Stefano
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dave Crocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: gmane.ietf.general
> To: <[
On Dec 2, 2007 6:32 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> > to cheer myself up after missing the london train today and missing
> > OSJam, i've been playing around with embedding ActiveMQ (apache's JMS
> > server) within JAMES. i've only really spend a
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Dec 2 15:11:49 2007
New Revision: 600407
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600407&view=rev
Log:
Simplify tracking. UID tracker is now a part of the mailbox.
Removed:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailboxmanager/tracking/MailboxC
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Dec 2 14:14:17 2007
New Revision: 600388
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600388&view=rev
Log:
Removed mailbox unused rename and delete events.
Modified:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailboxmanager/MailboxListener.java
ja
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Dec 2 13:29:52 2007
New Revision: 600377
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600377&view=rev
Log:
Failed to commit everything. Switch to only one instance of MailboxManager.
Factory now extends TorqueMailboxManager. Not particularly satisfactory in the
long run but p
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Dec 2 13:25:10 2007
New Revision: 600376
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600376&view=rev
Log:
Switch to only one instance of MailboxManager. Factory now extends
TorqueMailboxManager. Not particularly satisfactory in the long run but
preserves compatibility for no
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> to cheer myself up after missing the london train today and missing
> OSJam, i've been playing around with embedding ActiveMQ (apache's JMS
> server) within JAMES. i've only really spend an hour or two on it but
> it looks good so far.
>
> use cases:
>
> 1. eas
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Dec 2 10:22:07 2007
New Revision: 600352
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600352&view=rev
Log:
Mailbox is no longer per user.
Modified:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailboxmanager/impl/DefaultMailboxManagerProvider.java
j
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Dec 1, 2007 6:12 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>>> On Dec 1, 2007 6:17 AM, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Freitag, den 30.11.2007, 20:55 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> why don't w
On Nov 30, 2007 7:22 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since I expect to have time at the end of the year, I intend to branch from
> the last known good release and prepare a release build with at least a few
> fixes.
>
> On my list are:
>
> - fixing the long standing memory leak so
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Dec 2 08:15:28 2007
New Revision: 600324
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600324&view=rev
Log:
Removed unused methods
Modified:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailboxmanager/impl/DefaultMailboxManagerProvider.java
james/ser
On Dec 1, 2007 6:12 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>
> > On Dec 1, 2007 6:17 AM, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Am Freitag, den 30.11.2007, 20:55 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> >>> why don't we use "resources" also for config file
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Dec 2 07:06:18 2007
New Revision: 600306
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600306&view=rev
Log:
VirtualMailbox is a good idea but ATM only one functioned implementation exists
so virtualisation is pointless. Removal this now will made refactoring easier.
Should be
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Dec 2 06:34:56 2007
New Revision: 600297
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600297&view=rev
Log:
Removed methods without full implementations.
Modified:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailboxmanager/mailbox/ImapMailboxSession.java
The original and simple idea of using JMS as a means to inject Mail
into James' processors seems good to me, it would open up James to the
JEE audience. I was about to embark on the exact same experiment, so
thanks Robert.
The source of the message can be the James SMTP service, Fetchmail or
any n
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Dec 2 05:50:30 2007
New Revision: 600288
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600288&view=rev
Log:
Removed outline only implementations.
Removed:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailboxmanager/mailstore/MailStoreMailboxManager.java
On Dec 2, 2007 10:50 AM, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds really intressting to me.. I never used JMS so im not a big help
> here :-/
JMS expertise is not required :-)
i'm sure you'll be able to pick up the JMS you need really quickly.
the only difficult bit will be concurrency f
Sounds really intressting to me.. I never used JMS so im not a big help
here :-/
bye
Norman
Am Sonntag, den 02.12.2007, 08:12 + schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
> On Dec 2, 2007 12:05 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> > > > A generic base class fo
On Dec 1, 2007 11:28 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > what are the real-world use cases for using JMS as that method, and
> > > how would it improve on JavaMail or a simple wrapper around it?
>
> > by not having to run
On Dec 2, 2007 12:05 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> > > A generic base class for [posting to a JMS destination],
> > > with an abstract createMessage method, would let people
> > > create their own subclass to provide whatever ad-hoc JMS
> > > messag
On Dec 2, 2007 2:30 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > > ActiveMQ has good spring integration. it's a lot of work tapping
> > > > it's power within phoenix.
> > > OSGi, as JSR-291, is the emerged standard for JSE. Felix
22 matches
Mail list logo
