Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-04 Thread Serge Knystautas
On 1/4/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/4/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree with everything you say, particularly about dialogue. I think Noel's original comment was only meant to highlight the fact that this dialogue should be public. James might be held back

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-04 Thread Danny Angus
On 1/4/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree with everything you say, particularly about dialogue. I think Noel's original comment was only meant to highlight the fact that this dialogue should be public. James might be held back if we make it difficult for people to innovate, bu

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-04 Thread Joachim Draeger
Am Mittwoch, den 03.01.2007, 22:59 + schrieb Danny Angus: > I believe that proposals thrashed out in the sandbox area are good, > and can go places where we wouldn't want James to go, they can ask > more questions than they answer. > > But... this project does still exist through the mailing

RE: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-03 Thread Steve Brewin
Danny Angus wrote: > > > As I'm being quoted please read my comment at the bottom... > > On 1/2/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > I see all of the work here, and Norman explained on Skype > what he and > > > Stefano are doing, but this is not the way th

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-03 Thread Danny Angus
As I'm being quoted please read my comment at the bottom... On 1/2/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: > I see all of the work here, and Norman explained on Skype what he and > Stefano are doing, but this is not the way that we develop code. Please > correct me

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-02 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Some pmc member already declared he was unable to follow server-dev for the last weeks, so I thought it was better to avoid to overflow people buffers. prefixing works very well elsewhere: just put [exp] (or whatever) in the subject so people know to ignore that thread. - robert Good point! S

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-02 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 1/2/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 1/2/07, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 1/1/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Much code has been written in hurry, with the simple goal to create a >> > strawman implementat

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-02 Thread Stefano Bagnara
robert burrell donkin wrote: On 1/2/07, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/1/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Much code has been written in hurry, with the simple goal to create a > strawman implementation. Details and a much better review can be done > after a prop

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-02 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 1/2/07, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/1/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Much code has been written in hurry, with the simple goal to create a > strawman implementation. Details and a much better review can be done > after a proposal will be done IF we'll hav

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-02 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Serge Knystautas wrote: On 1/1/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Much code has been written in hurry, with the simple goal to create a strawman implementation. Details and a much better review can be done after a proposal will be done IF we'll have agreement on the solution. Pleas

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-01 Thread Serge Knystautas
On 1/1/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Much code has been written in hurry, with the simple goal to create a strawman implementation. Details and a much better review can be done after a proposal will be done IF we'll have agreement on the solution. Please make the effort to be i

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-01 Thread Norman Maurer
Mornin, I allready told you that it is an experiment. Nothing complete yet.. We not have found the solution yet we both happy with, thats why we not start a PROPOSAL and start workin on something to do some experiments ( thats why the sandbox is called handlerapi-experiment). Why you start complai

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-01 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman wrote: I see all of the work here, and Norman explained on Skype what he and Stefano are doing, but this is not the way that we develop code. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I do not see a single message, much less a discussion, of the ideas, plans, etc., for this code. No

Experimental Handler Branch

2007-01-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
I see all of the work here, and Norman explained on Skype what he and Stefano are doing, but this is not the way that we develop code. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I do not see a single message, much less a discussion, of the ideas, plans, etc., for this code. As I understand it, the gist