Re: Experimental Handler Branch

Am Mittwoch, den 03.01.2007, 22:59 + schrieb Danny Angus: I believe that proposals thrashed out in the sandbox area are good, and can go places where we wouldn't want James to go, they can ask more questions than they answer. But... this project does still exist through the mailing

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

On 1/4/07, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/4/07, Joachim Draeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree with everything you say, particularly about dialogue. I think Noel's original comment was only meant to highlight the fact that this dialogue should be public. James might be held back if

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

As I'm being quoted please read my comment at the bottom... On 1/2/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: I see all of the work here, and Norman explained on Skype what he and Stefano are doing, but this is not the way that we develop code. Please correct me if

RE: Experimental Handler Branch

Danny Angus wrote: As I'm being quoted please read my comment at the bottom... On 1/2/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: I see all of the work here, and Norman explained on Skype what he and Stefano are doing, but this is not the way that we develop

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

On 1/2/07, Serge Knystautas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/1/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Much code has been written in hurry, with the simple goal to create a strawman implementation. Details and a much better review can be done after a proposal will be done IF we'll have

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

robert burrell donkin wrote: On 1/2/07, Serge Knystautas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/1/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Much code has been written in hurry, with the simple goal to create a strawman implementation. Details and a much better review can be done after a proposal

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

On 1/2/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: On 1/2/07, Serge Knystautas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/1/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Much code has been written in hurry, with the simple goal to create a strawman implementation. Details

Re: Experimental Handler Branch

Some pmc member already declared he was unable to follow server-dev for the last weeks, so I thought it was better to avoid to overflow people buffers. prefixing works very well elsewhere: just put [exp] (or whatever) in the subject so people know to ignore that thread. - robert Good point!