On 7/11/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/11/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin-2 wrote:
On 5/31/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm planning to use a buffer (even a mapped one if using nio) to load
larger chunks of the
On 7/11/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It took me about 4 hours to create the patch for MIME4J-19. (Pull parser
API) Given my experiences with commons-fileupload, I believe it would take
another 6 hours or so to rewrite MIME4J-19 a second time in order to use a
single, buffered
On 7/11/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin-2 wrote:
On 5/31/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm planning to use a buffer (even a mapped one if using nio) to load
larger chunks of the message being parsed. The parser can then look
ahead in the
On 6/19/07, Serge Knystautas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/13/07, Serge Knystautas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/12/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
preferable MIME ones (attachments, mails forwarded as MIME
attachments) plus
outlook's stupid HTML format. the content is
On 6/12/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
preferable MIME ones (attachments, mails forwarded as MIME attachments) plus
outlook's stupid HTML format. the content is not important (i've been using
the apache license). the main thing is that they have been contributed to
the ASF
On 6/10/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i plan to create and send emails of various kinds to myself using
various clients for use in functional testing. maybe of these would be
useful for testing common cases.
BTW i don't use m$ so if anyone else so contributions sent from
On 6/12/07, Serge Knystautas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/10/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i plan to create and send emails of various kinds to myself using
various clients for use in functional testing. maybe of these would be
useful for testing common cases.
BTW i
On 6/7/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jukka Zitting ha scritto:
Hi,
By the way, do we have somewhere a good set of test messages I could
use when testing my Mime4j modifications?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
I attached here the messages I removed (for copyright issues)
Andrew C. Oliver ha scritto:
although you can't use it (due to Apache's anti-LGPL dogma)
http://blog.buni.org/blog/mbarker/Meldware/2007/06/04/Panto-0-4-release-Still-really-fast
I suggest looking at the technique used by Buni's panto.
Hi Andrew,
I didn't think at it before, but
Hi,
On 6/7/07, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
although you can't use it (due to Apache's anti-LGPL dogma)
http://blog.buni.org/blog/mbarker/Meldware/2007/06/04/Panto-0-4-release-Still-really-fast
I suggest looking at the technique used by Buni's panto.
Thanks for the tip! I
Hi,
By the way, do we have somewhere a good set of test messages I could
use when testing my Mime4j modifications?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
Andrew C. Oliver ha scritto:
although you can't use it (due to Apache's anti-LGPL dogma)
http://blog.buni.org/blog/mbarker/Meldware/2007/06/04/Panto-0-4-release-Still-really-fast
I suggest looking at the technique used by Buni's panto.
Hi Andrew,
I didn't
On 6/7/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 6/7/07, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
although you can't use it (due to Apache's anti-LGPL dogma)
http://blog.buni.org/blog/mbarker/Meldware/2007/06/04/Panto-0-4-release-Still-really-fast
I suggest looking at the
Hi,
I've been looking at MIME4J-5 and I have a few ideas on how to speed
up parsing. However, I'm not sure about how the underlying mime stream
should be treated. I would use a lookahead buffer but that would leave
the underlying stream in an undefined state for example when parsing
is stopped
Can you please elaborate what a lookahead buffer is ?
bye
Norman
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 17:08 +0300 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
Hi,
I've been looking at MIME4J-5 and I have a few ideas on how to speed
up parsing. However, I'm not sure about how the underlying mime stream
should be
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking at MIME4J-5 and I have a few ideas on how to speed
up parsing. However, I'm not sure about how the underlying mime stream
should be treated. I would use a lookahead buffer but that would leave
the underlying stream in an undefined state for example
On 5/31/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 5/31/07, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please elaborate what a lookahead buffer is ?
I'm planning to use a buffer (even a mapped one if using nio) to load
larger chunks of the message being parsed. The parser can then
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 17:23 +0100 schrieb robert burrell
donkin:
On 5/31/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 5/31/07, Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please elaborate what a lookahead buffer is ?
I'm planning to use a buffer (even a mapped one if
18 matches
Mail list logo
