Re: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-26 Thread Norman Maurer
Hi, do you use any custom mailet ? Cheers, Norman Am Dienstag, den 26.08.2008, 01:23 -0400 schrieb Vance, Trevor K.: > Greetings, > > I have several Unix hosts sending mail with uuencoded attachments > through James v2.3.1 as a SMTP relay. Mail with no attachments work > great, Windows hosts s

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-26 Thread Vance, Trevor K.
To: James Users List Subject: Re: A problem with uuencoded attachments Hi, do you use any custom mailet ? Cheers, Norman Am Dienstag, den 26.08.2008, 01:23 -0400 schrieb Vance, Trevor K.: > Greetings, > > I have several Unix hosts sending mail with uuencoded attachments > through J

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-27 Thread Vance, Trevor K.
ww.blat.net Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: test1 test begin 644 test.txt &=&5S=`T* ` end . 250 2.6.0 Message received <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 12:37 PM

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-27 Thread Martijn Brinkers
the same email is sent through a different SMTP server (i.e. not > JAMES), the attachment is preserved. > > Kind regards, > Trevor > > > -Original Message- > From: Norman Maurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 12:37 PM > To: Jame

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-27 Thread Vance, Trevor K.
>From: Martijn Brinkers >Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 1:44 PM >To: James Users List >Cc: Vance, Trevor K. >Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments > >Could you sent a complete example message? > >The example DATA portion (below) you show seems not to se

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-27 Thread Martijn Brinkers
nesday, August 27, 2008 1:44 PM > >To: James Users List > >Cc: Vance, Trevor K. > >Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments > > > >Could you sent a complete example message? > > > >The example DATA portion (below) you show seems not to separate the

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-27 Thread Vance, Trevor K.
James Users List Cc: Vance, Trevor K. Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments Sending a uuencoded message seems to work with my setup. What I still don't get is why there is not an empty line (ie only CR-LF) between subject and body? see your log Martijn On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 16:53 -0

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-27 Thread Martijn Brinkers
ECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 2:29 PM > To: James Users List > Cc: Vance, Trevor K. > Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments > > Sending a uuencoded message seems to work with my setup. > > What I still don't get is why there is not an empty li

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-27 Thread Vance, Trevor K.
ived.. <<>>putline>>> QUIT -Original Message- From: Martijn Brinkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: Vance, Trevor K. Cc: James Users List Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments Well it's kind of strange that ther

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-27 Thread Martijn Brinkers
t; > > > Trevor > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Martijn Brinkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 2:29 PM > > To: James Users List > > Cc: Vance, Trevor K. > > Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachment

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-27 Thread Martijn Brinkers
bug: 00010 65 20 72 65 63 65 69 76 65 64 0D 0A e > received.. > << superDebug: Attempting to send 6 bytes: > superDebug: 00000 51 55 49 54 0D 0A > QUIT.. > >>>putline>>> QUIT > > -Original Message- > From: Martijn

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-28 Thread Vance, Trevor K.
> -Original Message- > From: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:58 AM > To: James Users List > Subject: Re: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments > > If the smtp server is only used to relay a message the > specif

Re: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-28 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Vance, Trevor K. ha scritto: -Original Message- From: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:58 AM To: James Users List Subject: Re: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments If the smtp server is only used to relay a message the specification say

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-09-03 Thread Vance, Trevor K.
> -Original Message- > From: Martijn Brinkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 12:50 AM > To: James Users List > Cc: Vance, Trevor K. > Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments > > I still do not understand what your actu

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-09-03 Thread Martijn Brinkers
If I sent the following message through James I can open the message and see the attached image. James only adds a few headers, nothing more nothing less. So what happens in your case? Martijn To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: uu encode test James From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 begin 6

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-09-03 Thread Vance, Trevor K.
The attachment is not processed. It's received as plain text Trevor > -Original Message- > From: Martijn Brinkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 8:06 AM > To: Vance, Trevor K. > Cc: James Users List > Subject: RE: A problem wit

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-09-03 Thread Martijn Brinkers
evor K. > > Cc: James Users List > > Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments > > > > If I sent the following message through James I can open the > > message and see the attached image. James only adds a few > > headers, nothing more nothing less

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-09-03 Thread Vance, Trevor K.
uuencoded attachment comes through as expected (word doc, graphic, etc) > -Original Message- > From: Martijn Brinkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 8:22 AM > To: Vance, Trevor K. > Cc: James Users List > Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-09-03 Thread Martijn Brinkers
eMailbox > -> Outlook > The uuencoded attachment comes through as expected (word doc, graphic, > etc) > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Martijn Brinkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 8:22 AM > > To:

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-09-03 Thread Vance, Trevor K.
-Original Message- > From: Martijn Brinkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 9:00 AM > To: Vance, Trevor K. > Cc: James Users List > Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments > > But what I'm interested in is the actual source

RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-09-03 Thread Vance, Trevor K.
le sending mails." I'm not sure if this helps or hinders the path to resolution, but there it is. Trevor -Original Message- From: Martijn Brinkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 9:00 AM To: Vance, Trevor K. Cc: James Users List Subject: RE: A problem

Re: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments

2008-08-28 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Vance, Trevor K. ha scritto: Martijn, I think this should satisfy. Though I believe the issue is still in my James config, and not in the mailer. My reasoning here is that if I send the same file/command to a different SMTP server, the attachment comes through preserved. If the smtp server i