On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:52:32 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there
>> are other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot.
>> Some of them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a
>> di
> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there are
> other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot. Some of
> them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a directed
> test for the JDK-8287061 code and a more brute force t
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:52:32 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there
>> are other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot.
>> Some of them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a
>> di
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:52:32 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there
>> are other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot.
>> Some of them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a
>> di
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 20:02:44 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> It's not -v that is making it do that. It does it without -v also. It can be
>> a very slow operation, and I recently was running into cases where even
>> after 10 minutes it was not done, so I gave up waiting. I'm about to file a
>> CR
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:52:32 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there
>> are other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot.
>> Some of them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a
>> di
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:52:32 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there
>> are other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot.
>> Some of them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a
>> di
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:52:47 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> No. ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge is using `jstack -v` which doesn't work with
>> ZGC because the `-v` part needs to iterate the heap looking for
>> AbstractQueuedSynchronizers which doesn't work with ZGC and the SA.
>
> It's not -v that is
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:44:38 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList-generational-zgc.txt line 108:
>>
>>> 106: serviceability/sa/sadebugd/ClhsdbAttachToDebugServer.java 8307393
>>> generic-all
>>> 107: serviceability/sa/sadebugd/ClhsdbTestConnectArgument.java 8307
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:34:29 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Tom Rodriguez has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove testdebuginfodecode command
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/sa/TestDebugInfoDecode.java line 109:
>
>>
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:35:39 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there
>> are other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot.
>> Some of them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a
>> di
> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there are
> other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot. Some of
> them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a directed
> test for the JDK-8287061 code and a more brute force t
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:40:03 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Tom Rodriguez has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove testdebuginfodecode command
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList-generational-zgc.txt line 108:
>
>> 106: servi
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 22:47:04 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Tom Rodriguez has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Update
>> src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/code/NMethod.java
>>
>>Co-authored-by: Andre
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:35:39 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there
>> are other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot.
>> Some of them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a
>> di
> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there are
> other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot. Some of
> them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a directed
> test for the JDK-8287061 code and a more brute force t
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 22:36:55 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Tom Rodriguez has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Update
>> src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/code/NMethod.java
>>
>>Co-authored-by: Andre
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:03:03 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there
>> are other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot.
>> Some of them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a
>> di
> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there are
> other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot. Some of
> them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a directed
> test for the JDK-8287061 code and a more brute force t
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 05:37:02 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there
>> are other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot.
>> Some of them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a
>> di
> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there are
> other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot. Some of
> them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a directed
> test for the JDK-8287061 code and a more brute force t
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 21:46:13 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Tom Rodriguez has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix problem list and correct jtreg arguments
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.jav
> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there are
> other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot. Some of
> them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a directed
> test for the JDK-8287061 code and a more brute force t
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 21:26:36 GMT, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there are
> other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot. Some of
> them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a directed
The changes for JDK-8287061 didn't update the SA decoding logic and there are
other places where the decoding has gotten out of sync with HotSpot. Some of
them can't be tested because they are part of JVMCI but I've added a directed
test for the JDK-8287061 code and a more brute force test that
25 matches
Mail list logo
