G60 Supercharged (possibly revived?)
1984 Nissan 200SX Turbo
1985 Nissan 200SX Turbo
1983 Datsun 280ZX Turbo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SD dual
, just turned 30k miles
'70 HEMI Road Runner, B5/B5, 4spd, project
www.sandysgarage.com
www.garagecams.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SD dual
In a message dated 10/27/2004 10:31:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
actually i feel the need to raise the B.S. flag on this one before someone
actually tries to do this and either gets physically hurt, or pissed off
that
they will have to cut and install a tranny
, WI. Member ExtremePSI, SDAC
- Original Message -
From: Mullikin, Stefan P [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SDML(Shelby List)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11:30 AM
Subject: RE: SD dual engine handling
There was also a dual engined Mini built back when
Well, to get things back more onto Shelby Dodge turbos, I'll point out
that the comments Stefan made below illustrate one of the larger
advantages to a twin engine AWD setup. Each of the trannies was designed
to be strong enough to handle the whole car on its own, so two means the
whole setup is
I've seen pictures of one of these. I can imagine it spinning out on
turns. No thanks :)
-J Southern California Forced Induction
1989 Dodge Daytona Shelby Turbo II
1986 Chrysler Laser XE Turbo
1990 Plymouth Laser RS Turbo
1991 Mitsu Eclispe GSX Turbo(for sale)
1990 VW Corrado G60 Supercharged
, October 27, 2004 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mullikin, Stefan P
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SD dual engine
I've seen pictures of one of these. I can imagine it spinning out on
turns. No thanks :)
-J Southern California Forced Induction
1989 Dodge Daytona Shelby Turbo II
1986
]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mullikin, Stefan P
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SD dual engine
In a message dated 10/27/2004 1:01:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've seen pictures of one of these. I can imagine it spinning
- -Original Message-
I `ve seen the v8 conversion done and they`re actually was no cutting .
Using the small rearend from a dakota or older duster.You have to make a
custom driveshaft,and the transmission fit into the tunell w/o
cutting.You have to fab up the motor mounts. You have to
Just thinking out loud here but wouldn't a dual engine car need to be set up
perfectly to handle well? What I mean is, you may need to somehow link the two
outputs together so that the transmission of power is equal to the front and
rear. If the rear is pushing slightly harder in a turn than
So now if we consider that you can weld in the entire inner engine bay
into the rear of, say, a G body, you would then have ready-to-go shock
towers which covers the basic suspension fab needs. All you do then is
fashion joints for the A-arm. Hmmm do you use a front sway bar in the
rear?
But what
the car is moving or you will hose up a trans.
Point is: Not a great daily driver.
Chad-
- Original Message -
From: Jason Arroyo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sdml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:46 AM
Subject: RE: SD dual engine
But what about electronics? How does
- Original Message -
From: Jason Arroyo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sdml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:46 AM
Subject: RE: SD dual engine
So now if we consider that you can weld in the entire inner engine bay
into the rear of, say, a G body, you would then have ready
vehicles to
run at their events. This is one of the reasons multi-engined cars
don't run at the GRM Challenge.
Stefan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Arroyo
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:08 AM
To: sdml
Subject: RE: SD dual engine
PROTECTED]
To: sdml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: SD dual engine
Alright, why not replace the rack altogether with a solid beam, bent to
shape? Sorta like how we replace the bobble struts with solid dogbones.
Two dashes? As in for the tach and dummy
I'm thinking now that those aftermarket gauge cluster packages from
Autometer and other companies (that includes tach and speedo, oil
pressure, water, etc.) is a good deal, and would make mounting, say
above the glove compartment and at an angle (say 35-45 degrees), a snap,
and cover your
If you want 8 cylinders, get a V8.
Richard Paul
---REMOVE-FOOTER-WHEN-REPLYING
Questions? Visit http://www.sdml.org/
To be removed, visit http://www.sdml.org/pages/leave.html
In a message dated 10/26/2004 12:50:14 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So now if we consider that you can weld in the entire inner engine bay
into the rear of, say, a G body, you would then have ready-to-go shock
towers which covers the basic suspension fab needs. All you do
18 matches
Mail list logo
