On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Matt Lepinski mlepin...@bbn.com wrote:
Terry,
On 3/27/2012 4:22 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:
I feel like the Monday meeting was a bit of a lost opportunity. I
appreciate
see previous gzip compression message :( I think we tried to stuff
8hrs of content into
fyi..
The validator implementers have also discussed some of the common problems that
we see now, and other ways to distribute the rpki data over the past days. We
have some more thoughts on this, but I am not sure that we agree yet. I would
like to talk between us a tiny bit more to avoid
2) would having these coincident with existing events and ~1/month
be acceptable to the majority
we (everyone involved) do know that not everyone can make every
meeting... aiming for best participation level is the goal.
-chris
[WEG] Avoiding some number of messages saying can't/can
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Samuel Weiler
[wei...@watson.org]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 11:14 AM
To: Christopher Morrow
Cc: sidr-cha...@ietf.org; sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting Dates/Locations (Proposed)
I am content
On 26 Mar 2012, at 16:43, Christopher Morrow wrote:
So, as stated in the meeting today, and in these slides:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-sidr-8.pdf
There is a proposal to schedule 5 future Interim Face to Face
(+virtual) meetings. The dates/locations are:
Mon
At 10:43 AM -0400 3/26/12, Christopher Morrow wrote:
So, as stated in the meeting today, and in these slides:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-sidr-8.pdf
There is a proposal to schedule 5 future Interim Face to Face
(+virtual) meetings. The dates/locations are:
Mon Apr 30
I support the idea of rapid progress through frequent interim meetings.
However, in order to make this work, we really need to make virtual
participation more successful than we did at the May meeting in San Diego.
On 3/26/2012 10:43 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Mon Apr 30 - after ARIN (IAD)
So, as stated in the meeting today, and in these slides:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-sidr-8.pdf
There is a proposal to schedule 5 future Interim Face to Face
(+virtual) meetings. The dates/locations are:
Mon Apr 30 - after ARIN (IAD)
Wed Jun 6 - NANOG (YVR)
Fri Jun 29 -
Mon Apr 30 - after ARIN (IAD)
Wed Jun 6 - NANOG (YVR)
Fri Jun 29 - (BWI/IAD)
Fri Jul 27 - prior to IETF84 (YVR)
Sun Sep 23 - prior to RIPE (AMS)
i will try to attend in person
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
I am content to have interim meetings iff the WG commits to improving
the technical facilities for remote participants. That was fumbled
badly at the San Diego interim meeting and moderately badly today.
We need to do better.
To encourage us to do better, I suggest that the first of these
I think that you silently discarded my email:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04215.html
Anyhow I wasn't expecting too much, but I least I tried.
Regards,
.as
On 26 Mar 2012, at 16:43, Christopher Morrow wrote:
So, as stated in the meeting today,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Arturo Servin aser...@lacnic.net wrote:
I think that you silently discarded my email:
I didn't, I may not have read it ;(
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04215.html
Anyhow I wasn't expecting too much, but I least I tried.
The October
No worries.
Thanks,
.as
On 26 Mar 2012, at 18:13, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Arturo Servin aser...@lacnic.net wrote:
I think that you silently discarded my email:
I didn't, I may not have read it ;(
On #3, I really like the idea of having interim meetings close to events
that are essentially operator-centric meetings. If this WG is in fact
going to have protocols/boxes deployed/run by operator folk, it'd be
really good to make it easy as possible for them to attend. I know some
attend
14 matches
Mail list logo
