Re: [SIESTA-L] WRONG LOCAL MAGNETIC MOMENT OF Fe IN FeO.

2016-12-02 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
. Even for U=6 eV there is no band-gap. Can anyone please help me in resolving this issue? I have tried my best but didn't understand where is it wrong. I am looking forward for some suggestions. Please help me out. Here is the attached .fdf file. On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Anju Saroha

Re: [SIESTA-L] WRONG LOCAL MAGNETIC MOMENT OF Fe IN FeO.

2016-11-25 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
Sorry I forgot to attach the input file. I am attaching the FeO.fdf file herewith. Please find the attachment. On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Anju Saroha wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using siesta-trunk-527. I did a test run on FeO to check the > installation. But I have encounte

[SIESTA-L] WRONG LOCAL MAGNETIC MOMENT OF Fe IN FeO.

2016-11-25 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
-- Anju Saroha Research scholar IIT Madras Chennai-600036 India.

[SIESTA-L] U parameter

2016-11-19 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
BANDS-# COOP.Write .true. WFS.Write.For.Bands.true. #---END-OF-FILE---# Thanks in advance. I am looking forward for suggestions. -- Anju Saroha Research Scholar Department of Physics IIT Madras Ch

Re: [SIESTA-L] PDOS

2016-07-16 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
and I need to plot the PDOS for t2g > and eg of Ni- 3d orbital. As far as I know we can either plot for complete > 3d i.e all m values or each individual m values. > > I need to know how we can plot it for eg and t2g separately. > > > > Looking forward for some hints in the dir

Re: [SIESTA-L] PDOS

2016-07-16 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
Thanks Leone Carmo Garcia. On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 9:45 PM, leoqmc . wrote: > Dear Anju Saroha, > > I think MPROP program can solve the problem. > > Regards, > > Leone Carmo Garcia > > 2016-07-16 12:54 GMT-03:00 Anju Saroha : > >> Dear siesta users, >>

[SIESTA-L] PDOS

2016-07-16 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
some hints in the direction. Thanks in advance. Regards -- Anju Saroha Research Scholar Prof. M. S. Ramachandra Rao and Dr. B. Ranjit Kumar Nanda's group Department of Physics IIT Madras Chennai-600036

[SIESTA-L] PDOS

2016-07-07 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
anyone faced it before? Thanks and regards -- Anju Saroha Research Scholar Prof. M. S. Ramachandra Rao and Dr. B. Ranjit Kumar Nanda's group Department of Physics IIT Madras Chennai-600036

Re: [SIESTA-L] COMPILATION ERROR

2016-07-01 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
udy on JURECA the gfortran worked > well, so this could be a wise alternative to ifort. > > best > Z > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Anju Saroha wrote: > > Thanks a lot Zeila Zanolli. We don't have Intel 2015. What about Intel > 2011, > > is this versi

Re: [SIESTA-L] COMPILATION ERROR

2016-07-01 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
//workshop.etsf.eu/ > > > > NanoteC16 > > Carbon Nanoscience and Nanotechnology > > 31 August - 03 September 2016, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland > > website: http://nanotec-conference.net/ > > >

Re: [SIESTA-L] COMPILATION ERROR

2016-06-30 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
error before? Please help me in resolving the issue. Looking forward for an help. Thanks and regards Anju Saroha On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Nick Papior wrote: > Please follow these instructions so that we may be able to help you: > > https://answers.launchpad.net/siesta/+faq/2779

Re: [SIESTA-L] COMPILATION ERROR

2016-06-28 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
Dear Nick, Same error is coming with the new version also. What can be a possible way out? On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Anju Saroha wrote: > Thanks a lot Nick. > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Nick Papior wrote: > >> No, currently LDA+U is only in the trunk

Re: [SIESTA-L] COMPILATION ERROR

2016-06-28 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
Thanks a lot Nick. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Nick Papior wrote: > No, currently LDA+U is only in the trunk series. > > 2016-06-28 10:49 GMT+02:00 Anju Saroha : > >> Dear Nick, >> >> That's true. Still may I know whether U is there in any series? &

Re: [SIESTA-L] COMPILATION ERROR

2016-06-28 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
Dear Nick, That's true. Still may I know whether U is there in any series? Thanks On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Nick Papior wrote: > Please, remark that the trunk version is a development version and it > should be treated as such. :) > > 2016-06-28 10:33 GMT+02:00 Anju S

Re: [SIESTA-L] COMPILATION ERROR

2016-06-28 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
Dear Nick, I need to know whether only siesta trunk has LDA+U implementation or any series also have it? On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Anju Saroha wrote: > Dear Nick, > > I have understood it. Now only I have checked. Thanks a lot. > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at

Re: [SIESTA-L] COMPILATION ERROR

2016-06-28 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
Dear Nick, I have understood it. Now only I have checked. Thanks a lot. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Nick Papior wrote: > Please follow this site for the trunk version > https://launchpad.net/siesta > Currently, 526 is the latest version. > > 2016-06-28 10:24 GMT+02

Re: [SIESTA-L] COMPILATION ERROR

2016-06-28 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
tation. > > If siesta still exhibits an error, please follow the steps explained here: > https://answers.launchpad.net/siesta/+faq/2779 > > > 2016-06-27 21:18 GMT+02:00 Anju Saroha : > >> Dear siesta users, >> >> I have installed siesta-trunk-515 using intel-

[SIESTA-L] COMPILATION ERROR

2016-06-27 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
0411C Unknown Unknown Unknownlibc.so.6 7F0CDA0B7C36 UnknownUnknownUnknownsiesta 00404019 Unknown Unknown Unknown* Here I am *attaching the arch.make file*. I am looking forward for a help. Thanks in advance. Regards -- Anju S

Re: [SIESTA-L] Error while running with LDAU option

2016-06-24 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
Hi I have figure out the issue. Thanks. On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Anju Saroha wrote: > Dear Siesta users, > > I am using siesta-trunk-515 and in that I tried a test run for *Fe using > U parameter*. > > While running, it is giving an error *"not enough she

[SIESTA-L] Error while running with LDAU option

2016-06-24 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
x53DB1D in __ldau_specs_MOD_read_ldau_specs #5 0x44BFAE in initatom_ #6 0x4B68A3 in __m_siesta_init_MOD_siesta_init Best regards -- Anju Saroha Research Scholar Department of Physics IIT Madras Chennai-600036 India.

Re: [SIESTA-L] LDA + U calculation

2016-06-12 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
Dear Zeila Zanolli, Thanks a lot for sending me the link. Regards On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Anju Saroha wrote: > Dear Javier, > > In the link which you have send, if I am going to the trunk link, it is > showing as Trunk has no download files. > Sorry to bother you thi

Re: [SIESTA-L] LDA + U calculation

2016-06-12 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
Dear Javier, In the link which you have send, if I am going to the trunk link, it is showing as Trunk has no download files. Sorry to bother you this much but I am so helpless in the case that I have no other option except to ask you. Regards On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Anju Saroha wrote

Re: [SIESTA-L] LDA + U calculation

2016-06-12 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
send me the name of the trunk version. I am not seeing any released version of trunk other than trunk-462. Thanks and regards On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Anju Saroha wrote: > Thanks Javier. > > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Javier Junquera < > javier.junqu..

Re: [SIESTA-L] LDA + U calculation

2016-06-12 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
t; I am really helpless in this situation, please suggest me a solution. > > Thanks and regards > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Anju Saroha wrote: > >> Dear Javier, >> >> Please direct me a way for one more problem, i.e, whether the >> installation command

Re: [SIESTA-L] LDA + U calculation

2016-06-12 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
through the complete manual but I didn't find anything related to U parameter. I am really helpless in this situation, please suggest me a solution. Thanks and regards On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Anju Saroha wrote: > Dear Javier, > > Please direct me a way for one mor

Re: [SIESTA-L] LDA + U calculation

2016-06-10 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
-4.0-b2 also. Thanks and regards Anju Saroha On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Anju Saroha wrote: > Dear Javier, thanks a lot for your valuable suggestion. I will install > this new version. > > Regards > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Javier Junquera < > javier.j

Re: [SIESTA-L] LDA + U calculation

2016-06-10 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
n? Is there any other version of SIESTA which > has included the U parameter in it? > > All sort of suggestions are welcome. > > Thanks and regards > -- > Anju Saroha > Research Scholar > Department of Physics > IIT Madras > Chennai-600036 > India. > > >

[SIESTA-L] LDA + U calculation

2016-06-08 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
LDA+U). Can somebody please suggest a way out of the problem? Is there any problem with siesta-ldau-308 version? Is there any other version of SIESTA which has included the U parameter in it? All sort of suggestions are welcome. Thanks and regards -- Anju Saroha Research Scholar Department of

Re: [SIESTA-L] CHARGE DENSITY PLOT USING DENCHAR

2016-03-03 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
Thanks a lot Alberto Garcia for your valuable suggestion. Regards Anju Saroha On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Alberto Garcia wrote: > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 05:02, Anju Saroha wrote: > > > Dear Siesta users > > > > I am a new user of Siesta and using siesta-trunk

[SIESTA-L] CHARGE DENSITY PLOT USING DENCHAR

2016-03-02 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
ks in advance. Regards Anju Saroha --

[SIESTA-L] MULLIKEN POPULATION

2016-02-09 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
0.001 0.002 0.001 mulliken: Qtot = * 8.000* Can somebody please help me in knowing why the total population in " *overlap* *population between atoms*" and in "*atomic and orbital populations*" are different. All suggestions are welcome. Thanks in advance. -- Anju Saroha

Re: [SIESTA-L] CHARGE DENSITY 3D PLOT

2016-02-06 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
anual. > > On 30 Jan 2016, at 11:35, Anju Saroha wrote: > > > Hi to all, > > > > I am having a doubt in plotting charge density in 3D mode. I tried using > DENCHAR utility program. I want to know how one can plot charge density in > some specific energy ra

[SIESTA-L] CHARGE DENSITY 3D PLOT

2016-01-30 Por tôpico Anju Saroha
the energy range. I am looking forward for the help. Thanks a lot in advance. -- Anju Saroha Research Scholar Department of Physics IIT Madras Chennai-600036 India