Re: [Siglinux] Reply-to = siglinux@utacm.org vote

2004-09-07 Thread Doc Shipley
Omar El-Domeiri wrote: I vote to not munge the reply-to, and I would appreciate if those who think we should change the current behavior to read the following link: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Hey, it's Chip Rosenthal! Oh, wait. He's not President of Teh InturWeb yet. Tha

Re: [Siglinux] Reply-to = siglinux@utacm.org vote

2004-09-07 Thread Scott James Cederberg
I have to say, I'm pretty convinced by the "Considered Harmful" article. I vote to keep things the way they are. Scott ___ Siglinux mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://machito.utacm.org/mailman/listin

Re: [Siglinux] Reply-to = siglinux@utacm.org vote

2004-09-07 Thread Doc Shipley
Ryan Smith wrote: Personally, I don't have an opinion either way I think its a rather petty issue. Possibly true. On the other hand I am of the opinion that a more appropriate place for off-topic threads such as this should be held in the forum, and only announced once to the list. Just my $0

Re: [Siglinux] Reply-to = siglinux@utacm.org vote

2004-09-07 Thread Omar El-Domeiri
I vote to not munge the reply-to, and I would appreciate if those who think we should change the current behavior to read the following link: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html >From what I can tell, those who want to change the behaviour are just unable to use their mailer programs co

Re: [Siglinux] Reply-to = siglinux@utacm.org vote

2004-09-07 Thread Daniel Brown
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 06:04:56PM -0500, Ryan Smith wrote: > On the other hand I am of the opinion that a more appropriate place for > off-topic threads such as this should be held in the forum, and only > announced once to the list. Just my $0.02 I think this thread is very on-topic; it affec

Re: [Siglinux] Reply-to = siglinux@utacm.org vote

2004-09-07 Thread Ryan Smith
Personally, I don't have an opinion either way I think its a rather petty issue. On the other hand I am of the opinion that a more appropriate place for off-topic threads such as this should be held in the forum, and only announced once to the list. Just my $0.02 -R Doc Shipley wrote: I thi

Re: [Siglinux] Reply-to = siglinux@utacm.org vote

2004-09-07 Thread Paul Sack
On Sep 7, 2004, at 5:28 PM, Doc Shipley wrote: Right now the vote stands at about 5-2 for changing reply-top behavior. I vote for changing Reply-to. That's 6-2. ___ Siglinux mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://machito.utacm.org/mailman/listinfo/sigli

Re: [Siglinux] Reply-to = siglinux@utacm.org vote

2004-09-07 Thread Doc Shipley
I think you just proved my point. This discussion directly relates to, and may affect, siglinux. The rest of the list may wish to see your reasoning, and I DID NOT AND DO NOT WISH FOR IT TO BECOME PRIVATE. The topic has not changed at all. I asked if you were voting to keep current behav