I vote to not munge the reply-to, and I would appreciate if those who think we should change the current behavior to read the following link: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>From what I can tell, those who want to change the behaviour are just unable to use their mailer programs correctly, or don't know how to setup procmail to remove duplicate emails. (both of which take less time than responding to this thread) -Omar On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 18:51:31 -0500, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 06:04:56PM -0500, Ryan Smith wrote: > > On the other hand I am of the opinion that a more appropriate place for > > off-topic threads such as this should be held in the forum, and only > > announced once to the list. Just my $0.02 > > I think this thread is very on-topic; it affects the way every > subscriber interacts with the list. > > > > danb > > -- > Daniel Brown > www.utacm.org > www.cs.utexas.edu > _______________________________________________ > Siglinux mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://machito.utacm.org/mailman/listinfo/siglinux > _______________________________________________ Siglinux mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://machito.utacm.org/mailman/listinfo/siglinux
