On 16 Oct 2008 at 8:02, Paula wrote about :
Subject : CSCS Yeast/fungi
I've been battling excessive itching/scratching on two of my dogs for
over a year and am getting nowhere. I finally had a vet come to the
snip
Hi Paula,
It could be mange which is causing the itching, in which case
About all there is is
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer for total silver content...no
details between ionic and colloidal. $200 fixer upper - $250,000
Malvern particle sizer ~ $40,000 ..no details on what the particles are
Some sort of microscope
Making the same point, theory is theory.
How does sunlight change pure ionic silver into something else?
What is the alleged mechanism?
The theory was stated as existing, but nothing about what the theory says
except the conclusion.
I've sent samples to several labs..only one
At 09:41 AM 10/18/2008 -0400, you wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 09:27:55AM -0400, Faith Gagne wrote:
Dear N.
I don't use anything to 'measure' the CS I use. I'd like to have
something for this purpose. I think Ode sells a meter of some sort.
Faith G.
Ah, interesting. :)
## Why is
No I don't think it can be compared to religion Neville, because the
benefits of EIS are absolutely provable. When my face swelled up like
the elephant man in a matter of minutes, and swallowing EIS every ten
minutes for two hours brought it completely down again, *that's* proof
that it
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 06:57:56AM -0400, Ode Coyote wrote:
Making the same point, theory is theory.
How does sunlight change pure ionic silver into something else?
Perhaps more to the point, how does one verify they have pure ionic silver?
What is the alleged mechanism?
This has
You totally missed my point, which was that anything can be argued to death,
not whether something works or not!
N.
- Original Message -
From: Dee d...@deetroy.org
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: CSblue moons revisited
No I don't think
Hi group, Indi, Ken,
The current debate (happily, I can still use that word to describe the
discussion; thank you for staying civil, guys...) about alleged
absolute statements and proof seems to have originated in a few
sentences posted days ago in the blue moons revisited thread:
Indi wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:07:24 -5
M. G. Devour mdev...@eskimo.com wrote:
Hi group, Indi, Ken,
The current debate (happily, I can still use that word to describe
the discussion; thank you for staying civil, guys...) about alleged
absolute statements and proof seems to have originated in a few
Anyway, thanks for pointing out my misstatements. I will be more
careful about that in the future. Not sure if you read the whole
discussion though, as there was a lot of email I never got the last
couple of days and I have no way of knowing if all the email I sent got
through. I think it was
(even though I was stunned to see my rather large and private email to
Mike appear in this forum for all to see)
Due to my inexperience with email forums the above quote was posted on October
19 and was submitted with the mistaken belief it had appeared in the public
forum when in fact it was
11 matches
Mail list logo
