March 17, 2004
"...The judgment and order entered March 4 returns control of
the firm to its owners...the judgment amount was set at
$120 million, the government will be content with collecting
$3 million..."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?E4B7155C7
jr
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for
Local update:
7/17/03
Seasilver agrees to warn consumers about its product
EDMOND JACOBY---Staff Writer
"Seasilver USA...has agreed to the terms of a court order
that includes a declaration that the company's nutritional
supplement has little or no value in the treatment of cancer,
diabetes
http://www.silver-lightning.com
Marshall
tomy thomson wrote:
> Marshall, whats your site address
>
> --- Marshall Dudley wrote: > Or
> maybe they are following the advise of a lawyer
> > that has the notion that the
> > Federal government has to follow the laws. I had my
> > site approved by
believed" and so on?
>
I don't know, and certainly don't have the money to test that. They said
I could not even relate any true experiences anyone had had either.
Marshall
>
> Arnold
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Marshall Dudley"
> To:
Marshall, whats your site address
--- Marshall Dudley wrote: > Or
maybe they are following the advise of a lawyer
> that has the notion that the
> Federal government has to follow the laws. I had my
> site approved by an attorney
> and doctor who said that there was nothing illegal
> on it an
ualifying
> phrases" such as "it is widely believed" and so on?
>
> Arnold
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Marshall Dudley"
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 5:30 PM
> Subject: Re: CS>Re: FTC seizes Seasilver
>
> > Or
sol wrote:
>
> Its interesting that Seasilver were warned and did not cease or
> provide whatever proof of whatever they were supposed to to the feds.
> There is a somewhat similar case going on with Pet Medicine Chest,
> which has been under, now, two separate court orders (the first over a
>
jrowl...@nctimes.net]
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 4:45 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>Re: FTC seizes Seasilver
> Do you imply that this may have been a set-up for a precedent to get
> others?
No, my first thought was maybe Seasilver, for whatever reason, WANTS to be a
test-case
-
From: "Marshall Dudley"
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Re: FTC seizes Seasilver
> Or maybe they are following the advise of a lawyer that has the
notion that the
> Federal government has to follow the laws. I had my site approved
by an attorney
>
Or maybe they are following the advise of a lawyer that has the notion that the
Federal government has to follow the laws. I had my site approved by an
attorney
and doctor who said that there was nothing illegal on it and the government
could
not do anything about it, only to get a letter from t
Its interesting that Seasilver were warned and did not cease or
provide whatever proof of whatever they were supposed to to the feds.
There is a somewhat similar case going on with Pet Medicine Chest,
which has been under, now, two separate court orders (the first over a
year ago I believe) to ce
> Do you imply that this may have been a set-up for a precedent to get others?
No, my first thought was maybe Seasilver, for whatever reason, WANTS to
be a
test-case, as they were clearly warned and there's very big bucks
involved.
So far, it just does not make sense, especially to the 400+ laid-o
Do you imply that this may have been a set-up for a precedent to get others?
JOH
-Original Message-
From: jrowl...@nctimes.net [mailto:jrowl...@nctimes.net]
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 4:08 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>Re: FTC seizes Seasilver
Today's local
Today's local paper's update (city of Carlsbad is next-door). Andy, I
think the reporter's reference to the '02 warning letter is due to your
find, as I e-mailed
him the reference. It seems almost like they were trying to "get
caught" and
neither the Seasilver principals nor their lawyers are ta
ority for me the more I hear.
When the FDA or FTC busts Aspartame, let me know.
JOH
-Original Message-
From: ascottsil...@aol.com [mailto:ascottsil...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:39 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>Re: FTC seizes Seasilver
Dear Mr. Holm
.
Strange
scene; perhaps we will learn more soon.
JOH
-Original Message-
From:
ascottsil...@aol.com [mailto:ascottsil...@aol.com]
Sent:
Thursday,
June 19, 2003 12:30 AM
To:
silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject:
CS>>Re: FTC seizes Seasilver
Dear
Mr. Holmes,
While I appr
My warning letter came from the FTC.
Marshall
jrowl...@nctimes.net wrote:
> Andy writes:
> > In all fairness, the Fed's did give them 14 months to change...
> Wonder what the significance, if any, of the warning letter coming from
> the
> FDA, but the seizure done by the FTC.
> jr
>
> --
> The s
Message-
From: ascottsil...@aol.com [mailto:ascottsil...@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:30 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>>Re: FTC seizes Seasilver
Dear Mr. Holmes,
While I appreciate your sarcasm, I don't understand the point you are trying
to make. Could
Dear Mr. Holmes,
While I appreciate your sarcasm, I don't understand the point you are trying
to make. Could you please elaborate?
Regards,
ADS (the 1st)
From: James Holmes
OHthat's quite different.
JOH
-Original Message-
From:
ascottsil...@aol.com
In all fairness, the Fe
OHthat's quite different.
JOH
-Original Message-
From: ascottsil...@aol.com [mailto:ascottsil...@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:55 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>Re: FTC seizes Seasilver
In all fairness, the Fed's did give them 14 months to
<>
That's the normal protocol.
Catherine
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/he
Andy writes:
> In all fairness, the Fed's did give them 14 months to change...
Wonder what the significance, if any, of the warning letter coming from
the
FDA, but the seizure done by the FTC.
jr
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubsc
In all fairness, the Fed's did give them 14 months to change their labeling
and advertising practices before they came down on them.
Andy
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/wlcfm/full_text.cfm?full_text=SEASILVER&;
Search=Search
6/18/03
"A federal district judge has ordered a Carlsbad company
that sold as much as $1 million per day of a dietary supplement
to recall and relabel or repackage all of the product not yet
in the hands of consumers --- to correct what the
Federal Trade Commission says are false claims that it
6/18/03 update:
"A federal district judge has ordered a Carlsbad company
that sold as much as $1 million per day of a dietary supplement
to recall and relabel or repackage all of the product not yet
in the hands of consumers --- to correct what the
Federal Trade Commission says are false claims
Tonight's local TV news also mentioned "healing cancer" was part of some
salespersons' pitches. Additionally,
> ...While [employee] Brown, who takes the supplement, was stunned at
> the news, she did recall some peculiar behavior from the company
> last week, when they were asked to hand in the
26 matches
Mail list logo
