On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:14:16 -0700 (PDT), silversw...@yahoo.com wrote:
>Do you mean 38 Khz? or 38,000 KHz?
>
>"That is, high energies at
>> these frequencies (we used 38 KC most frequently)
>> will dislodge microscopic
>> particulates."
>
KC = kilocycle = kilohertz = kHz
Regards,
George Martin
This posting suggests to me a needed improvment for next-generation CS
machines: built-in ultrasonic cleaning of the electrodes, container,
and stirring apparatus. (Trem, take note!) If the ultrasonic freqs.
could also serve to replace the stirring aparatus, that would be good,
but as BB seem
which is actually 38,000 Hz. The reason this must be
stated for the record is that a lot of alt medicane is
heading into this area. As I have built a Plasma rife
machine as well, it uses specific freq to treat
specific things which are all Hz and KHz based freq
applications.
--- Brooks Bradle
I meant 38,000 cycles per second. Thirty-eight
KC is force-of-habit...I come from the age of "academic dinosaurs..a
time long before hertz replaced cycles.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
"silversw...@yahoo.com" wrote:
Do you mean 38 Khz? or 38,000 KHz?
"That is, high energies at
> these frequencies (we used 38 KC most frequently)
> will dislodge microscopic
> particulates."
--- Brooks Bradley
wrote:
> Dear Petmc,
> Many years ago I was associated
> with a large
Dear Petmc,
Many years ago I was associated with a large (and
innovative) research and development firm.we conducted extensive design and
operational tests of varying untrasonic designsprincipally for cleaning
objectives. One of the most dist
Interesting; two axes here, freq and strength (as distance per impact?)
Another possible effect is outlined in Science News, Aug 24, p116 where simple
diffusion as exemplified by a 'random walk' model is modified. The
experimenters
'added a so-called "drift term" to the classic equation for
in a field emit
> light.
>
> James-Osbourne: Holmes
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@execonn.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 9:13 AM
> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: CS>Ultrasonic stimulation enhancement
>
> I
AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>Ultrasonic stimulation enhancement
Interesting. Since we know that browning movement is involved in the
aggregation of particles, I would suspect that ultrasonic vibrations would
do
the same thing if sufficiently strong enough. But testing wo
Interesting. Since we know that browning movement is involved in the
aggregation of particles, I would suspect that ultrasonic vibrations would do
the same thing if sufficiently strong enough. But testing would have to be done
to be sure.
Marshall
brpete...@msn.com.au wrote:
> As a user of the
Interesting train of thought.
James-Osbourne: Holmes
-Original Message-
From: brpete...@msn.com.au [mailto:brpete...@msn.com.au]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 6:25 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>Ultrasonic stimulation enhancement
As a user of the pulsed d.c. method of
As a user of the pulsed d.c. method of cs generation,I have recently become
curious as to any beneficial effect of ultrasound frequencies applied to the
colloidal process.
My initial reasoning was related to the effect called cavitation,wherein
microscopic pressure "bubbles" (as utilised in ultraso
12 matches
Mail list logo
