Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-29 Thread Ode Coyote
If no visible light is absorbed, it's reflected as white light. The stronger and more direct the light source, the more the reflected light and the milkier the CS will appear, yet be colorless and not milky under indirect light. Another thing, Colorless CS will also reflect colored light in the

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-28 Thread Ivan Anderson
- Original Message - From: Frank Key fr...@strsoft.com Frank, What colour are particles less than 10 nm? Have you sized a red or yellow sol? Ivan. If anyone is really interested I will take a photo of such a solution and post it on my web site. I routinely make 5 to 10 ppm all

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-28 Thread Frank Key
Bob wrote: Would it be too difficult to build a Zeta portenial measuring device, and where would I find the layout? Yes it would be too difficult. It was easy to build, zeta potential instruments would not cost $30K to buy. frank key -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-28 Thread Frank Key
Ivan wrote: What colour are particles less than 10 nm? The same as in the photo, cloudy, white. Have you sized a red or yellow sol? Have not measured a red, briefly looked at a yellow. I have seen slight yellow with particles over 60-90 nm which is a small fraction of the blue wavelength.

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-27 Thread Frank Key
Roger wrote: Frank: How do you explain the milky appearance for very small particles, or very large ones, for that matter, if, as Marshall says, light from the visible part of the spectrum of not adsorbed in either case? Roger For very small particles, the absorbed light is way below UV

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-27 Thread ROGALTMAN
In a message dated 3/27/01 8:58:29 AM EST, fr...@strsoft.com writes: For very small particles, the absorbed light is way below UV and the complement is also way below UV, so no coloration is apparent. Since a high concentration of particles will absorb light to some extent across the entire

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-27 Thread Frank Key
Roger wrote: Frank: Thanks for your reply. Sorry to so persistent, but could you elaborate more about the physical phenomenon that allows SOME light across the entire visible spectrum to be adsorbed? And it there any difference in appearance between large and small particles when both

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-27 Thread Marshall Dudley
rogalt...@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 3/27/01 0:38:19 AM EST, fr...@strsoft.com writes: The milky appearance also occurs when the concentration of particles is high and the particle size is very small. frank key Frank: How do you explain the milky appearance for very small

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-27 Thread A.V.R.A
I'd be interested in viewing such a photo... Using a salt or saline solution primer also produces a milky white substance... - Original Message - From: Frank Key fr...@strsoft.com To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 6:57 AM Subject: Re: CSTyndall yet clear Roger

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-27 Thread Frank Key
A.V.R.A wrote: I'd be interested in viewing such a photo... Using a salt or saline solution primer also produces a milky white substance... If salt is added, the white particles are silver chloride precipitate. A photo of milky colored cs is at:

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-27 Thread Frank Key
Marshall wrote: Scattering, basically lots of tyndall. Same reason that dilute milk appears milky, scattering off of the minute fat particles. Scattering and absorption are two entirely different and unrelated phenomea. The first has little color (it can apear to give a blue cast due to

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-27 Thread Marshall Dudley
You misread what I said. I said that absorption without any scattering will be clear, but likely colored, and that scattering without absorption will be milky, but with little if any color except for possibly tyndall blue. The examples you give below have both tyndall and scattering, the milky

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-27 Thread Frank Key
Marshall wrote: You misread what I said. I said that absorption without any scattering will be clear, but likely colored, and that scattering without absorption will be milky, but with little if any color except for possibly tyndall blue. The examples you give below have both tyndall

RE: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-27 Thread James Osbourne, Holmes
-Original Message- From: Frank Key [mailto:fr...@strsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:01 AM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CSTyndall yet clear Marshall wrote: You misread what I said. I said that absorption without any scattering will be clear, but likely colored

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-27 Thread Robert L. Berger
Frank; Would it be too difficult to build a Zeta portenial measuring device, and where would I find the layout? Ole Bob -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-26 Thread Marshall Dudley
brpete...@msn.com.au wrote: Petemec, Clear CS with a brigth T.E. (tyndall) most probably says large particles. **wouldn't large particles give my solution a colour(absorption)? CS absorbs though the spectum depending on size. Smallest particles absorb in the

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-26 Thread Marshall Dudley
brpete...@msn.com.au wrote: I suggest you look very closely at the Tyndall beam, Pete, particularly at the consistency of it. The beam should be a solid homogenous band, and should not appear grainy at all. If it does appear grainy then the particles are very large and reflect or diffract

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-26 Thread ROGALTMAN
In a message dated 3/26/01 4:16:32 PM EST, mdud...@execonn.com writes: CS absorbs though the spectum depending on size. Smallest particles absorb in the ultraviolet band, then that is followed by violet, blue, green, yellow, orange, red, and finally infrared.Since you cannot see ultraviolet

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-26 Thread Marshall Dudley
Correct, and in the midrange, what you see is the complement of what is absorbed. However with the bigger particles, although there is no absorption in the visible region, there can be definite scattering, making it look milky if of high enough concentration. Marshall rogalt...@aol.com wrote:

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-26 Thread Frank Key
Marshall wrote: Correct, and in the midrange, what you see is the complement of what is absorbed. However with the bigger particles, although there is no absorption in the visible region, there can be definite scattering, making it look milky if of high enough concentration. The

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-25 Thread Ode Coyote
: Re: CSTyndall yet clear Date: 3/24/01 8:32:47 AM EST From: i...@win.co.nz (Ivan Anderson) Reply-to: silver-list@eskimo.com To:silver-list@eskimo.com Good point. Not as far as I know Roger. This CS (grainy Tyndall) is likely to be unstable. Ivan. Ivan: I have to tell you

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-24 Thread Ivan Anderson
looks clear. I have experienced this in an experimental batch, and was quite surprised. Other than this I can offer no explanation. Ivan. - Original Message - From: brpete...@msn.com.au To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, 24 March 2001 00:12 Subject: CSTyndall yet clear Has

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-24 Thread ROGALTMAN
In a message dated 3/24/01 3:38:27 AM EST, i...@win.co.nz writes: Subj: Re: CSTyndall yet clear Date: 3/24/01 3:38:27 AM EST From: i...@win.co.nz (Ivan Anderson) Reply-to: silver-list@eskimo.com To:silver-list@eskimo.com I suggest you look very closely at the Tyndall beam, Pete

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-24 Thread BRPETERMC
I suggest you look very closely at the Tyndall beam, Pete, particularly at the consistency of it. The beam should be a solid homogenous band, and should not appear grainy at all. If it does appear grainy then the particles are very large and reflect or diffract white light but the solution

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-24 Thread BRPETERMC
Petemec, Clear CS with a brigth T.E. (tyndall) most probably says large particles. **wouldn't large particles give my solution a colour(absorption)? The T.E. can be related to concentration to the first power, and particle size to the third power. **So

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-24 Thread Ivan Anderson
Good point. Not as far as I know Roger. This CS (grainy Tyndall) is likely to be unstable. Ivan. - Original Message - From: rogalt...@aol.com To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, 24 March 2001 21:50 Subject: Re: CSTyndall yet clear In a message dated 3/24/01 3:38:27 AM EST, i

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-24 Thread ROGALTMAN
In a message dated 3/24/01 8:32:47 AM EST, i...@win.co.nz writes: Subj: Re: CSTyndall yet clear Date: 3/24/01 8:32:47 AM EST From: i...@win.co.nz (Ivan Anderson) Reply-to: silver-list@eskimo.com To:silver-list@eskimo.com Good point. Not as far as I know Roger. This CS (grainy

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-24 Thread Ivan Anderson
- Original Message - From: rogalt...@aol.com Ivan: I have to tell you that with my HVAC CS, I can see (and so can 'Ol Bob) sparklers with a laser. Is that what you mean by grainy Tyndall? Roger Imagine a TE composed entirely of sparklies, or as someone once described it, 'a beam of

CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-23 Thread BRPETERMC
Has anyone a decent explanation of how come I get a clear,colourless colloidal silver which although clear{low turbitity},and colourless (not yellow or any other hue) exhibits a lovely bright tyndall effect when my laser is shone through it? Does this correspond to a high concentration of silver

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-23 Thread Ode Coyote
I would say yes I have found no truth to the statement that all LVDC CS is mostly ionic. Some, maybe...but not all. Ken At 11:12 PM 3/23/01 +1100, you wrote: Has anyone a decent explanation of how come I get a clear,colourless colloidal silver which although clear{low turbitity},and

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-23 Thread Marshall Dudley
It simply means that the particles are too small to absorb light in the visible spectrum, and the Tyndall means that you have lots of particles. Sounds like good stuff to me. Marshall brpete...@msn.com.au wrote: Has anyone a decent explanation of how come I get a clear,colourless colloidal

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-23 Thread Robert L. Berger
Petemec, Clear CS with a brigth T.E. (tyndall) most probably says large particles. The T.E. can be related to concentration to the first power, and particle size to the third power. What you do what is COLORLESS not yellow or any other color. My peculiar generator uses multi frequency pulsed

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-23 Thread ROGALTMAN
In a message dated 3/23/01 2:06:03 PM EST, bober...@swbell.net writes: Subj: Re: CSTyndall yet clear Date: 3/23/01 2:06:03 PM EST From: bober...@swbell.net (Robert L. Berger) Reply-to: silver-list@eskimo.com To:silver-list@eskimo.com The T.E. can be related to concentration

Re: CSTyndall yet clear

2001-03-23 Thread Robert L. Berger
Roger; Check the files, I believe that Marshall was the orginator of that piece of data, and its been some time ago. Ole Bob -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: