Hi,
>
> Right now, none of ATtiny11/12/15 or AT90S1200 is listed as a supported
> device in simulavr.
> --
Nice to hear that another feature was dropped...
It's time to start a own private stable version ...
Regards
Klaus
___
Simulavr-devel maili
As Klaus wrote:
> Yes, you can't buy them anymore. But there are maybe some people which
> have some devices "on stack" :-)
They are pretty pointless.
I once had an ATtiny11, I extra "invented" some small (toy)
functionality in order to not throw it away. I wouldn't have
considered using it
Hi Markus,
Am 21.02.2016 um 21:06 schrieb Markus Hitter:
Am 21.02.2016 um 20:48 schrieb Thomas K:
But, we haven't this parts in simulavr! Sure, we can implement this
parts, but if nobody use it? (that's the question!) In the moment I
haven't a problem with that code. It's unused and just dea
Hi Thomas,
be relaxed ... :-) Controller with 3 level stack instead of a real stack
pointer are obsolete.
Yes, you can't buy them anymore. But there are maybe some people which
have some devices "on stack" :-) I also have some at90s1200 and maybe
someday I will use them... maybe also not, I
Am 21.02.2016 um 20:48 schrieb Thomas K:
> But, we haven't this parts in simulavr! Sure, we can implement this
> parts, but if nobody use it? (that's the question!) In the moment I
> haven't a problem with that code. It's unused and just dead code! But
> why maintain this, if not used?
A contradic
On 21.02.2016 20:48, Thomas K wrote:
To answer Albrechts question about who use simulavr: that's the
problem of all - it could be from 5 to thousands ... :-) In normal
distributions simulavr package is available - but in version
0.1.2.6! For debian a package maintainer is wanted. I assume, that
Hi Onno,
I am not sure whether the tiny15 is still in the current code base - is it?
Isn't in code base. :-) How complete is your implementation?
cu, Thomas
___
Simulavr-devel mailing list
Simulavr-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailma
Hi Klaus,
be relaxed ... :-) Controller with 3 level stack instead of a real stack
pointer are obsolete. (as Jörg already wrote) If you look on atmel site
this parts are not listed any more. (even the really small tiny's like
tiny4/5/9/10 have real stack pointer) Of course you can buy tiny11 a
Hi Jörg,
attiny2313 is tricky, the "old" ones initialized the SP to 0 (datasheet
04/06), the attiny2313a (and attiny4313 also) initialized to RAMEND!
(datasheet 11/09)
I've implemented it now for tiny2313 with RAMEND.
cu, Thomas
Am 18.02.2016 um 09:12 schrieb Joerg Wunsch:
As Albrecht Fre
Hey,
Am 21.02.2016 um 15:25 schrieb Albrecht Frenzel:
> How many users of simulavr recently use it (or plan) to simulate
> tiny11/12/15 or at90s1200?
>
> Does anybody know, how many people really use simulavr?
>
I am using simulavr from time to time (maybe every couple months) and I believe
(am
How many users of simulavr recently use it (or plan) to simulate
tiny11/12/15 or at90s1200?
Does anybody know, how many people really use simulavr?
On 21.02.2016 08:18, Klaus wrote:
Hi all,
So the question is: is there a need to implement tiny11/12/15?
(at90s1200 is to old, I think) If n
11 matches
Mail list logo
