--- Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Mahoney wrote:
> > Suppose that the collective memories of all the humans make up only one
> > billionth of your total memory, like one second of memory out of your
> human
> > lifetime. Would it make much difference if it was erased to make
Thanks Ben.
As foundation of my AI friendliness theory I tried to figure out why we
believe what good or bad is and came to the conclusion that humans, animals
and even plants have evolved to perceive as good what is encoded into their
genome/memome having been retained in the course of chance mut
A little light humor courtesy of Zebulon Goertzel, age 14 ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXZw0hwIQWY
;-)
ben
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=582965
>
>
> In other words: if we ever get to a point where the model advocated by
> Stefan Pernar could be implemented, we are at a point where
> implementing CEV is also possible!
This is not necessarily true ... IMO this statement evolves an excessive
confidence regarding the relative capabilities
On 10/27/07, Samantha Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2007, at 1:55 AM, Aleksei Riikonen wrote:
>
>> You seem to have a need to personally give a final answer to "What
>> is 'good'?" -- an answer to what moral rules the universe should be
>> governed by. If you think that your answe
To move the chat in a different direction, here is Stephan Pernar's
articulates self-improving AGI supergoal, drawn from his paper
"Benevolence--
A Materialist Philosophy of Goodness", which is linked to from
http://www.jame5.com/
Definitions:
Suffering = negative subjective experience equiva
Samantha,
I tend to agree with you that CEV is not a currently
directly useful train of thought...
But there is the possibility that -- like many
other not-necessarily-realistic thought experiments --
it stimulates thinking in different
directions that a stricter adherence-to-realism
might now.
On Oct 27, 2007, at 1:55 AM, Aleksei Riikonen wrote:
On 10/27/07, Stefan Pernar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/27/07, Aleksei Riikonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You seem to have a need to personally give a final answer to "What
is
'good'?" -- an answer to what moral rules the universe s
On 10/27/07, Stefan Pernar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/27/07, Aleksei Riikonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You seem to have a need to personally give a final answer to "What is
>> 'good'?" -- an answer to what moral rules the universe should be
>> governed by. If you think that your answ
On 10/27/07, Aleksei Riikonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You seem to have a need to personally give a final answer to "What is
> 'good'?" -- an answer to what moral rules the universe should be
> governed by. If you think that your answer is better than what the
> "surveying" process that CEV i
10 matches
Mail list logo
