On 09/09/2007, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Nathan Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > What if the copy is not exact, but close enough to fool others who
> know
> > > you?
> > > Maybe you won't
observation.
I make no claims for what a super AI will be able to do if it can actually
talk to you.
It's the concept of reconstructing a computer by passive observation that
disagrees
with my mathematical intuition.
--
Nathan Cook
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/e
On 25/06/07, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Nathan Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't wish to retread old arguments, but there are a few theoretical
outs.
> One could be uploaded bit by bit, one neuron at a time if necessary. One
> could be rendere
sci-fi writer put it, Greg Egan I think). Any divergence of vectors that may
take place is a distinct issue of identity.
--
Nathan Cook
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&user_secret=7d7fb4d8
ounds like a falacy of undue amplification...
There are three projects on large scale neuronal emulation, Blue Brain
being just one of them.
What are the other two, out of interest? Blue Brain is using the very
fastest commercial supercomputer, what about the others?
--
Nathan Cook
-
Thi
On 5/21/07, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now there really is no difference between being able to judge the quality of
a
movie (relative to a particular viewer or audience), and being able to
generate high quality movies.
So is it just a lack of ambition that prevents your local
On 9/18/06, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that before we can debate whether AGI will be friendly, there are some
fundamental questions that need to be answered first.
1. If we built an AGI, how would we know if we succeeded?
2. How do we know that AGI does not already exist?
