Yes, that is a problem... won't ring it again...
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Keith
Gearty
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 12:40 PM
To: Tony Graziano
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re
> Are there any special phone settings for a remote polycom
> handset to register appropriately? I say this because I see
> the registration showing the remote public ip address from
> the ISP but not announcing itself as being being NAT. Is this correct?
This indicates that some device is tryi
Are there any special phone settings for a remote polycom handset to register
appropriately? I say this because I see the registration showing the remote
public ip address from the ISP but not announcing itself as being being NAT. Is
this correct?
Tony
__
Thank You
Let me know if you get your SBC working properly
Thank You,
Chris Rawlings
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:25 PM
To: Chris Rawlings
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Cisco phones
Thanks Chris, seems pretty straight forward now that you cleared it up for
me.
Good
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Presence+for+Cisco+79x1+Phones
May want to try this link
I am going to test this out now also
Thank You,
Chris Rawlings
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behal
Polycom Presence / Buddy Watch
I have been trying to setup presence on a polycom ip650 or buddy watch
I have setup the presence feature to be turned on in the phone webconfig
I have setup the speed dial list for that user and check the box Subscribe to
presence
I have checked and made sure tha
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 22:59 +0530, naga raju wrote:
> i have three users 201 ,202,203 all are using xlite soft phones. 201
> called to 203 then after establishing the call 203 put a call on hold
> and continue the conversation from 201 by pressing the *4 (here
> is call parking extension)
>>> On 7/14/2009 at 11:16 AM, in message
>>> <783007f62f80814c877fceff8440729c3c667d2...@kssi-xchange01.keystonesoftware.com>,
>>> Chris Rawlings wrote:>
>
>
>This is a simple setup that I am trying to work out.
>
>Call comes into system and is routed to ext 6...@sip
>
>@sip is s
Hi friends,
today i tried call parking and call pick up in my xlite soft phone it seems
not working.
call parking test:
i have three users 201 ,202,203 all are using xlite soft phones. 201 called
to 203 then after establishing the call 203 put a call on hold and continue
the conversation from 2
I would vote for redundancy in any customer facing application - Voicemail
and Auto Attendant come to mind first. In a failed state, registered phones
can call out, and even get calls when they are set up for DID (I'm assuming
here, don't know for sure), but there needs to be continued call proces
I'm using audiocodes g/w's to the pstn - no pri's - this won't help. Any
other suggestions?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Chris Rawlings [mailto:chris.rawli...@keystonesoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 10:27 AM
To: Gary; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-
Tony Graziano wrote:
> I've always been under the impression you should only call a line in a
> hunt group ONE TIME.
>
> Provisioning a second line on the recptionista phone and ringing THAT
> line might be a better workaround.
I've never had a problem with having a phone mentioned twice on a h
I've always been under the impression you should only call a line in a hunt
group ONE TIME.
Provisioning a second line on the recptionista phone and ringing THAT line
might be a better workaround.
>>> Chris Rawlings 07/14/09 12:18 PM >>>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#
Well this did not work
I was wondering if there was a different approach to getting this to work. It
works if I put the user with a cisco phone just not when I have her with the
polycom phone.
From: Keith Gearty [mailto:keith@
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:31 AM
To: Chris Rawlings
Cc: sipx-u
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 15:38 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
> Of course the other way of looking at it is that SipXecs should be
> operational without the Primary server, but not configurable. In
> other words, maybe you should concentrate on making features like
> voicemail, ACD queues, autoattendants
I have a 4524 with MOH working. The SN has no MOH setting. If the phones have
MOH configured directly they will play the MOH through the SN, parked calls
will play MOH as well.
If you are using sipXbridge and the phones don't have the MOH configured, the
MOH will not play through the SN.
>>> K
> > That one has some very interesting implications... now that we've got
> > the configuration data centralized into sipXconfig properly (a major
> > element of 4.0), it's not as hard as it used to be.
>
> If you want to make sipXconfig HA, you need to use an HA database for
> storing the config d
I can't find a MOH server setting anywhere in the SmartNode web
interface. Does anyone know if MOH is supported on the Patton SmartNodes?
Regards,
Keith.
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.or
Same thing happens when I do it that way also
Thank You,
Chris Rawlings
From: Keith Gearty [mailto:ke...@glensound.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:31 AM
To: Chris Rawlings
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Settings up 2 hunt groups back to back
You don't need
You don't need to use two hunt groups to do this. You can do it with
just one:
First... Ring receptionist, timeout: 6 seconds
If no reply... Ring receptionist
At the same time... Ring other person 1
At the same time... Ring other person 2
At the same time... Ring other pers
For MOH on cisco phones I found that going to your SBC settings and enabling
Music on Hold settings from there works
Goto
Devices -> SBCs -> sipXbridge-1 -> SIP -> Put a Check on Music on Hold
Click OK
Send Profile
Restart Services
Thank You,
Chris Rawlings
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
I have some 7940's and 7962's with the 7915 sidecar attached on a version
4.0.1 server.
I have just about everything working the way I need with a couple exceptions
and I wonder if anyone can tell me if these are even possible for one and
maybe point me in the right direction secondly.
1 -
This is a simple setup that I am trying to work out.
Call comes into system and is routed to ext 6...@sip
6...@sip is setup to be a Hunt group. This hunt group is setup for just 1
phone. That 1 phone rings for 6 seconds. If there is no pickup I have this hunt
group routing to the next hunt gro
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:07 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> That one has some very interesting implications... now that we've got
> the configuration data centralized into sipXconfig properly (a major
> element of 4.0), it's not as hard as it used to be.
If you want to make sipXconfig HA, you need
Of course the other way of looking at it is that SipXecs should be
operational without the Primary server, but not configurable. In other
words, maybe you should concentrate on making features like voicemail,
ACD queues, autoattendants, etc work on the secondary server alone, and
always keep t
Scott Lawrence wrote:
>> Scott Lawrence wrote:
>
>>> I'm interested in opinions on which services that are not currently
>>> redundant that users thing should be. If you could pick just one
>>> service for us to add HA to, what would it be?
>
> On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 14:41 +0100, Keith Gearty wr
Its tricky for sure. SipXconfig on the secondary server could become
active after a timeout of no contact with the primary server. You then
use an rsync based process when they find each other again.
Keith.
Scott Lawrence wrote:
Scott Lawrence wrote:
I'm interested in opinions
Good idea ! Let me try later.
Regards,
Jun
_
From: Keith Gearty [mailto:ke...@glensound.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 10:08 PM
To: jun,wen
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Subscribers Creation in bulk in sipx
I believe there's a CSV import function
3.1.1C
I just tried updating a phone to 3.1.3C. No change.
Scott.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:59 AM
To: Scott Richesson
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.0.1 Upgrade MWI
On Tue,
> Scott Lawrence wrote:
> > I'm interested in opinions on which services that are not currently
> > redundant that users thing should be. If you could pick just one
> > service for us to add HA to, what would it be?
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 14:41 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
> SipXconfig. The abi
I believe there's a CSV import function that may suit your purposes.
Trying creating a new test users then export a CSV file to see what the
exact file format is.
Keith.
jun,wen wrote:
Hi, is there any tools to create subscribers in bulk in sipx ?
Regards
Jun
-
Hi, is there any tools to create subscribers in bulk in sipx ?
Regards
Jun
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 09:32 -0400, Scott Richesson wrote:
> Last night, I was able to upgrade to 4.0.1.
>
> I’ve found 1 problem so far:
>
> I’m using Polycom phones. The MWI doesn’t work. The default MWI
> subscribe (msg.mwi.1.subscribe="116") is set to the extension.
> If I change this
Scott Lawrence wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:05 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
Basically from what I can gather, the intended purpose of HA systems
is load balancing, not true redundancy. It would be nice if it were
designed with both purposes in mind, but it doesn't seem to be.
I wou
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:12:49 +0200, Damian Krzeminski wrote:
> upgrade database from 3.8 to 4.0 without a stop at 3.10
> But DB is really just a small (and the easiest) part of the upgrade. The
> flexibility of DB upgrades is one of the reasons why starting with 4.0
> we are trying to keep entire
Last night, I was able to upgrade to 4.0.1.
I've found 1 problem so far:
I'm using Polycom phones. The MWI doesn't work. The default MWI
subscribe (msg.mwi.1.subscribe="116") is set to the extension. If
I change this to the full SIP Url, the MWI works fine.
So, I guess two questions:
1
> is there a wish list for SipXecs project where people can “wish”
> features or vote for them?
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 00:14 -0700, Todd Hodgen wrote:
> You can vote on enhancements in the SipXecs Project page under
> “Popular Issues”
>
>
>
> http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX?report=com
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:05 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
> Basically from what I can gather, the intended purpose of HA systems
> is load balancing, not true redundancy. It would be nice if it were
> designed with both purposes in mind, but it doesn't seem to be.
I wouldn't say that... our strateg
Basically from what I can gather, the intended purpose of HA systems is
load balancing, not true redundancy. It would be nice if it were
designed with both purposes in mind, but it doesn't seem to be. In my
system I've implemented a simplistic redundancy by cloning the SipXecs
server and leav
You can vote on enhancements in the SipXecs Project page under "Popular
Issues"
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.syste
m.project:popularissues-panel
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behal
Tony Graziano wrote:
> I don't think so. I think 3.10 would be a first step and then 4.0x. The
> database between 3.8 and 3.10 was different and the same with 4.01.
> There is no schema upgrade for 4.0x that I know of that will do that
> directly without stepping through 3.10, though I may be wrong
Hi all,
is there a wish list for SipXecs project where people can "wish" features or
vote for them?
Thank you,
Heros
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscr
42 matches
Mail list logo
