On 10/17/2009 09:03 AM, William Otten wrote:
> OK guys
> My SipXecs experience:
> When it comes down to it, if you are a home user, what's best Sipx or
> Trixbox? You have to ask yourself, what's most important? IM with video
> or voice mail attachments if you have a pubic ip address? Also what
>
OK guys
My SipXecs experience:
When it comes down to it, if you are a home user, what's best Sipx or
Trixbox? You have to ask yourself, what's most important? IM with video
or voice mail attachments if you have a pubic ip address? Also what
about the ease of installation and use. I choose Trixb
Not. Godaddy.com will register a domain for $9 a year, and you can set up a
SRV record on it.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of William Otten
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 9:00 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subjec
My understanding is that to use srv records you need a dedicated server
not a shared server that most web hosting companies provide. Which is
expensive for the home user, one web hosting company quoted a price of
$99 / month.
William Otten wrote:
Alan
I'm a novice so how can what you have exp
Alan
I'm a novice so how can what you have expressed help? Please be more
specific.
Thanks
Alan McKay wrote:
Here in Ontario, Canada, there are DSL ISPs who will give you a static
IP for only 5 bucks a month on top of your regular DSL service. With
mind I have a whole subnet for only 10 bucks
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Picher, Michael
wrote:
> Seems good. Typical Patton. Size was nice and small!
>
>
Agreed. Kinda fun when it "tells" you it's IP too. I'm trying to convince
Patton to make a POE version...imagine the possibilities.
___
> Here in Ontario, Canada, there are DSL ISPs who will give you a static
> IP for only 5 bucks a month on top of your regular DSL service. With
> mind I have a whole subnet for only 10 bucks a month.
p.s. I also run my own DNS servers, but that is also pretty easy
--
“Don't eat anything you've
> ...how can someone implement a home system at a reasonable cost and
> still accommodate the srv record issue?
Where are you located and what are your ISP options?
Here in Ontario, Canada, there are DSL ISPs who will give you a static
IP for only 5 bucks a month on top of your regular DSL servic
Hey guys
I have been trying to resolve this can not connect issue concerning the
smtp (voicemail attachment or more). My understanding so far is it could
be a srv issue with a cheap web hosting provider. I have researched
several possible web hosts (10 candidates so far) in the area of $4 to
$6
Hi,
I am trying to setup a remote worker in lab environment. Can we use LAN as an
option to test the remote worker?
__ __
___
| Router|_| LAN |
Mike wrote:
> If that's true, how will we deal with a mixed environment of phones?
Legacy phones will simply not download 3.2.X firmware. This is Polycom
BootROM behaviour.
On the sipXecs side, the config files generated for these models are
compliant with Polycom 3.1.3RevC. (The latest 3.1.X.)
If that's true, how will we deal with a mixed environment of phones?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Mossman
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:05 PM
To: Josh Patten; sipx-users@list.sipfo
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 15:21 -0400, William Otten wrote:
> I was wondering if I can host my public ip address, domain name, on the
> sipx computer? Is it too involved for the novice? What would it take to
> make this happen? Pro's and con's. Please advise
Right now it's possible _if_ you are very
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 15:21 -0400, William Otten wrote:
> I was wondering if I can host my public ip address, domain name, on the
> sipx computer? Is it too involved for the novice? What would it take to
> make this happen? Pro's and con's. Please advise.
I would say that it is not inherently di
I was wondering if I can host my public ip address, domain name, on the
sipx computer? Is it too involved for the novice? What would it take to
make this happen? Pro's and con's. Please advise.
Thanks
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfound
Josh wrote:
> It appears Polycom Firmware 3.2.1 is now available to the
> general public. Are there currently plans to get sipXconfig
> outfitted with the newest config options in sipX 4.2 or will
> that have to wait until a later release?
Done. (I'm hoping to ultimately support Polycom 3.2
venerdì 16 ottobre 2009 - Scott Lawrence scrive:
|> Yes:
|>http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Configuring_remote_wor
|>kers_cheatsheet
|>
|> ... there is (correctly) no mention of an SBC on that page.
Sorry, now I realize.
--
Claudio Succa
PERTEL - Torino - Italy
+39-011-437.4141
http:/
I will implement this some time next week. Also, if this patch causes
things to go haywire, will force-upgrading the original 4.0.2 sipxbridge
RPM restore the original binaries that this patch replaces?
sipx-users-requ...@list.sipfoundry.org wrote:
> -
It appears Polycom Firmware 3.2.1 is now available to the general
public. Are there currently plans to get sipXconfig outfitted with the
newest config options in sipX 4.2 or will that have to wait until a
later release? It appears that Polycom has implemented fixes to some
enhanced BLF issues I
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:03 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Derek Bartolo <
> dbart...@comsourcetechnologies.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey guys I noticed something odd the last couple of days. I’m running
>> sipx 4.0.1 with 2 polycom desksets setup. I’m using Unlimitel as
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Derek Bartolo <
dbart...@comsourcetechnologies.com> wrote:
> Hey guys I noticed something odd the last couple of days. I’m running
> sipx 4.0.1 with 2 polycom desksets setup. I’m using Unlimitel as our sip
> trunk service. So basically what happens is the system w
Thanks for your answers.
The source of the problem was eventually some obscure IP-stack problem
on the secondary machine. Even though the machine seemed to operate
correctly, it rejected incoming SIP packets therefore the clients felt
that the failover was not successful. Restarting the machine so
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 14:32 +0100, Gabor Paller wrote:
> This may be handy for somebody else so I continue on the list. Shoot me
> down if you feel it is too Cisco-specific.
>
> I don't even know what CUBE is. :-)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5640/index.html
[...]
> I hope
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 15:49 +0200, Claudio Succa wrote:
> giovedì 15 ottobre 2009 - Scott Lawrence scrive:
> |> [please keep discussions on the list]
>
> Sorry, I didn't see that your message was not self addressed to the list.
>
> |> You don't need an SBC at all for that - just configure the
giovedì 15 ottobre 2009 - Scott Lawrence scrive:
|> [please keep discussions on the list]
Sorry, I didn't see that your message was not self addressed to the list.
|> You don't need an SBC at all for that - just configure the firewall as
|> the default IP router.
I am confused: don't I hav
This may be handy for somebody else so I continue on the list. Shoot me
down if you feel it is too Cisco-specific.
I don't even know what CUBE is. :-) The setting that works for our Cisco
ISDN gateways is a dial peer that redirects numbers in the SipX user
number range back to the SipX. Otherwise
Not to turn this into a Cisco design discussion, but can you send me a link
to configuring Cisco CUBE's to support REFER messages? The only thing I've
seen so far, is a reference to TCL IVR scripts that are referenced from the
dial-peer. That seems like massive overkill for a simple problem.
Any
Hey guys I noticed something odd the last couple of days. I'm running
sipx 4.0.1 with 2 polycom desksets setup. I'm using Unlimitel as our sip
trunk service. So basically what happens is the system will dial in and
dial out but after half an hour to 2 hours the system won't dial out
anymore. So I w
Hello everyone,
3 days ago the job opportunity below has been posted in the SIPFoundry Linkedin
group by the user http://www.linkedin.com/in/stephentchristensen
The user allowed me to post it here in the list.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Seems good. Typical Patton. Size was nice and small!
-Original Message-
From: Keith Gearty [mailto:ke...@glensound.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 5:51 AM
To: Picher, Michael
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Patton M-ATA-1/E Micro Analogue Telephone
Ada
Picher, Michael wrote:
>We've tried them with a Mitel 3300 pbx but not with sipXecs... They are
>simple to setup.
>
What was your opinion of their quality, etc?
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoun
We've tried them with a Mitel 3300 pbx but not with sipXecs... They are
simple to setup.
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Keith
Gearty
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 5:45 AM
Cc: sipx-users@list.sip
Keith Gearty wrote:
>Has anybody tried the Patton M-ATA-1/E with SipXecs? (It's basically a
>miniture 1 x FXS gateway). We're looking at using it together with our
>analog DECT phones as an inexpensive replacement for the Snom m3, which
>was universally disliked.
>
>Does anyone know how well
Has anybody tried the Patton M-ATA-1/E with SipXecs? (It's basically a
miniture 1 x FXS gateway). We're looking at using it together with our
analog DECT phones as an inexpensive replacement for the Snom m3, which
was universally disliked.
Does anyone know how well its consultative call trans
" Also, to call the Cisco device "deficient" seems harsh to me."
Cisco IOS handles REFERs starting from 12.3 (as far as I was able to dig
out). I have very good experiences with Cisco gateways handling REFERs.
If, however, REFER is really impossible, you can pull the call through
sipxbridge that
35 matches
Mail list logo
