On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 13:07 +0600, Александр Горбунов wrote:
> Upps! I'm sorry! Here is my dream.
This is more up to date:
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuserV4r0/SIP+Trunking
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archi
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 14:42 -0600, Austin Curry wrote:
>
> It was a basic setting that I overlooked.
>
> Note: NTP is not used on this server.
Why not?
Getting the time right and keeping it right is pretty simple, and makes
many things work better.
Computers have _terrible_ clocks - they _wi
On 3/3/2010 1:51 PM, Raymond Dans wrote:
>
> The changes in 4.2 to the CDR records are mostly related to new fields
> being added. There are some other types of changes to existing fields
> (termination) but they're pretty minor and shouldn't impact you.
>
> For your sql query regarding the dates,
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Robert Joly wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:16 PM
> > To: Joly, Robert AVAYA (CAR:9D30)
> > Cc: Sipx-dev list; Sipx-users list
> > Subject: Re: [sipX-dev]
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:16 PM
> To: Joly, Robert AVAYA (CAR:9D30)
> Cc: Sipx-dev list; Sipx-users list
> Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] sipxbridge and remote users without
> server behind nat
>
>
>
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Robert Joly wrote:
> > Does sipxbridge have to be behind nat in order for remote
> > users or trunking to work?
>
> Yes as long as you uncheck the 'Server behind NAT' checkbox under
> System->Internet Calling->NAT Traversal. BTW, just to make sure,
> sipXbridge an
> Does sipxbridge have to be behind nat in order for remote
> users or trunking to work?
Yes as long as you uncheck the 'Server behind NAT' checkbox under
System->Internet Calling->NAT Traversal. BTW, just to make sure,
sipXbridge and remote NAT traversal are two different beasts - please
see qu
In case anyone runs into this, the fix in this case was that the time
and date on the Sipxecs server had reset and made the certificate
invalid.
The error that I received when starting sipxecs is the same as this:
http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-commit/msg11818.html
Setting the date an
Does sipxbridge have to be behind nat in order for remote users or trunking
to work? For trunking I can get inbound calls and make calls, whether or not
I use public address for call setup, but have consistent audio issues.
I've been trialling a standby system that I could use at a central locatio
Matthew wrote:
>Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Specific CDR query with emailed results
>
>Do you know if this particular area is even remotely similar?
>The only challenging part for me will be adding the date
>constraints to the queries.
>This is a simple query I'm using to get part of the data for
>
Do you know if this particular area is even remotely similar?
The only challenging part for me will be adding the date constraints to
the queries.
This is a simple query I'm using to get part of the data for one extension.
select * from cdrs where callee_aor is ;
It will obviously get a little mor
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:00 PM, wrote:
>
> http://uc500.com/en/more-ridiculousness-bandwidthcom
>
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sip
http://uc500.com/en/more-ridiculousness-bandwidthcom___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX
Quick update for those who might consider using Patton Smartlink M-ATA,
one-port FXS device.
Summary of the problem: M-ATA device ignores TCP INVITEs from sipx proxy if
they are bigger than 1400 (or so) bytes.
Summary of tests: When making calls from another M-ATA or X-lite to the M-ATA,
via
I would develop this against the new sipX as the database for 4.2 is
changing drastically (for the better)
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 3/3/2010 11:49 AM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote:
> I'm about to write a CDR script to send wee
I'm about to write a CDR script to send weekly logs for specified users
to their managers. I found the table where it is stored and it looks
pretty straight forward. I'm no sql expert, so I wanted to make sure I'm
not reinventing the wheel. Has anyone done something similar they would
like to s
AudioCodes MP112 for just two port FXS.
I prefer the MP114 as it will give you two FXS and two FXO for a small
implementation and can be used as a backup analog gateway if your
primary goes down.
Austin Curry
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@
I am also confused. Did you say you want a PCI card? not possible with
sipX. You can try to implement that on a separate system but I wouldnt
waste the time.
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 3/3/2010 11:01 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Ether
Not sure I follow the question or statement...
I prefer patton gateways. They can do so much more than the typical gateway.
Not sure about the offhook dialing but I used to use the cisco 186/188 and
they worked fine with polycom analog conference squid phones.
Tony Gr
Ethernet or pci card (using CENTOS5 CD). would need 4.04 and 4.2 support.
Have two legacy POTS phones (one a older polycom analog 'bat' phone, one
a security phone). security phone is programmed to dial a 4 digit
extension already, but lobby phone type support would work also. (and
the secur
The outside world IMAP server is SSL only (not TLS) is that going to be
a problem?
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 3/3/2010 8:32 AM, Peter Fowler wrote:
1) use case that is failing
2) IMAP server used (eg. Exchange, Courier, Dovecot..).
Going to test this morning, what info do you need me to gather for you
when I test?
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 3/3/2010 8:15 AM, Peter Fowler wrote:
Yes .. that's why I am interested in the failure that Josh is seeing
since he has the
actually i gave you access to an email account. you committed a fix a week
ago. i just cant update the rpm.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Peter Fowler wrote:
> Can you provide details on the issue:
> 1) use case that is failing
> 2) IMAP server used (eg. Exchange, Courier, Dovecot..).
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
