False alarm maybe. It looks like I may have picked 5 users that only
listen to them as email attachments.
On 7/17/2010 10:46 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote:
> This restore finished. Same issue though. All message unheard. It does
> correctly update the status when I listen to one.
> O
This restore finished. Same issue though. All message unheard. It does
correctly update the status when I listen to one.
On 7/17/2010 10:39 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote:
> The portal agrees. They are bold with an unopened envelope. I't trying
> to restore just voicemail to see if th
The portal agrees. They are bold with an unopened envelope. I't trying
to restore just voicemail to see if that does anything at all.
On 7/17/2010 10:28 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Matthew Kitchin
Thanks for all the detailed instructions.
Just wanted to let everybody know about the issues I encountered and how I
was able to work around it.
. This was a clean 4.2.0-018575 install from ISO
. Changing the sipxecs.repo file to include the new base url for
[sipxecs-stable] res
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
> wrote:
>> When I check a few voicemail boxes now, it saying they have X number of
>> unheard messages. This seems to be the case on all I check. Is this
>> expected? I dou
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
wrote:
> When I check a few voicemail boxes now, it saying they have X number of
> unheard messages. This seems to be the case on all I check. Is this
> expected? I doubt they all really had that meany unheard messaged. It
> isn't s
I had to restore a 4.0.4 server today. I don't want to talk about it...
Looks like it was my own fault.
Anyway, the restore never seemed to finish according to the web
interface. It never redirected to the login screen, and I couldn't
access the interface if I pulled it up manually. I got a secu
Man.. .What an awful day.
After more headaches than I care to describe, I'm guessing the 'issue' I
describe below is the same on 4.0.4 and I just never noticed.
I have been through restore hell, I'm still stuck in SSL hell, and now
I'm guessing there was never a problem in the first place, and I
I'm a patton noob - I'll look around for that functionality...
- Original Message -
From: Tony Graziano
To: Nathaniel Watkins; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Sent: Sat Jul 17 19:18:42 2010
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] let's strip (a digit that is...)
I would strip it at the patton and lea
I would strip it at the patton and leave sipx alone.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427
Helpdesk Contract
Hoping this is an easy question - I am connecting an older PBX with Sipx via a
Patton PRI gateway. I'm pretty sure the call from the older PBX will come with
a '6' in front of the 4 digit extension that needs to go to sipXecs (or whatver
it's called...)
What is the best way to get rid of the '
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 1:15 PM, dan wrote:
> Could someone clarify the difference between the repos at
> opensuse.org and ezuce.com? The builds at opensuse seem to be slightly
> newer. Which one is recommended?
ezuce.com are the official ones. Occasionally I'll have opensuse
buildservice build
I'd use http://download.ezuce.com/sipfoundry and choose the stable ones.
Newer is not always better.
--martin
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of dan
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 1:16 PM
To: sipx-use
Could someone clarify the difference between the repos at
opensuse.org and ezuce.com? The builds at opensuse seem to be slightly
newer. Which one is recommended?
Thanks.
--
Dan McDaniel
d...@dm3.us
Key fingerprint = CAEC B8D9 3701 86CF D3B2 1E99 D8BB F217 455C AD36
___
The scriptlet always fails. I manually uninstall the old ftp rpm because
they both show installed. I already opened a JIRA.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems
Thanks. CDR data looks good on all my test machine, so it looks like
that data should be fine.
On 7/17/2010 10:34 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
WAIT...
You might want to make a manual backup of your CDR data. When I did an
upgrade from 3.10.3 to 4.0.4 all CRD data went bye bye. I haven't been
cur
Finally found it.
I've been looking for ntpd all along because I had removed my ntpdate script
which was using ntpdate.
I had a second script sitting in /etc/cron.hourly and never looked there. Since
I wasn't looking for ntpdate, nothing ever came up.
I was using grep for example, searching sp
WAIT...
You might want to make a manual backup of your CDR data. When I did an
upgrade from 3.10.3 to 4.0.4 all CRD data went bye bye. I haven't been
curious enough yet to see if 4.0.4 to 4.2.1 does the same thing, but I
suspect it does.
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Matthew Kitchin (Public)
Thanks. I will do that. Maybe stopping it will allow that ftp scriptlet to
succeed. I think I will go through with the upgrade today or tomorrow.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Picher
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:07:00
To: Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
Cc:
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Up
Matthew,
The only thing additional that I do is 'service sipxecs stop' before I do
the 'yum update sipxecs'.
And then when the PBX comes back up, send server profile, and then send all
phone profiles.
Mike
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) <
mkitchin.pub...@gmail.
Regardless, it should work.
An attended transfer is really helpful in some environments where the
transferor needs to talk to the transferee, but the media server should
ALLOW it even if it does not make sense because it breaks the call. What
good is it if someone can start hanging up on callers b
because that was what was asked? try it, document it, comment on the
bug and vote on it?
I suppose we could just train everyone to push that extra 'more' button
and hit blind transfer.
In fact, an attended transfer to AA or VM doesn't make all that much
sense anyway.
On 7/16/10 7:31 PM, To
22 matches
Mail list logo
