On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> So we just need to identify the actual fix and separate it from the
> work that was done on unstable branch.
spot was identified, fixed, built and uploaded to 4.2.1 build
however to enable the fix you have to follow the instructions in
Hi All
I have been trying to get sipx working for some time. Seems I don't know
much about dns like I should. Have been using the internal dns server
with some success.
Aastra 57i phones have been what I like to use but can't seem to do
manual setup, don't want sipx only on the phones.
On inte
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Tran, Ly V. wrote:
> I can't seem to get this update through the GUI or via yum. The PBX was
> originally 4.04 and upgraded to 4.2. I remember having to edit the
> sipxecs.repo file to get the upgrade completed. Anyhow, getting this
> error message:
>
> Downloadi
Hi Sen,
I'd be more than happy to send you a SPA500 series phone with a sidecar...
Do you feel that you can resolve the BLF thing with the Cisco/Linksys
phone? If so, what kind of time frame would be looking at.. ?
2010/7/29 Sen Heng
> Thanks Tony! I am still here work with Sipx and guys J
>
I can't seem to get this update through the GUI or via yum. The PBX was
originally 4.04 and upgraded to 4.2. I remember having to edit the
sipxecs.repo file to get the upgrade completed. Anyhow, getting this
error message:
Downloading and installing updated packages...
Loaded plugins: downloado
Thanks for the suggestion Michael, but no change.
Sven
From: Michael Picher [mailto:mpic...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 July 2010 18:30
To: Sven Evensen
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipxproxy adds 1.5 second to outgoing INVITE
w
BTW if you want to see this improvement you should go vote for the
issue. Click the checkbox next to votes
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 7/29/2010 3:51 PM, Abdul Mayat wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transf
There isn't currently a workaround that I know of
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 7/29/2010 3:51 PM, Abdul Mayat wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Organization: SipXecs Forum
> In-Reply
>
>
> MWI is very close working with DNS. If you have DNS setup correct ,
> MWI should be ok.
>
got it now:
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8422
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8376
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8238
> Proxy field can take either IP or DNS , but it recommend
>
>
> MWI is very close working with DNS. If you have DNS setup correct ,
> MWI should be ok.
>
> Proxy field can take either IP or DNS , but it recommend to use dns.
>
but, the GUI won't take dns. even though its the default.
>
> I can’t remember how many characters “diaplay” field can take. Could
I see nothing wrong with either invite, except the fact that there is a
cancel between sipxbridge and the provider on the failed call.
Time: 2010-07-29T05:33:09.656000Z
Frame: 27 /tmp/trace.aWD29XQ8/_.sipxbridge.trace.xml:68
Source: pfcpbx01-sipXbridge
Dest: 67.158.102.9:5060
CANCEL sip:17179191.
MWI is very close working with DNS. If you have DNS setup correct , MWI
should be ok.
Proxy field can take either IP or DNS , but it recommend to use dns.
I can’t remember how many characters “diaplay” field can take. Could you
give better explain ?
Thanks,
Sen
CCIE Security # 20852
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: <4c51d5d6.7010...@co.brazos.tx.us>
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <49712>
Message-ID:
Hi Josh,
Did you have an interim solution to get around this, or did
you go
>
>
> Thanks Tony! I am still here work with Sipx and guys J
>
> It seems BLF is the last thing for Cisco and Linksys phone now.
>
and allowing a domain name in the proxy field? (its the domain by
default, but will only take ip addresses in the GUI)?
expanding the 'display' line so you can actually
I am all for listening to people who know a lot about sipx, and who
might have knowledge of this type of setup in theory, but I am really
looking for people who have successfully done this to chime in.
Question #1: HA only, mostly for fail over, voicemail and redirection to
cell phones and alt
I have seen posts that show problems with early media (I don't think
sipx supports it), and am going to work with Level3 to turn it off and
do some tests..
HOWEVER, it APPEARS, that early media seems to solve the 'dead air when
transferring externally' issue.
ie: external caller calls the AA
We would like to create a list of users of sipXecs. If you'd like to be on
it, send me a ping. Do it off list as to not swamp the mailing list. This
would be terrific help.
--martin
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List
I have some Polycom IP335s that have loaded the Polycom Productivity
Suite license successfully.
Is there a place in SipXecs SipXconfig where RTCP-XR packet generation
on Polycom phones can be enabled? I haven't found one.
If not is there a preferred process to toggle the appropriate attrib
Martin,
Sure, will help with this.
I found one phone called ATCOM AT610P, its about 30 Euro each. I am going to
test all the functions manually before I integrate in.
Thanks,
Sen
From: Martin Steinmann [mailto:mstei...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2010年7月30日 2:35
To: he...@tcd.ie; 'Tony Grazi
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8637
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 7/29/2010 12:05 PM, Martin Steinmann wrote:
> An issue in Jira would be good. Improved prompt management, including the
> ability to turn it off has been asked for befo
Sen
There are some nice phones for which the current support is not where it
should be. That includes Aastra and Snom (800 series and M series), but
also the Polycom Kirk DECT phone (600 series) would be terrific. I know
they are not exactly cheap, but we might be able to help there.
--mart
Thanks Tony! I am still here work with Sipx and guys J
It seems BLF is the last thing for Cisco and Linksys phone now.
If someone want to integrate another brand of phone, I like to help.
What I am looking for is a cheap and also competitive(can fulfill all the
functions) phone……
what if you move that particular dial plan entry up in the dial plan?
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Sven Evensen wrote:
> I have noticed that an outgoing INVITE is “stuck” in sipxProxy for 1.5
> seconds before it is sent out.
>
> This is if the destination is soft phone or a SIP trunk not
On 7/29/10 12:42 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> my bad. I changed my email address.
> so, I tried changing it on lists. it never sent me the confirmation email.
>
>
thanks.
> so, I unsub'd, and tried to subscribe. it never send me the
> confirmation email.
>
> I am looking at raw mail logs n
Josh, Thank you so much for the reply... we appreciate the constructive
information.. Based on what you're advising.. we'll punt and move over to
freeswitch or asterisk...We've done quite a bit with asterisk, but made
the move to sipXecs because it provided answers to some challenges that
An issue in Jira would be good. Improved prompt management, including the
ability to turn it off has been asked for before.
--martin
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Abdul Mayat
Sent: Thursday, Jul
Not sure why I typed ATA... please forgive the typo.
We currently have a number of these phones.. that work quite well with
sipXecs, with the exception of the blf functionality... The challenge
we're experiencing is solely with BLF... & only recently have we the need
for blf. It appears Je
my bad. I changed my email address.
so, I tried changing it on lists. it never sent me the confirmation email.
so, I unsub'd, and tried to subscribe. it never send me the
confirmation email.
I am looking at raw mail logs now, and don't see anything even trying to
be sent (eg: Im not blocking
Right. Sen heng is the volunteer maintainer of cisco plugins (by himself I
think).
So it will show up as an option when it is pulled into 4.3...
Thanks Sen and Doug!
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Tony Graziano
> wrote:
> > Noone has
If someone can manually make Cisco/Linksys BLF working, please give me a
shout.
But I think I have put all the config field onto GUI...
Thanks,
Sen
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Positively
Optimistic
Sent: Thursda
The way BLF works with sipX is that the RLS engine (the engine that
provides BLF information to the phones in either Broadsoft style or
RFC-4662 style format to the phones) can only propagate accurate
information if it receives accurate presence information from the phones
(if someone could poi
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> Noone has stepped up to maintain such a plugin for this model, which is why
> you don't find it in the sipxconfig menu as a supported device (no matter
> how similar to other Cisco/Linksys products it might be).
>
> I have only seen a few mes
You're mixing terminology. That is a confusing statement.
ATA is a terminal adapter for an analog phone.
Cisco SPA500 series is an actual SIP handset (not an adapter).
You will find that the configuration file, parameters, and capabilities for
ATA's and Handsets are VERY different, even for the
>From what I'm gathering here... sipXecs doesn't support BLF on the
Cisco/Linksys line of ATA phones? Please forgive my ignorance.. but when
you refer to "plugin" is that for the sipX generated configurations? ...or
is that regarding support within the presence server? I noticed that Mr.
S
I think you have to look at the logic behind what is supported. Products
that weren't strategic to a Pingtel or Avaya sales and marketing effort
didn't have a lot of chance of being put into the product by them. So,
unless someone provides a solution that they have developed and put into the
proj
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: <4c4849bf.5030...@co.brazos.tx.us>
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <49686>
Message-ID:
Josh/Martin,
Did this issues ever get raised into a new JIRA?
I would like
For what it is worth, these steps work perfectly for me for installing
a cert and CA cert on a 4.0.4 machine (thanks Grant!)
Build the SipXecs machine so it is complete and a standard build, all
configured and rebooted a couple of times.
SSH onto the box and run the following:
mkdir $HOME/s
I don't think it's valid because it's not something the phone can
agree to. don't take my word for it though. Who is the provider?
I don't see how the phone can agree unless it says, yeah I can do u-law.
On Thursday, July 29, 2010, Matt White wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Struggling with a sip tru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2010 11:29 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Can you specify what type of very you uploaded? (ie. 1024, 2048, etc.).
Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption
Public-Key: (1024 bit)
joe
>
> On Thursday, July 29, 2010, Joe Micciche wrote:
> On 07/28/20
Can you specify what type of very you uploaded? (ie. 1024, 2048, etc.).
On Thursday, July 29, 2010, Joe Micciche wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/28/2010 04:16 PM, Martin Steinmann wrote:
>> There were two earlier issues like this:
>> http://track.sipfoundry.org/
Struggling with a sip trunk provider where polycom cancels after the 183
message. The only thing different I see between this and other providers is
the SDP feilds.
This provider sends the codec in the media description but I do not see a
corresponding Media attribute for the codec. Is that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2010 04:16 PM, Martin Steinmann wrote:
> There were two earlier issues like this:
> http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7349
> http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7249
>
> What version are you running? Looking at the sipxconfig.log would
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
> Is it on the roadmap to be able to integrate sipX-openfire with an LDAP
> or Active Directory any time soon?
Yes there is a bunch of things that is mostly in 4.3.0 already that my
team is having an internal demo on tomorrow. We've testing w/
Is it on the roadmap to be able to integrate sipX-openfire with an LDAP
or Active Directory any time soon?
--
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
> Does Patton make an 8 port FXO gateway? There seems to be nothing
> between 4 and 12 ports for FXO with Patton. If this is the case it will
> be difficult to justify replacing the current Audiocodes MP-118-FXO
> gateway that likes to drop calls
That's the same thing I've come across. We're having to get 3 of the
SmartNode 4114s since we have 9 lines that we need to connect. It works out
in our situation, though, since we have three separate groupings of three
numbers, so each 4114 will handle three lines.
--
Jeremy Fluhmann
*Technolo
I couldn't find one. That is why I went audiocoes at my corporate office. We
needed exactly 8 lines on our fail over device. Given some of the features I
was using, spreading that across 2 devices was beyond my skill set.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Patten
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@l
Not that I am aware of. They make some super dense FXS devices, but FXO is
limited to max of 4 ports on a single device.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
> Does Patton make an 8 port FXO gateway? There seems to be nothing
> between 4 and 12 ports for FXO with Patton. If this is
Does Patton make an 8 port FXO gateway? There seems to be nothing
between 4 and 12 ports for FXO with Patton. If this is the case it will
be difficult to justify replacing the current Audiocodes MP-118-FXO
gateway that likes to drop calls if it doesn't detect the voice of the
other speaker (bel
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: <727be0f3c9c01540a9581438f89b84ae0d681...@amskc05.asii.local>
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <49675>
Message-ID:
All,
I managed to get to the bottom of this in th
Noone has stepped up to maintain such a plugin for this model, which is why
you don't find it in the sipxconfig menu as a supported device (no matter
how similar to other Cisco/Linksys products it might be).
I have only seen a few messages regarding this model. Perhaps it would be a
good idea to c
Has anyone successfully implemented BLF with this phone? It is hard to
imagine that this doesn't work in consideration of the sheer number of these
phones that have been or are being deployed
We've recently purchased 50 for use with sipXecs
Thanks,
Jenni
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:47 AM
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Danny Shay
[ds...@norlemtc.com]
The majority of phones at this site are flashing red/yellow BLF lights. ALL
the lights that are set up as speed dial / BLF
53 matches
Mail list logo
