I understand your point, Russ, but, also please remember that this is a
users list, not a developers list. If you must, look at it as a
feedback repository of the shortcomings or challenges of usage of the
product to the common user and admin and, quick solutions to solve those
problems.
One
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
wrote:
> With Sipx, Verizon sip trunk, and Polycom 450/550s, we have been parking
> the call on 41, 42, 43, etc, then paging "Bob you have a call on *41"
> This has not always gone over well. They get used to it, but prefer
> their
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Henry Dogger wrote:
> I also tried to see what’s wrong with sipxproc. Are services are disabled,
> when I try to start one it’s get the state: “ConfigurationMismatch”
>
> When I get the statusmessage is contains: ["version.mismatch: software
> '0.0.4.5.1' != confi
If you're using Polycom phones what you could possibly do is set up an EFK for
each site as documented here:
http://sites.google.com/site/sipxecstipsandtricks/polycom-phones and have them
press a "PickUp" EFK button and enter the "park slot" and have the polycom EFK
function tack on the *4 in t
As I slowly replace old systems at remote locations, I have to mirror
their current setup. Even if I don't like it, that is what I have to do.
Several of the sites have a single person answer all calls, put the call
on hold, and then page "Bob, call on line 1".
With Sipx, Verizon sip trunk, and P
>>> David Sharafy 12/10/10 2:51 PM >>>
>>and are you using it for remote users?
We recently did a deployment with about 50 remote yealink phones. They work
well and the price is nice...the TP26 and above have a builtin openvpn client
too.
But they have to be configured by hand and have issue
Yes and No. Only myself and one other person have 560's remotely. Softphones
are a cheaper route, and since both use the same connection, in my opinion a
better option overall.
Check around tho...you can get IP 560's for under $200 in quite a few
places...just gotta look for them. We got al
335, 450 (2 and 3 line respectively). If the user does not have POE remember
to get a power cord if it does not come with one.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Syste
any specific Polycom model? 560 is pricy for remote users... Thanks All
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Watkins
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 3:21 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject:
Polycom all the way - I have a nice snom phone - but I leave it locked in a
metal cabinet...in my opinion, the Polycom phone are much easier to work with.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Josh M. Patten
Sent: Friday, Decem
Domenico,
that sounds really interesting!
I know that there are some settings that still require a reboot of the phone
when they are changed. Does your patch handle that?
How do the phones behave when changing such a setting and sending profile
without rebooting?
Regards
René
2010/12/10 Domenic
Polycom is always my first choice. I stick with the HD capable models because
they just sound so much better :)
I've heard Snom has a decent lineup as well.
I've tried Grandstream phones with sipX and they have a lot of issues,
especially with BLF. They also have strange REFER issues.
From: si
Polycoms are good remote phones. Be aware the firewall at the remote end
should have spi off and sip alg disabled.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
and are you using it for remote users?
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Victor Williams
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 2:37 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] recommended IP phon
I've had 0 problems with Polycom IP 560's...but I've only been using them for a
week with SipXecs.
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, David Sharafy wrote:
From: David Sharafy
Subject: [sipx-users] recommended IP phone for sipXecs
To: "sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org"
Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 1:40
Hi,
Can someone recommended me an IP phone that works great with Sipx? I have been
using Cisco phones for my remote users but there is always a problem, specially
with NATting..
Thanks
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List
The safeties off are the method the sipx iso installs a system. Nothing is
irreversible either.
Take a nice pill or finding someone else to pick on on, because I don't play
that game. Have fun!
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tg
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, ... wrote:
> Make sure iptables is off. Is selinux on and enforcing? If
> so, reverse that too (disabled).
and ... followed up with yet another ready description on how
to disable the safeties
you know -- this is just a poor response all around ...
I understand that the
I did not copy over any files...
I copied files from a version 4.2.1 that were missing:
authorities.jks
ssl.keystore
ssl-web.keystore
After this sipxcongif ui worked.
I used the sipXecs-system-setup script. I got no errors while running
the script, just the errors afterwards when trying to start
Tony,
Per your recommendation, I worked to make the necessary repos changes and then
successfully upgraded the system to version 4.2.1. Then we made test calls
again today and we are still experiencing the same symptoms/issues with the
specific inbound calls.
What would be the best tool/method
Is the snom configured manually? Do you have it set to "force domain"? What
does the registration look like for it?
Just like xlite when used remotely, the m3 needs to send its local address.
Ice/turn/stun off.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434
What files did you copy over, and why?
Cert files from another system will likely break things.
What setup script did you run, and did it return any errors when you did?
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment
I also tried to see what's wrong with sipxproc. Are services are
disabled, when I try to start one it's get the state:
"ConfigurationMismatch"
When I get the statusmessage is contains: ["version.mismatch: software
'0.0.4.5.1' != config ''"]
Something in the installation?
From: sipx-users-boun
L I cheered to early...
I can reach the sipxconfig UI but all the services are down
Can't restart them I get the error: Error restarting services on
server1.sipxecs3.test.colos.telecats.nl
These jobs also fail:
File replication: sipxbridge.xml 12/10/10 5:09 PM
12/10/10 5:09
I am assuming you want to see all network activity coming and out of
snom m3. If so, I am not sure how to do a wireshark trace on that.
Actually, I could get a sip trace from snom m3. Would that do?
Thanks
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Nikolay Kondratyev wrote:
> Can you capture a trace v
Fixed it! J
Just copied the missing files from my other test server (4.2.1) and this
worked J
Thanks everybody for tips and help J
Now let's test openACD :D
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Henry
Dogger
Sent: vrijdag 10
Well I use the DNS from sipXecs in that VLAN but the hostname is not
reachable from the VLAN I'm in J
So I guess it should be no problem since sipXecs is running the DNS
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Picher
Sen
Can you capture a trace via wireshark on the port where m3 is connected?
The thing is that sipx does "media relay" for remote workers, but sipx does
it in a bit complicated way...
Not all phones understand the way, sipx does "media relay".
I suspect that snom does send rtp to remote worker but it
DNS doesn't technically matter for a web server however the sipXecs services
may not be functioning properly... always get your DNS set first (specially
if you are using an off-system dns).
Mike
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Henry Dogger wrote:
> >It complains about the cert not found, but
>It complains about the cert not found, but why is it binding http on
port
>8443 to ip 0.0.0.0?
I don't know ran the script, I did not set this up myself
>Make sure apache is not starting by itself
>chkconfig httpd off
I did this, no result in behavior
>ensure the ssl directory is there. If
The registration of snom as seen by sipx
As seen from snom m3
REGISTER sip:mydomain.com SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.12.254;branch=z9hG4bKdh3clvy20vd2rx3gmj
Max-Forwards: 70
From: ;tag=xu8a.na7d
To:
Call-ID: 5q3ug.6i1m18qu715e1e68r5
CSeq: 45463 REGISTER
Contact:
Allow: INVITE, CANCEL, BYE,
Ensure gruu is disabled on snom.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427
Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://ww
I've just added a patch to provisioning plugin that allows to reload
config file without reboot the phone.
I'm testing it with snom phones on 0.4.4 branch
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9292
give it a try.
thanks
Domenico Chierico
___
sipx-use
The local phone is snom m3 and the remote phone is x-lite. I did a
tcpdump on sipx server and it shows rtp traffic proxied to the snom
phone. However, I don't see rtp traffic from snom phone to sipx.
Please note, the external phone calls (via sip trunk) from remote
worker phone are working fine.
It complains about the cert not found, but why is it binding http on port
8443 to ip 0.0.0.0?
Make sure apache is not starting by itself
chkconfig httpd off
ensure the ssl directory is there. If so are there any files in it?
Did you run the setup script? If so, is that really the hostname?
Ok, thanks that worked, httpd is now running :)
But get the following error when trying to access the webpage:
"2010-12-10T08:53:29.795000Z":1:JAVA:INFO:server1.sipxecs3.test.colos.te
lecats.nl:main::DynamicSessionFactoryBean:"Building new
Hibernate SessionFactory"
"2010-12-10T08:53:41.589
If you run
setstatus
It will tell you the selinux status and policy.
With centos 5 you can edit the selinux config directly
/etc/selinux/config
And change the policy to disabled with
SELINUX=disabled
If it is enabled or permissive. All selinux changes need a reboot to be
persistent though.
In your grub.conf file you would pass a kernel argument at the end of the
kernel line (or edit the one that is there).
selinux=0
Then save the file.
chkconfig iptables off
service iptables stop
Then if selinux is running, a reboot would be required.
Tony Graziano,
Thanks,
Can you point me in a direction where to find these settings?
Henry
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony
Graziano
Sent: vrijdag 10 december 2010 14:02
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Su
Make sure iptables is off. Is selinux on and enforcing? If so, reverse that
too (disabled).
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.842
What kind of phone? What does the registration look like? How is the phone
configured? Does tje remote firewall have sip alg and spi disabled?
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security a
Hi all,
I'm trying to install sipXecs snapshot 0.0.4.5.1 to test the openACD
functionality.
But after installing the sipXecs, I get an error on starting sipXecs,
namely:
(13)Permission denied: make_sock: could not bind to address [::]:8091
(13)Permission denied: make_sock: could not bind
42 matches
Mail list logo
