it sounds as if the FreeSWITCH reload never happened at upgrade (would have
been observable in jobstatus). it is always advisable to resend server
profiles after an update/upgrade and to observe the job status.
a FreeSWITCH reload failure may not provide a flagged status so a human
overview is des
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Norman Branitsky
wrote:
> On 11-06-27 11:29 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
>>
>> is howard the "only" mailbox without a subscriber as a number?
>>
> All userids are alphanumeric names; all users have a numeric alias -
> Howard's is 215.
>
> So it seems that Heisenberg wo
On 11-06-27 11:29 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
>
> is howard the "only" mailbox without a subscriber as a number?
>
All userids are alphanumeric names; all users have a numeric alias -
Howard's is 215.
So it seems that Heisenberg works here.
Turning on/off the debug level for Voicemail and Autoattend
200 OK must be ACKed by the caller so thats a definite bug on the caller
ua. it should ACK the 200 Ok then send an immediate BYE. As to the
reinvite from sipxbridge, most definitely a bug as well. can you open a
tracker?
On 06/28/2011 01:04 AM, Sven Evensen wrote:
We seem to have encount
We seem to have encountered a race condition between a CANCEL and a 200 OK. The
result of this
is a call stuck in sipxBridge causing phantom calls every two hours (session
timeout).
In the attached trace.xml, port 5560 is our application. It cancels the
outgoing call a few milliseconds
bef
and the phone has been resent its profile and rebooted?
it needs to be enabled for the alert-info header. if it is not enabled in a
paging group a ns sent the profile it will not work.
the audio part speaks firewall or Intranet settings.
On Jun 27, 2011 11:56 AM, "andrewpitman" wrote:
>
> Conten
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> 1.) I lose random emails from dave deutchmen. They do not wind up in spam.
> 2.) after sending an email, i randomly lose my copy of the email in my
> sent folder.
>
> anyone else have these issues or am i going nuts?
are the issues mutually exclusive?
I don't know if I have missed any emails from him. I would suspect an email
filter though.
can you find the missing email in a search?
On Jun 27, 2011 12:26 PM, "Douglas Hubler" wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Philippe Laurent wrote:
>> I've not observed any issues...
>
> thanks every
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Philippe Laurent wrote:
> I've not observed any issues...
thanks everyone. I actually meant to send this internally ;) but your
input was helpful.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive
I've not observed any issues...
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> 1.) I lose random emails from dave deutchmen. They do not wind up in spam.
> 2.) after sending an email, i randomly lose my copy of the email in my
> sent folder.
>
> anyone else have these issues or am i
Not that I have noticed.
--Original Message--
From: Douglas Hubler
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
To: sipx-users
ReplyTo: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: [sipx-users] gmail issues, anyone else?
Sent: Jun 27, 2011 11:12 AM
1.) I lose random emails fro
1.) I lose random emails from dave deutchmen. They do not wind up in spam.
2.) after sending an email, i randomly lose my copy of the email in my
sent folder.
anyone else have these issues or am i going nuts?
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <61124>
Message-ID:
Tony Graziano wrote on Fri, 24 June 2011 05:45
> try a paging group of one remote phone. my guess is it
> will
is howard the "only" mailbox without a subscriber as a number?
create a new account for howard as numerical only. does that work?
Ive always been adamant that alphanumeric usernames should be aliases to cut
down on potential errors.
On Jun 27, 2011 11:15 AM, "Norman Branitsky"
wrote:
> On 11-06-
On 11-06-26 3:51 PM, George Niculae wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Norman Branitsky
> wrote:
>> Only user "howard" is affected.
>> There are lots of brand new messages in his mailbox - XX-9461 talks
>> about messages with bad date stamps.
>> I emptied out his INBOX at one point to no
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Norman Branitsky
wrote:
> There are lots of brand new messages in his mailbox - XX-9461 talks about
> messages with bad date stamps.
> I emptied out his INBOX at one point to no avail.
that may not address the improper xml. Look at the xml w/text editor,
you'll b
16 matches
Mail list logo
