You ought to describe what iphone UA (app) you are using.
#1: you should be registering over port 5060 (not 5061). 5061 assumes
tls/encryption, which will be quite a burden on any portable IMO. It's also
not fully functional in sipx with every UA yet either.
#2: You should inspect your
Hi Tony
Actually the UA seems to be acting fine. As I mentioned, I can make internal
calls so I'm not too worried about that. The problem is when an outside call is
made. Hooked up Briapath and pulled a log and here's what I get...
[11-12-18]19:25:39.248 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | mRemoteTarget:
Well the transport layer is secure anyway...
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Pete Burgess pburg...@itsco.com wrote:
Thanks for the pointers. I’ll check out the configs and go from there.
** **
As for why I’m registering on 5061, it would just appear to be more secure
to me. My
Thanks for the pointers. I'll check out the configs and go from there.
As for why I'm registering on 5061, it would just appear to be more secure to
me. My understanding is that if I do everything via TLS then a) it's encrypted
and b) I don't have to put up with potential LD/International call
Hi folks
I've been doing some testing with a Sip client on an iPhone and I'm having
problems. Essentially, I have port 5061 open to the internet and I can make
internal calls just fine, i.e. I hook my iPhone up to my wireless internet at
home, connect to the public IP of the SipX server, dial
I don't think you follow me. HOW you have the Bria configured means a lot.
I use 3cs on my iphones. I use eith csipsimple or on ICS I use the native
sip account function (fine for wifi). I also use Patton gateways. I never
have a problem with this.
There are settings in different UA's on how they
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: fe4a.4efcc...@forum.sipfoundry.org
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 65099
Message-ID: fe4b.4efcc...@forum.sipfoundry.org
Well, instead of 2.0 firmware, 3.2.6 would be
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: fe4c.4efcc...@forum.sipfoundry.org
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 65101
Message-ID: fe4d.4efcc...@forum.sipfoundry.org
yes, and btw... nobody really reads the
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: fe46.4efc9...@forum.sipfoundry.org
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 65102
Message-ID: fe4e.4efcc...@forum.sipfoundry.org
um, put an extension on the dial plan entry
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: fe40.4efc5...@forum.sipfoundry.org
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 65103
Message-ID: fe4f.4efcc...@forum.sipfoundry.org
sounds like it's not registered... check
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: fe45.4efc9...@forum.sipfoundry.org
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 65105
Message-ID: fe51.4efcc...@forum.sipfoundry.org
You might want to get on the mailing lists as
I need to install 4 separate sipx systems in four separate locations. No
interoffice communications.
All of the sipx systems could benefit from the use of a VPRI rather than
traditional.
I use ITSP's for individual lines when we need an area code that our local
telco cannot handle.
On sipx, I
I dont know VPRI means. If you use terms noone but you might understand you
might explain it a bit. Throwing that aside...
flowroute is a two-edged sword: Use the bandwidth.com template and change
the bandwidth.com gateway stuff to your flowroute gateway. make sure
flowroute is swet to send to
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:20:57 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote:
I dont know VPRI means. If you use terms noone but you might understand you
might explain it a bit. Throwing that aside...
When I don't use the right terms, I get grief and when I use the terms I'm
seeing in docs, I still get grief :).
flowroute does not control
the majority of their network and hence, RTP does not come from the same IP
as the gateway. You pretty much have to open everything to use flowroute if
I've seen plenty of posts from folks asking which ITSP might be better over
another but what about for resiliency
Yes, but what is a virtual PRI? Since PRI is an ISDN standard, what is the
non-standard derivative that comes out of a Virtual PRI? What is it
exactly?
Is it maybe a PRI that is fed out of device that is actually fed via a T1
with SIP trunks on it? If it is, its still a PRI, conforming to
I've used Broadvox with customers for over three years. I can't recall an
out of service for any of my customers on their network. They have built a
carrier grade network, 5 9's availability.
I've used VOIP.ms for three years as well - but can't say the same about
their reliability. They
sigh
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:55:11 -0800, Todd Hodgen wrote:
Yes, but what is a virtual PRI? Since PRI is an ISDN standard, what is the
non-standard derivative that comes out of a Virtual PRI? What is it
exactly?
Is it maybe a PRI that is fed out of device that is actually fed via a T1
We've been using voip.ms for some time now and haven't had any problems but
we've never had a server using only an ITSP until now either. The servers I've
installed usually have a PRI gateway and an ITSP is used for deals on LD.
The servers I need to put in place would be the first time I've
Sigh what? Mike, read about PRI -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_Services_Digital_Network
Find one reference to virtual PRI. Sorry, I don't follow Flowroute, in
fact, since it wasn't capitalized, I wondered what it is. They do reference
some VPRI on their website, and they give no
Is there a way to give a group of users access to manage a subset of
auto-attendant's without giving them superadmin access?
-Bryan Anderson
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive:
I don't believe so. How about setting up an extension with shared
credentials, and use the Personal Auto Attendant with that extension in
voicemail. You might get the occasional email to manage, but could set it
up on a phone and forward them to staff to manage as emails.
Otherwise, it would
Sigh what? Mike, read about PRI -
Sigh... because you took the time to agree with Tony, giving me grief while at
the same time pointing out that you were not doing that. Of course you were.
Since Tony had already made his point, why did you need to bring it up again?
You then post a
Your post went to the list...
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Harper ger...@sustaa.com
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:51:36
To: m...@grounded.net; Discussion list for users of sipXecs
softwaresipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Reply-To: Discussion
Yup realized right after I clicked send. Oh well. (can't we all just get
along?)
On 12/29/2011 8:54 PM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) wrote:
Your post went to the list...
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Harperger...@sustaa.com
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Date:
25 matches
Mail list logo
