Re: [sipx-users] Generate CSR Question

2012-04-20 Thread Tony Graziano
It is on the tracker. I think the GUI needs to be adjusted to allow it. I also know 4.6 has major cert rework, maybe it can be posted to the dev list whether it is being addressed in 4.6 or not. http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9390 All of the above (intermediate and changing the script to 2

Re: [sipx-users] Generate CSR Question

2012-04-20 Thread Robert Schroeder
I also had to drop the Certificate Authorities CRT files for GoDaddy of gd-class2-root.crt, gd_intermediate.crt & gdroot-g2.crt into the( /etc/sipxpbx/ssl/authorities ) directory. I restarted the sipxecs service and then proceeded to add the web certificate downloaded from GoDaddy. sipXecs Sy

Re: [sipx-users] Generate CSR Question

2012-04-20 Thread jnolen
Rob, I'd appreciate it if you would not publish my name. Thanks, jim > Yeps, no luck in the search. > > > > However Jim Nolen of IIPS was a great help and gave me the following > information to solve the problem. > > > > Edit: /usr/bin/ssl-cert/gen-ssl-keys.sh: > > ServerKeyBits=1024

Re: [sipx-users] Generate CSR Question

2012-04-20 Thread Robert Schroeder
Yeps, no luck in the search. However Jim Nolen of IIPS was a great help and gave me the following information to solve the problem. Edit: /usr/bin/ssl-cert/gen-ssl-keys.sh: ServerKeyBits=1024[change to 2048] If I knew how to add this info to the wiki I would. Perhaps a feature could be

Re: [sipx-users] Generate CSR Question

2012-04-20 Thread Tony Graziano
I seem to recall the script may need to be or was it already modified to handle 2048 bit certificates? Besides that I think it had to be done manually AND noone updated the wiki or the list as to whether or not it worked. On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Michael Picher wrote: > did you check th

Re: [sipx-users] Generate CSR Question

2012-04-20 Thread Michael Picher
did you check the wiki? On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Robert Schroeder < robert.schroe...@memberfirstmortgage.com> wrote: > How do I change the configuration for the certificates area to generate a > 2048 bit key instead of a 1024? I have changed the openssl.cnf file in > /etc/pki/tls/ locatio

Re: [sipx-users] Fax Problems (Big Time)

2012-04-20 Thread Robert Schroeder
So far I have had no reports of problems. I am waiting for a bit to know if this issue is resolved completely before posting details of the AC configuration. So Far So Good, From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Grazi

[sipx-users] Generate CSR Question

2012-04-20 Thread Robert Schroeder
How do I change the configuration for the certificates area to generate a 2048 bit key instead of a 1024? I have changed the openssl.cnf file in /etc/pki/tls/ location and selected the generate button and still no 2048 key is generated. I am sure this is an educational issue on my part. Yes I

Re: [sipx-users] SharedAppearanceAgent does not match the software version (4.4.0).

2012-04-20 Thread Kyle Haefner
Dave, Thanks! I turned it off, not sure how it got started. I updated the wiki page to reflect this: http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Roles%2C+Services+and+Processes Kyle On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Dave Deutschman wrote: > Kyle, > > The SharedAppearance Agent is not redundan

Re: [sipx-users] SharedAppearanceAgent does not match the software version (4.4.0).

2012-04-20 Thread Dave Deutschman
Kyle, The SharedAppearance Agent is not redundant and should only be running on the master. It will run on the secondary and Polycom phones will send subscriptions to it and the process on the master. However, it confuses the phones and they stop handling shared line calls properly. There

Re: [sipx-users] SharedAppearanceAgent does not match the software version (4.4.0).

2012-04-20 Thread Tony Graziano
have you compared the rpm versions? On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Kyle Haefner wrote: > Hi Users, > > I'm running Sipx 4.4 in a three node cluster with the most recent > updates for 4.4.0- 2012-02-08EST09:10:08 ip-10-72-10-163. > > In one of the redundant nodes when I get this: > > sudo sipxp

[sipx-users] SharedAppearanceAgent does not match the software version (4.4.0).

2012-04-20 Thread Kyle Haefner
Hi Users, I'm running Sipx 4.4 in a three node cluster with the most recent updates for 4.4.0- 2012-02-08EST09:10:08 ip-10-72-10-163. In one of the redundant nodes when I get this: sudo sipxproc | grep SharedAppearanceAgent "SharedAppearanceAgent"=>"Disabled", In the other redundant node i ge

Re: [sipx-users] Trunk to Trunk Transfer

2012-04-20 Thread Tony Graziano
Please test the following. Calling from PSTN to AA and try to transfer to an extension that is not forwarded. You have to ensure your ITSP is sending the INVITE to port 5080 in order for any transfers to succeed. If not, what Gerald said... how to get around that is to create a dialplan (56+10 d

Re: [sipx-users] Trunk to Trunk Transfer

2012-04-20 Thread Gerald Drouillard
On 4/20/2012 1:08 PM, Tommy Laino wrote: > Content-Type: text/plain; >charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Organization: SipXecs Forum > X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8<67729> > Message-ID:<10891.4f919...@forum.sipfoundry.org> > > > > I have 3 IP trunks on my test sy

[sipx-users] Trunk to Trunk Transfer

2012-04-20 Thread Tommy Laino
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <67729> Message-ID: <10891.4f919...@forum.sipfoundry.org> I have 3 IP trunks on my test system. I am trying to have an option from the auto attend

Re: [sipx-users] Fax Problems (Big Time)

2012-04-20 Thread Tony Graziano
did you do that? if so, did it fix it? On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Robert Schroeder < robert.schroe...@memberfirstmortgage.com> wrote: > Tony, > > ** ** > > Thank you for the suggestion and for your help. > > ** ** > > Rob > > ** ** > > *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry

Re: [sipx-users] Fax Problems (Big Time)

2012-04-20 Thread Robert Schroeder
Tony, Thank you for the suggestion and for your help. Rob From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 11:00 AM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users]

Re: [sipx-users] KIRK wiki guide inserted

2012-04-20 Thread Geoff Van Brunt
Thanks for this. We were thinking of doing it at one of our locations but doing the evaluation is difficult without having the equipment. Geoff Van Brunt From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Laurent Sent: Thursday, Ap

Re: [sipx-users] Nat Problem

2012-04-20 Thread Todd Hodgen
+1 From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Joegen Baclor Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 2:29 AM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Nat Problem I forgive all of you for not noticing that

Re: [sipx-users] Directed call pickup issue.

2012-04-20 Thread Derrick Ding
Thanks, Mike Yes, I am setting up the environment for solving the issue: Aastra phone doesn't accept SUBSCRIBE dialog or presence. Derrick From: Michael Picher [mailto:mpic...@ezuce.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 10:54 AM To: Discussion list for user

Re: [sipx-users] Fax Problems (Big Time)

2012-04-20 Thread Tony Graziano
Sorry, am not a audiocodes guru. I have documented the Patton PRi gateways for use with t.38 in the wiki. Perhaps someone else would be so kind as to do the same for an AC PRI gateway instead of keeping it a big secret and make sure it is also documented on the wiki. Try: Configuration > Protocol

Re: [sipx-users] Directed call pickup issue.

2012-04-20 Thread Michael Picher
I'd grab a capture of this and talk to your engineering folks. This is what we refer to as BLA functionality (bridged line appearance). I would think this would be different from directed call pickup which is *78ext . If you can make this work and help get the Aastra template sorted and new phon

Re: [sipx-users] Bria for iphone/ipod touch registration

2012-04-20 Thread Tony Graziano
Please understand that sipxecs is meant for enterprise deployments. If it were meant for smaller deployments as its market segment things would probably be designed very differently, hence the prerequisite reading and architectural understanding. It is not aimed at users either, it's aimed at dens

Re: [sipx-users] Bria for iphone/ipod touch registration

2012-04-20 Thread Stiles Watson
Tony, The original intent of the email was to offer some constructive criticism and explain a little of my confusion. I never intended to make it personal. I realize that my "never let go of that bone" comment made it personal, and for that, I apologize. You guys have a superior product and

[sipx-users] Directed call pickup issue.

2012-04-20 Thread Derrick Ding
Hi All, I use SipXecs as proxy server, and register an 2 Aastra phone and Polycom phone. I can monitor Polycom phone(phone number 203) from Aastra phone(phone number 200). However when I do "directed call pickup", Aastra phone send "INVITE *78203" to SipXecs, SipXec only responds 100 Trying, t

Re: [sipx-users] Fax Problems (Big Time)

2012-04-20 Thread Robert Schroeder
Tony: I did find a Fax Signaling Method of T.38 Relay under the Coders And Profile Definitions - IP Profile Settings - Gateway Parameters - Fax Signaling Method. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: F

Re: [sipx-users] Fax Problems (Big Time)

2012-04-20 Thread Robert Schroeder
Tony, Thank you for the suggestion. Are you referring to the G711Mulaw setting under Bypass Settings? The only other option is G711Alaw_64. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 9:

Re: [sipx-users] Fax Problems (Big Time)

2012-04-20 Thread George Niculae
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Robert Schroeder wrote: > George, > It's Voicemail and AA, however pay attention to Tony's reply: sipx only support t.38 George ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoun

Re: [sipx-users] Fax Problems (Big Time)

2012-04-20 Thread Tony Graziano
faxing into sipx only support t.38 and your audiocodes fax settings have g711u. you need to change it to t.38. On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Robert Schroeder < robert.schroe...@memberfirstmortgage.com> wrote: > Has anyone had problems with faxing into sipXecs? We are having huge > problems wit

Re: [sipx-users] Fax Problems (Big Time)

2012-04-20 Thread George Niculae
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Robert Schroeder wrote: > Has anyone had problems with faxing into sipXecs? We are having huge > problems with faxes being delivered to the users emails as zero page tiff’s. > It is not an every fax occurrence however it is at a rate that I am no > longer able to r

[sipx-users] Fax Problems (Big Time)

2012-04-20 Thread Robert Schroeder
Has anyone had problems with faxing into sipXecs? We are having huge problems with faxes being delivered to the users emails as zero page tiff's. It is not an every fax occurrence however it is at a rate that I am no longer able to rely upon the faxing delivery capabilities of sipXecs. I am tryi