[sipx-users] Fedora 16 and 503 Issues from May 14

2012-05-15 Thread Mike Pinkerton
All: I'm new here -- so apologies if I breach protocol. I am trying to run sipxecs on a standard install of Fedora 16. I tried to install the latest stable, which apparently is a build for Fedora 14, which is past its end of life. That set of packages has dependency issues on Fedora 16.

Re: [sipx-users] Fedora 16 and 503 Issues from May 14

2012-05-15 Thread Tony Graziano
The development build is installable on fedora 6. The eventual 4.6 release should have no issues I think. On May 15, 2012 9:00 AM, Mike Pinkerton pseli...@mindspring.com wrote: All: I'm new here -- so apologies if I breach protocol. I am trying to run sipxecs on a standard install of Fedora

Re: [sipx-users] Fedora 16 and 503 Issues from May 14

2012-05-15 Thread Michael Picher
i think he means CentOS 6 On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote: The development build is installable on fedora 6. The eventual 4.6 release should have no issues I think. On May 15, 2012 9:00 AM, Mike Pinkerton pseli...@mindspring.com wrote:

Re: [sipx-users] Fedora 16 and 503 Issues from May 14

2012-05-15 Thread Joegen Baclor
New to sipx and installing a development snapshot is a brave move. Snapshot is currently under extreme development. I do not advise using it now unless you know your way around the architecture. Much has changed and is changing in 4.6. If using fedora is really essential to your needs,

Re: [sipx-users] Fedora 16 and 503 Issues from May 14

2012-05-15 Thread Mike Pinkerton
That is a very kind way of saying foolish move. Before stepping all the way back to Fedora 14, I might try another foolish move -- installing 4.4 stable on Fedora 16 with a couple of Fedora 14 packages thrown in to cover the missing dependencies. If that doesn't work, then I'll go back to

[sipx-users] setting IM status to busy/away if user is on the phone

2012-05-15 Thread Claas Hilbrecht
Hello Experts, I wonder if there's a way to set the IM status to busy or away if someone is on the phone. Today I configured the IM feature in sipXecs and start playing with that. I can see that a phone is ringging or that someone is one the phone with pidgin in the extended status

Re: [sipx-users] setting IM status to busy/away if user is on the phone

2012-05-15 Thread George Niculae
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Claas Hilbrecht claas.hilbrecht+maillinglists.sipx...@linum.com wrote: Hello Experts, I wonder if there's a way to set the IM status to busy or away if someone is on the phone. Today I configured the IM feature in sipXecs and start playing with that. I can

Re: [sipx-users] setting IM status to busy/away if user is on the phone

2012-05-15 Thread Claas Hilbrecht
I tried to changed the message On the phone to something else and restarted the phone and IM server but the message remains On the phone. What system needs to be restarted to get the setting change active? It should be automatically picked up when you change the On the phone message within

Re: [sipx-users] setting IM status to busy/away if user is on the phone

2012-05-15 Thread Tony Graziano
Is the user part of an IM group? On May 15, 2012 11:36 AM, Claas Hilbrecht claas.hilbrecht+maillinglists.sipx...@linum.com wrote: I tried to changed the message On the phone to something else and restarted the phone and IM server but the message remains On the phone. What system needs to

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple sip trunks to the same ITSP - limits/issues?

2012-05-15 Thread Bryan Anderson
Is this still the same or can you now place two gateways to the same ITSP to the same address? -Bryan Anderson On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think that will be addressed in 4.4... You could of course do this with SBC's or a gateway at each

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple sip trunks to the same ITSP - limits/issues?

2012-05-15 Thread Tony Graziano
The issue is still with bipxbridge anchoring the trunking in that it can only register to ONE itsp accounting using the same destination. i.e. Cannot register TWO trunks to provider gateway abc.trunkiprovider.tld but it can register one to -- abc.trunkiprovider.tld and another to

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple sip trunks to the same ITSP - limits/issues?

2012-05-15 Thread Nathaniel Watkins
Has anyone ever tried setting up different A records internally (or on their own publically controlled DNS Server) for the same external IP address - would this allow you to register to the same actual IP address - or does the IP have to be different? i.e. trying to register to: