[sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Scheidell
I recently moved sipx 4.4.0 off of an old dell 750 with 1gb ram. (it was crashing, corrupted the postgres db to the point of no return) I put it on an old dell 750 with 1.5Gb ram. the gui is SO MUCH MORE RESPONSIVE as to be unbelievable. 35 users (including virtual users) 18 phones. Mem:

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Picher
Well, 2 GB is the minimum recommended for 4.4. 4 GB is the minimum recommended for 4.6. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: I recently moved sipx 4.4.0 off of an old dell 750 with 1gb ram. (it was crashing, corrupted the postgres db to

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Scheidell
looks like I need a bigger box! On 8/15/12 8:54 AM, Michael Picher wrote: Well, 2 GB is the minimum recommended for 4.4. 4 GB is the minimum recommended for 4.6. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Scheidell
32 bit vs 64 bit? or doesn't matter? 64bit usually take up more address space, best I can tell. any advantage to (on 4.4? 4.6)? backing up my 32bit, getting a 64bit system, restoring it? On 8/15/12 8:54 AM, Michael Picher wrote: Well, 2 GB is the minimum recommended for 4.4. 4 GB is the

Re: [sipx-users] Adding more Sip Proxy Fail replication

2012-08-15 Thread Martin Rodriguez
Michael: I still have doubts or think I was clear. I have 1 SIP Server SIP Primaryand 4 Redundant SIP Router. I need add one more in my architecture. The limitation that you mention, is correct? or Only apply in 5 Primary SIP Servers? Thanks Martin On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Douglas

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: 32 bit vs 64 bit? or doesn't matter? 64bit usually take up more address space, best I can tell. definitely 64 bit because mongo db strongly recommends it any advantage to (on 4.4? 4.6)? backing up my

Re: [sipx-users] Adding more Sip Proxy Fail replication

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Picher
i thought i was perfectly clear... you have 5 now... max allowed. how many users do you have such that you need a 5 server system. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Martin Rodriguez gmartin...@gmail.comwrote: Michael: I still have doubts or think I was clear. I have 1 SIP Server SIP

Re: [sipx-users] Adding more Sip Proxy Fail replication

2012-08-15 Thread Martin Rodriguez
My architecture is: * 1 Sipx Proxy Sip Primary in Argentina (2000 users) Dell R210 Xeon DualCore X3430 2.40GHz - 8 GB RAM * 1 Sipx Conference Only (3000 Bridges) * 1 Sipx Proxy Sip and Conference in Uruguay (250 users) * 1 Sipx Proxy Sip and Conference in Colombia (150 users) * 1 Sipx Proxy Sip

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Robert B
It's the stupid JVM... All those java processes gobble up memory for seemingly nothing more than shits and giggles. (Or it's remnant of the days when Sun sold servers and they wanted you to buy as much of their overpriced RAM as your wallet could tolerate.) This isn't a sipx issue, of course.

Re: [sipx-users] Adding more Sip Proxy Fail replication

2012-08-15 Thread Tony Graziano
I doubt you have enough RAM for 3000 conference bridges or 2000 users to operate at any load, and maybe you have the conferences but only have a few active at any time. If your processors are healthy (higher amount of L2 cache), they perform better. However, the USERUI, conference and media

[sipx-users] Thailand DID provider

2012-08-15 Thread Burleigh, Matt
Anyone know a good international DID provider? Need a reliable provider for Thailand. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Tony Graziano
Old argument. I've made it myself. Not sure the motive was to make people buy more memory, just how they wanted to make everything in memory and less dependent on storage. It's a two-edged sword for sure though. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Robert B d...@spudland.com wrote: It's the

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Scheidell
I worked for a company that sold 'real time' tools (real time as in, missile control, fly by wire, nuclear containment) if the tank for 'hot', you need to start the process (automatically) to pull the rods in 50 us (microseconds) someone came up with a 'real time java'. the biggest problem

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Joegen Baclor
On 08/16/2012 12:42 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: you hear see the engineers at DOS, DISA, NASA, United Defense, laugh when you talk about 'real time java' Really not a place to ridicule a tool where such tool shined. (coming from a C++ perspective)

Re: [sipx-users] sipx really likes 1.5GB ram

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 8/15/12 12:56 PM, Joegen Baclor wrote: On 08/16/2012 12:42 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: you hear see the engineers at DOS, DISA, NASA, United Defense, laugh when you talk about 'real time java' Really not a place to ridicule a tool where such tool shined. (coming from a C++ perspective)

Re: [sipx-users] Cisco Hold/Resume

2012-08-15 Thread Joegen Baclor
This is the INVITE sent by sipX to extension 9630. Take note of the following. 1. Contact given by sipXbridge is sip:+1214xxx@192.168.2.2:5090 2. Record-Route inserted by the proxy is sip:192.168.2.2:5060;lr; \ sipXecs-CallDest=AL%2CINT; \