I'm just experiencing problem building rpm for sipXecs-4.6, seems that
sipXportLib spec file add libsipXport.la in both regular rpm and -develop
one.
thanks
Domenico Chierico
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive:
Hi Domenico,
We'll modify the spec file to add the libsipXport.la only in the devel rpm
for sipXecs-4.6 from release-4.6-updates branch.
Regards,
Daniel
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Domenico Chierico
domenico.chier...@sip2ser.it wrote:
I'm just experiencing problem building rpm for
that's perfect for us, but I'm seeing that in other packages the la lib is
in standard rpm not in devel..
ref to
sipXtackLib
sipXcommserverLib
thanks
Domenico Chierico
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Daniel Tacalau dtaca...@ezuce.com wrote:
Hi Domenico,
We'll modify the spec file to add
I'm having a hard time trying to update a certificate in my setup with two
boxes:
- Primary server has all the roles, but ACD
- Secondary server has only ACD role
I have read both wiki pages:
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/SSL+Certificates
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Melcon Moraes mel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, so it seems it is happening in other places of the system as well. I
was experiencing configurations not being updated for OpenACD,
Autoattendants in FS.
That seems like a different issue. I 2nd George's advice to send
Hi Ali,
we tried to follow your advice.
However setting to null the group outbound proxy parameter
doesn't affect phone line parameter because in the group
profile, the default value of that parameter is null.
I found a workaround by changing the default value to sip
domain in
Looks like we'll need changes in spec files for all libs. I've opened an
internal report to keep track of this issue.
Is this an issue for you?
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Domenico Chierico
domenico.chier...@sip2ser.it wrote:
that's perfect for us, but I'm seeing that in other packages
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Melcon Moraes mel...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having a hard time trying to update a certificate in my setup with two
boxes:
- Primary server has all the roles, but ACD
- Secondary server has only ACD role
I have read both wiki pages:
The way Audiocodes SAS is generally deployed is that the outbound proxy for
the primary registrar is set to your Audicodes gateway, port 5080. This way
the Audiocodes has a record of all registrations and can service them in
the event of an outage. See
no not for me ..I'm just ready to follow your specification.
So one or other is the same for me.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Tacalau dtaca...@ezuce.com wrote:
Looks like we'll need changes in spec files for all libs. I've opened an
internal report to keep track of this issue.
I'm pleased to announce sipXecs release 4.6.0. There will most
certainly be updates to this release in the form of new RPMs published
in the coming weeks, so if you've reported issues against 4.6.0, it's
quite possible they'll be out soon. Given that, this release should be
considered ready for
CONGRATULATIONS!!!
4.6 is a huge milestone! Thank you for this huge job!!!
2012/12/6 Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com
I'm pleased to announce sipXecs release 4.6.0. There will most
certainly be updates to this release in the form of new RPMs published
in the coming weeks, so if you've
Release party: when and where??? :-)
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Михаил Родионов ma...@siplabs.ru wrote:
CONGRATULATIONS!!!
4.6 is a huge milestone! Thank you for this huge job!!!
2012/12/6 Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com
I'm pleased to announce sipXecs release 4.6.0. There will
In Maine tonight. .. bring beer.
On Dec 5, 2012 1:14 PM, Josh Patten jpat...@ezuce.com wrote:
Release party: when and where??? :-)
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Михаил Родионов ma...@siplabs.ru wrote:
CONGRATULATIONS!!!
4.6 is a huge milestone! Thank you for this huge job!!!
I can be late :)
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com wrote:
In Maine tonight. .. bring beer.
On Dec 5, 2012 1:14 PM, Josh Patten jpat...@ezuce.com wrote:
Release party: when and where??? :-)
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Михаил Родионов
I think I’ll opt for the satellite party
Kudos all!
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Picher
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 2:40 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users]
What better day than Repeal Day!
http://www.repealday.org/
Cheers and thanks to all involved in getting this out!
Alan Worstell
A1 Networks - Systems Administrator
VTSP, dCAA, LPIC-1, Linux+, CLA, DCTS
(707)570-2021 x204
For support issues please email supp...@a-1networks.com or call
Congratulations and thank you all!
-Bryan Anderson
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Alan Worstell aworst...@a-1networks.comwrote:
What better day than Repeal Day!
http://www.repealday.org/
Cheers and thanks to all involved in getting this out!
Alan Worstell
A1 Networks - Systems
Alan: all the more reason to celebrate.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Alan Worstell aworst...@a-1networks.comwrote:
What better day than Repeal Day!
http://www.repealday.org/
Cheers and thanks to all involved in getting this out!
Alan Worstell
A1 Networks - Systems Administrator
Allan: It was all part of the plan. I know it. :)
Congratulations and thank you all!
-
MM
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Josh Patten jpat...@ezuce.com wrote:
Alan: all the more reason to celebrate.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Alan Worstell
aworst...@a-1networks.comwrote:
What
Thanks for your reply, Mircea.
It really help'd me figure it out.
- Short version
In a timeline, this is what happened:
1 - Installed a server - New CA and Certificates
2 - After some months, installed a second server. - New certificate for new
server, using existing CA
3 - Certificates for the
I'm looking for anyone that has interfaced sipXecs with a Polycom Conference
Bridge's SIP Audio capabilities. I'm working on rounding up the technical
specifications for their product, which I assume is a standard SIP endpoint,
but am really guessing right now until I see specs.
If anyone
Congratulations Douglas to you and your entire Team. This substantial
release demonstrates a new level of flexibility and reliability to an
already world class product! A warm thank you to everyone involved!!!
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Hi all,
In 4.4 we had users set up speed dial buttons that were also intercom
buttons, ie *76 where was the extension of the monitored line. It
was nice because users could have presence and an intercom speed dial
button all-in-one. In 4.6 this does not appear to work. Was this a
It's not removed in 4.6. It is a regression that is getting fixed at
this very moment. It's one of those quirks trying to improve
performance of RLS an you break something along the way. You will get
this feature back in the next update.
On 12/06/2012 11:22 AM, Kyle Haefner wrote:
Hi all,
4.7.0 dev build includes support for 4.0 Polycom FW version. Test drivers
needed ;)
We have outlined the changes to the system in a wiki page:
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Changes+in+4.7+Provisioning+for+Polycom
Regards,
C
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Douglas Hubler
Thank you. I will start my testing on Saturday.
-Bryan Anderson
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Cristi Starasciuc cstarasc...@ezuce.comwrote:
4.7.0 dev build includes support for 4.0 Polycom FW version. Test drivers
needed ;)
We have outlined the changes to the system in a wiki page:
Hi All,
if you're interested deploying small 4.6 instances - Josh is running one on
a 1G machine and everything looks good so far. The only change needed is to
start sipxconfig with less maximum memory heap size (that is by default
-Xmx1024m), so in /etc/init.d/sipxconfig replace -Xmx1024m with
28 matches
Mail list logo
