http://www.sipfoundry.org/blog/1084285/new-sipxecs-user-forums-available-this-we-1
says
"as of 12/12/2012 SIPfoundry mailing lists will no longer be available or
accessible (includes sipx-users, sipx-dev and sipx-infrastructure mailing
lists)"
I'm confused...
__
From http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/FreeSWITCH+SIP+Trunking+Gateway
by way of the [SFwiki] list this morning:
> As of FreeSWITCH version 1.2.3, FreeSWITCH mod_sofia has become mature enough
> to handle all signalling demands from sipXecs, and can be used as a SIP
> trunking/call rou
This makes a lot of sense to me.
On Aug 18, 2012, at 5:03 , Michael Picher wrote:
> The other option here, which is where I had hoped were were heading with 4.6,
> is to have a userID and an Extension field (not extension as an alias). This
> way, a userID is really a userID and an extension
On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:36 , Mircea Carasel wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Burleigh, Matt
> wrote:
> Anyone know what the changes are for Bria 3.4.2? There are no release notes
> or anything about it on Counterpath’s website. But all of over Bria users are
> being asked to upgrade to
a, sorta, real
> different.
>
> What you are seeing is correct.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Just noticed that my NAT Traversal page (static public IP) is set for ports
> 5060/5061. If I'm
Just noticed that my NAT Traversal page (static public IP) is set for ports
5060/5061. If I'm using sipXbridge, should this be 5080/5081?
thanks~
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archi
Fixed in latest 4.6.0-233 CentOS RPMs.
thanks~
On Jul 30, 2012, at 14:11 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Created http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10340
>
> Quite likely a release blocker, but not my call.
___
sipx-users mailing list
s
l issues. 4.6 is being actively worked on. if you are trying to press
> something into production, 4.4 would be "safe" at this time.
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Diffs are below -- first two are expected but don't know much about the M
Created http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10340
Quite likely a release a blocker, but not my call.
On Jul 30, 2012, at 14:05 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> First time running setup script on a freshly built Centos 6 VM:
>
>
> [root@sipx ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network
>
setup, this may take a few minutes...
Finishing system configuration, almost done...
done.
In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration
interface from your web browser at the following URL:
https://"sipx.domain.com";
On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:31 , Kurt Al
Still seeing this in the latest builds, FYI.
On Jul 17, 2012, at 17:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> On the fresh 4.6 install I just started up, the System / Date and Time menu
> still produces:
>
> An internal error has occurred. Click here to continue.
>
> The ntp package i
would be worth
> the look.
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Still no luck getting these to register with 4.6
>
> Phones are showing "network failure" in the registration status and seeing
> timeouts reaching the sipx box.
>
> Ne
both cases.)
On Jul 15, 2012, at 23:27 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:12 , Tony Graziano wrote:
>> I think the thing you are leaving out is the phone config generated by sipx
>> can load a different DNS setting than what you intended, which is why I
>> sugg
happen a jira would be in order.
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Just tried a couple variants of that - first one left the host and domain at
> default and then I manually typed everything else -- that produced the same
> result at the end:
>
On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:22 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
> We scrape host and domain from
>
> /etc/sysconfig/network
>
> so it probably *was* wrong there too. That value comes from using the
> network config tool we launch from the setup-setup script. I say "was"
> because we in turn write it ba
om
at the end.
thanks~
On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:01 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> perhaps re-run the script and manually input the host and sipdomain (instead
> of hitting enter) to see if it removes the quotes.
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> did
did not add quotes -- and the URL at the end still has them:
[root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup --reset-all
This will wipe all configuration data from this server. Are you sure? [ enter
'y' or 'n' ] : y
Network settings:
IP address : 192.168.X.26
Would you like to configure your system's network s
did you put double quotes around your host
> name? Can you send me /etc/sipxpbx/sipxconfig.properties?
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>> sipxconfig.log and tail of sipxagent.log (which was 2 MB) attached.
>>
>>
>>
>>
&g
From the freeswitch-users list
Wondering if anyone has seen an effect on sipx media services in 4.6?
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Ken Rice
> Date: July 26, 2012 1:03:38 MDT
> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] What's better Unix ro Windows? LOL
> Reply-To: FreeSW
They did just that at CT Expo for awhile...
On Jul 29, 2012, at 15:48 , Michael Scheidell wrote:
> And if wishes were horses my driveway would prolly be full of crap.
>
> P s, there is an rfc that says the pigs will fly given enough thrust. -:)
___
si
how to
> call them back at 'sally' vs. seeing an extension.
>
> mike
>
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> In a mixed device deployment (hard and soft phones) I can see a couple of
> different ways to configure softphones and am wondering
In a mixed device deployment (hard and soft phones) I can see a couple of
different ways to configure softphones and am wondering about the implications
of each.
I can assign a numeric extension to softphones just like we do for a hard phone.
I can also assign an alpha username based on email a
Ran a 'yum update' on an unconfigured 4.6 (installed on 7/25, the one with the
unmet Homer dependency) and got only a couple of OS updates.
Running 'yum groupupgrade sipxecs' yielded 271 updates (now at 4.6.0.233)
Did a 'yum clean all' and restarted, then ran sipxecs-setup.
Five minutes later, n
One more minor glitch at the end of the script - looks like extra quotes in the
URL:
In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration
interface from your web browser at the following URL:
https://"sipx.domain.com";
On Jul 28, 2012, at 13:53 , Kurt Albersh
Is this the first server in your cluster? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y
Configuring as the first server...
Tip: Use '"sipx.domain.com"' as your SIP domain if you are
setting up for the first time or if you know you are only going to setup one
server. This can make configuration easier. You can always
heir password – they own the
> consequences. There comes a point where reasonable implementation
> strategies and responsible stewardship of your own user account have to meet.
>
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
On Jul 28, 2012, at 6:32 , Mircea Carasel wrote:
> As long as sipxecs/openuc doesn't ship with a well known default
> password. Hackers would write scripts to test logins with those
> passwords. If the feature didn't work until an admin specified a
> default password, that would be fine.
> Yes,
Ran a 'yum update' on my 4.6 test VM today and saw this, so I built a clean VM
and installed from scratch -- same errors at the end of the groupinstall:
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: sipxhomer-4.6.0-18.gf9da.x86_64 (sipXecs)
Requires: libresip.so()(64bit)
Error: P
Thanks for the wake-up!
Found a typo in the alias I setup for testing. Now inbound calls are working.
Back to 4.6 for another round of testing...
On Jul 25, 2012, at 12:51 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> Explain what user or service has a did or alias of 5755195606. That is what
> is. Being sent in
Anyone have insights from this trace?
Thanks~
On Jul 24, 2012, at 14:32 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Attached - thanks.
>
>
>
> On Jul 23, 2012, at 19:29 , Tony Graziano wrote:
>
>> A graphic won't help anyone trouble
I'd ask for more detail on the lightning protection and associated grounding,
especially if you are in a lightning-prone area.
Sending a couple of the failed units to Audiocodes for a post-mortem might help.
On Jul 24, 2012, at 13:29 , Hay, Nathan wrote:
> They are in two locations. Both on
Ack - sorry about the large attachment.
On Jul 23, 2012, at 18:26 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Getting closer - have AON configured (thanks, Tony) on pfSense and am
> receiving signaling on 5080. Now sipx is responding to invites with 302
> first and then 407. There's obviously
On Jul 21, 2012, at 11:08 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> The NAT rules have to be created AFTER the outbound Nat rule otherwise they
> stay randomized.
>
I do understand that, and was planning to do it by choosing Manual (AON) and
then rebuild my ruleset.
> Download the config file made available. Pu
Tony Graziano wrote:
> Read this
>
> http://blog.myitdepartment.net/?p=37
>
> On Jul 20, 2012 9:06 PM, "Tony Graziano" wrote:
> Your outbound Nat type needs to be set for "static port" before your Nat
> rules are created.
>
> On Jul 20, 2012 8:03
4
On Jul 20, 2012, at 17:36 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> What is the firewall?
>
> On Jul 20, 2012 7:22 PM, "Kurt Albershardt" wrote:
> Packets appear not to be making it out of the firewall, despite the fact that
> it is logging them. The sipx box does not receive th
pfSense 1.2.3
On Jul 20, 2012, at 17:36 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> What is the firewall?
>
> On Jul 20, 2012 7:22 PM, "Kurt Albershardt" wrote:
> Packets appear not to be making it out of the firewall, despite the fact that
> it is logging them. The sipx box does no
y npanxx etc.
>
> I would look through the sipXbridge log (tail -f) when the call comes in to
> see what is in the invite.
>
> On Jul 20, 2012 5:11 PM, "Kurt Albershardt" wrote:
> Vitelity sending invites on 5080 now
> Firewall NAT/PAT reconfigured to forward
Vitelity sending invites on 5080 now
Firewall NAT/PAT reconfigured to forward 5080 to 5080
Firewall says it's sending packets to sipx:
Jul 20 14:55:31 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP
Jul 20 14:55:29 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP
Jul 20 14:55:28 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.
ote
> users. IF YOU ARE NOT SUPPORTING REMOTE USERS you do not typically have to
> NAT this OR port 5060. Outbound traffic is typically allowed or not allowd by
> firewalls, we are talking about inbound traffic here.
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>
.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
>
> -Bryan Anderson
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>
> TTY as in TDD?
>
> I spent quite a bit of time looking into this awhile back and the only thing
>
Thanks!
On Jul 20, 2012, at 13:12 , Bryan Anderson wrote:
> I only bring through the 3-31000 range to our systems. Based of what is
> listed under System > Server > "Server" > NAT > "Show Advanced Settings"
>
> -Bryan Anderson
>
&g
Wiki mentions 3-31000 for sipXrelay but I've seen mentions of 15000-15500
in a number of forum posts.
What do I need to allow for sipXbridge <-> ITSP behind NAT (with external
static IP stated, not using a STUN server)?
thanks~
___
sipx-us
y) and works fine in such cases.
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>
> On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:01 , Tony Graziano wrote:
>
> > I think if you listen to meL
>
> Assume you meant 'me' there, and I am!
>
>
> > use sipxbridge
On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:01 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> I think if you listen to meL
Assume you meant 'me' there, and I am!
> use sipxbridge to anchor the calls (otherwise you will not be able to
> transfer it)
Aha, that makes sense.
I was just curious about what in the bandwidth.com template m
TTY as in TDD?
I spent quite a bit of time looking into this awhile back and the only thing I
found was a mostly deprecated * module. TTY is dying anyway - most HOH people
moved to IM and SMS a decade (or more) ago.
The most promising development I've seen is http://www.realtimetext.org/ which
which I cannot see they are due to the limited
> information you have provided.
>
> If the invites are coming from vitelity on port 5060, it WOULD act as an
> unauthorized call.
>
> Change those two things. Use the bandwidth.com template and have vitelity
> send to port
I'm seeing 407 (Proxy Authentication Required) returned to incoming invites
from Vitelity. We have a no-registration (IP authentication) relationship with
them so it's possible I've missed something in the setup that would allow
unauthenticated invites from their IP.
This is the response sen
TSP proxy address.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
>> Probably, yes...
>>
>> On Jul 19, 2012 5:33 PM, "Kurt Albershardt" wrote:
>>>
>>> Do I need to configure a separate instance of sipXbridge if m
Do I need to configure a separate instance of sipXbridge if my provider sends
inbound calls from a different IP than the one to which I send outbound calls?
--thanks
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.
Not sure whose proxy that was, but it seems to have recovered.
On Jul 18, 2012, at 19:02 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Wiki has been returning 502 Proxy Errors for about an hour now.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
L
Wiki has been returning 502 Proxy Errors for about an hour now.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Can't seem to find the logging levels screen in the 4.6 GUI. No "Logging
Levels" under the System menu like 4.4, but there's a "Log Watcher" under
Diagnostics that looks like it might be similar.
Unfortunately, it only lists one option:
config
Logging Level(Default: CRIT
Still seeing these warnings when I update:
Updating : sipxfreeswitch-4.6.0-118.g86a83.x86_64
37/95
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.171f06: line 1: freeswitch.sh: command not found
___
On Jul 18, 2012, at 1:15 , Todd Hodgen wrote:
> Just for a point of discussion, setting these two password fields to random
> numbers doesn’t seem to provide any benefit to the administrator. I’m
> assuming these are required to be there rather than a blank space. It would
> be very benefic
On Jul 17, 2012, at 18:44 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> While sipXproxy.log (which appears to use UCT rather than localtime) has:
> "2012-07-18T00:35:02.725196Z":482:SIP:WARNING:sipx.murray-hotel.com:SipRouter-15:41C15940:SipXProxy:"SipTransaction::recurseDnsSrvChildren
&g
On Jul 15, 2012, at 3:08 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> I'd suggest putting the proxy and registrar log levels to debug and
> inspecting them when you try to register.
>
Debug was pretty noisy last time I tried it, so I started with setting both at
info.
sipregistrar.log had no events generated cor
On the fresh 4.6 install I just started up, the System / Date and Time menu
still produces:
An internal error has occurred. Click here to continue.
The ntp package is installed on the system, but ntpd will not start due to the
OpenVZ restrictions I mentioned a few days back.
_
ul 17, 2012, at 14:22 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> if the default sipdomain is: sipx.domain.com then there should be no
> zone file for "domain.com". Normally you would create a forward zone
> for "domain.com" and point it to its authoritative server.
>
> On Tue, J
Just an FYI -- after installing today's package updates on a 4.6 system which
has NTP configured as an unmanaged service, I get:
Running rpm_check_debug
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
ntp is needed by sipxsupervisor-4.6.0-104.g90aeb.x86_64
** Found 1 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum c
On Jul 17, 2012, at 14:17 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2012, at 11:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>
>> On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote:
>>
>>> ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an
>>> update to make sur
On Jul 14, 2012, at 11:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote:
>
>> ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an
>> update to make sure you have the latest.
>
> Ran an update yesterday PM and got nothing new
On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:06 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> I would install sipx as a subdomain (I.e. uc.sipdomain.TLD). I would point
> the firewall DNS forwarder for both the host and subdomain to sipx and let
> sipx run its own DNS.
>
Working towards that now, and I have been using sipx.domain.com as
On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:12 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> I think the thing you are leaving out is the phone config generated by sipx
> can load a different DNS setting than what you intended, which is why I
> suggested this deployment option to avoid a conflicting configuration on the
> UA itself.
>
On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:06 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> Pfsense has a plugin for version 1.2.3 to hand out tftp. Version 2.x can hand
> out boot server natively.
>
Thanks . 1.2.3 has been so little trouble for so long, but 2.x is on a CF card
waiting for a day to deploy.
> I'm not a snom fan and do
gt; installs just fine, and will support what you need, unless you are in need of
> an ACD.
On Jul 13, 2012, at 14:51 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2012, at 14:24 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>>> How do I conf
On Jul 15, 2012, at 3:08 , Tony Graziano wrote:I'd suggest putting the proxy and registrar log levels to debug and inspecting them when you try to register.I did quite a bit of that the other day and saw nothing in the logs other than a bunch of inter-cluster stuff -- nothing that I could associate
On Jul 15, 2012, at 2:38 , Michael Picher wrote:
> resolv.conf isn't going to help your phones any... it's just for that server
> itself. It tells the server where to go for DNS.
For someone who is quite familiar with DNS, what is the issue I'm trying to
solve?
> where are the phones getti
47:07:Transport Error: Pending packet 102: generating fake
[2] 14/7/2012 18:47:07:Registrar 1...@sipx.murray-hotel.com timed out
On Jul 14, 2012, at 18:36 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> DNS on the sipx box? I've not done anything there, just in pfSense (which is
> authoritative for th
to MMDDXX save the zone and ensure
> named is running then try again.
>
> On Jul 14, 2012 7:51 PM, "Kurt Albershardt" wrote:
> After building, destroying and re-building nearly 20 VMs over the past few
> days, I now am confident that I have a reproducible failure gett
After building, destroying and re-building nearly 20 VMs over the past few
days, I now am confident that I have a reproducible failure getting Snom 320
phones to register with 4.6:
4.4 procedure:
Build VM with Centos 5
Assign both A and in-addr records for VM IP to sipx.murray-hotel.com host
y
On Jul 14, 2012, at 11:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote:
>
>> ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an
>> update to make sure you have the latest.
>
> Ran an update yesterday PM and got nothing new
On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an
> update to make sure you have the latest.
Ran an update yesterday PM and got nothing new - has the repo location changed
since
On Jul 10, 2012, at 21:23 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:09 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2012, at 21:23 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>>>> Choosing the Date/Time men
On Jul 13, 2012, at 16:29 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> There is no built-in way to configure ntp as unmanaged service
> built-into sipxconfig in 4.4, which is why it was added to 4.6. The
> sipxecs startup script actually checks to see if it is running and may
> not likely play well if it is not.
Got
On Jul 13, 2012, at 14:24 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>> How do I configure ntp to be an unmanaged service in 4.4?
>
> what happened to you efforts on 4.6? It's almost released, why go thru
> the effort on 4.4?
I
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/SIP+Trunking does not seem to
describe the 4.4 user experience.
I an option found under Devices/Gateways to add a new gateway called "SIP
trunk" which has an option to "Use built-in SIP Trunk SBC"
Is this the method of managing sipXbridge in 4.4?
--t
On Jul 13, 2012, at 12:32 , Gerald Drouillard wrote:
>
> older versions of ubuntu have the ntp.conf file in
> /var/lib/ntp/ntp.conf.dhcp, you may want to delete that one
> and use the one in /etc
This is a Centos 5 install, but it will not run ntpd because the syste
On Jul 13, 2012, at 9:55 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Everything appears to be working in the GUI, with the exception of the "Date
> and Time" menu item, which produces the familiar
> An internal error has occurred. Click here
> <https://sipx.domain.com:8443/sipxconfig
I'm finishing up an OpenVZ template for sipx 4.4 and wondering how I should
best address the lack of ntpd in the OS:
root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup
Executing:
/sbin/service sipxecs start
error reading information on service ntpd: No such file or directory
ntpd: unrecognized service
ntpd: unrecog
On Jul 11, 2012, at 13:31 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> BTW - If the line is not
> registered, DO NOT check the box to restart it. It can't send a
> restart to a phone thats not registered. That's not a flaw its just
> how it "should work". (Hey, that phone didnt restart. Hey, why isn't
> it registered
Looks like this might be related to LLDP-MED. Even though I had not assigned a
VLAN in the config, the Cisco "Auto Voice VLAN" feature may have jumped in. I
defaulted the switch back to factory settings, with everything including voice
in VLAN 1. Now I'm still seeing provisioning failures, bu
was
> configured. Don't manipulate the file name. Delete the phone and
> create it with the proper mac address and project the file or you will
> never get updates.
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:40 , Kurt Alb
On Jul 11, 2012, at 10:28 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Firmware-Version: snom320-SIP 7.3.30 6059
Updating to firmware 8.7.3.7 does not fix this, but does seem to indicate a
problem with the generated config:
Clear settings from phone menu after DHCP fails, triggers reboot.
Unp
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:55 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> they do pull configs from the same host, and do so on reboots now.
Correction here - rebooting either from the webUI or by unplugging and
replugging the PoE causes the phones to hang on DHCP requests. If I 'cancel
out of that,
On Jul 10, 2012, at 19:47 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Choosing the Date/Time menu produced
>
> An internal error has occurred. Click here
> <https://sipx.domain.com/sipxconfig/restart.svc> to continue.
Got the same error page when choosing "Basic Network" from t
All three phones have pulled configs now, but none has successfully registered.
Displays show "NR" at the top and the web interfaces show:
Identity 1 Status: 1...@sipx.domain.com: Network Failure
I can ping all three phones from the sipx server command line. Don't see a
ping tool in the
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:40 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> As it turns out, I mis-read a "B" as an "8" when entering the MAC of the
> second phone above.
>
> Went into 'Phones" in the GUI and changed the MAC to the correct
> 0004133842b5, then hit &qu
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:31 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> [root@sipx ~]# ls -l /var/sipxdata/configserver/phone/profile/docroot/
> total 168
> -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 00041338400C.xml
> -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 000413384285.xml
> -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx si
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:08 , Michael Picher wrote:
> And you poured over the snom info in the wiki?
Yes - just fumblefingered the URL.
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:33 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
> Local file
> /var/sipxdata/configserver/phone/profile/...
Thanks for the pointer - they are there:
[root@si
On Jul 10, 2012, at 21:23 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>>> Choosing the Date/Time menu produced
>>>
>>> An internal error has occurred. Cli
Plugged in three Snom 320 phones after configuring MAC addresses and extensions
in sipx 4.6
sipx is not handling DHCP, so I entered the config URL via each phone's HTTP
interface.
Phones reboot, but no config gets loaded.
When I do a wget on
http://sipx.domain.com:8090/phone/profile/ddocroot/0
On Jul 10, 2012, at 15:29 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
> > I can disable NTP on the CT, but if sipxecs (at least in the groupinstall)
> > has a dependency on ntp, I'd prefer to configure around it so I don't get
> > overwritten on a future update. Preferred method
>
> In ntp settings there's an opt
roper expectations if they try
> this also.
>
> On Jul 10, 2012 4:56 PM, "Kurt Albershardt" wrote:
On Jul 10, 2012, at 19:17 , Jeff Gilmore wrote:
> Kurt,
> I'm glad you got things working finally!
>
> I'm interested in the results of your testing,
On Jul 10, 2012, at 8:29 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>> There seems be to a bug with ntpd service because of the leap second day.
>> http://serverfault.com/questions/403732/anyone-else-experiencing-high-rates-of-linux-server-crashes-during-a-leap-second
>>
> This may indeed be
On Jul 10, 2012, at 8:18 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> Oh ye of little faith.
>
> http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/10165-problem-with-ntpd-(leap-second-day-bug)
>
> Re: problem with ntpd (leap second day bug)
> Originally Posted by hamed
> There seems be to a bug with ntpd service because of the lea
On Jul 9, 2012, at 18:52 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> SINCE this is a Linux host, I think maybe you need a leap second fix for your
> kernel. Really, I think that's the problem. Waiting won't help.
>
There do seem to be a number of reports of Java processes hanging.
https://lwn.net/Articles/504658/
On Jul 10, 2012, at 7:37 , George Niculae wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
>> Still trying to understand how a leap second issue might affect a system
>> installed, updated, and restarted _after_ July 1st?
>
> Was the VM created before July
from ISO.
>
> Also, fyi and just so folks remember, the ISO is not re-created with every
> build of the code, only when there is a release that the development team
> feels it's necessary. So a 'yum update' is very critical for ISO installs.
>
> Mike
>
&
On Jul 9, 2012, at 18:52 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> I did the same install over the weekend without these kind of issues.
>
> Centos 6.2 minimal install.
>
> Set network info
>
> Yum install epel-release
> Yum update
> Reboot
> Yum groupinstall sipxecs
>
> I did use a vmware environment though. S
Built another Centos 6 VM from scratch this afternoon:
Allocated 3 CPUs and 4GB of RAM to the VM
ran 'yum update' and restarted VM.
Competed 4.6 install per wiki.
ran sipxecs-setup, answered questions, got:
Configuring system, this may take a few minutes...
then
for the next ~50 minutes, memory us
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
