http://www.sipfoundry.org/blog/1084285/new-sipxecs-user-forums-available-this-we-1
says
as of 12/12/2012 SIPfoundry mailing lists will no longer be available or
accessible (includes sipx-users, sipx-dev and sipx-infrastructure mailing
lists)
I'm confused...
From http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/FreeSWITCH+SIP+Trunking+Gateway
by way of the [SFwiki] list this morning:
As of FreeSWITCH version 1.2.3, FreeSWITCH mod_sofia has become mature enough
to handle all signalling demands from sipXecs, and can be used as a SIP
trunking/call
This makes a lot of sense to me.
On Aug 18, 2012, at 5:03 , Michael Picher wrote:
The other option here, which is where I had hoped were were heading with 4.6,
is to have a userID and an Extension field (not extension as an alias). This
way, a userID is really a userID and an extension is
On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:36 , Mircea Carasel wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Burleigh, Matt
matt.burle...@eiisolutions.net wrote:
Anyone know what the changes are for Bria 3.4.2? There are no release notes
or anything about it on Counterpath’s website. But all of over Bria users are
Just noticed that my NAT Traversal page (static public IP) is set for ports
5060/5061. If I'm using sipXbridge, should this be 5080/5081?
thanks~
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive:
Fixed in latest 4.6.0-233 CentOS RPMs.
thanks~
On Jul 30, 2012, at 14:11 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
Created http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10340
Quite likely a release blocker, but not my call.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users
They did just that at CT Expo for awhile...
On Jul 29, 2012, at 15:48 , Michael Scheidell wrote:
And if wishes were horses my driveway would prolly be full of crap.
P s, there is an rfc that says the pigs will fly given enough thrust. -:)
___
From the freeswitch-users list
Wondering if anyone has seen an effect on sipx media services in 4.6?
Begin forwarded message:
From: Ken Rice kr...@freeswitch.org
Date: July 26, 2012 1:03:38 MDT
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help freeswitch-us...@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users]
send me /etc/sipxpbx/sipxconfig.properties?
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
sipxconfig.log and tail of sipxagent.log (which was 2 MB) attached.
Updated via yum this morning and invoked 'sipxecs-setup --reset-all' (with
the same results.) Logs
did not add quotes -- and the URL at the end still has them:
[root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup --reset-all
This will wipe all configuration data from this server. Are you sure? [ enter
'y' or 'n' ] : y
Network settings:
IP address : 192.168.X.26
Would you like to configure your system's network
, at 13:01 , Tony Graziano wrote:
perhaps re-run the script and manually input the host and sipdomain (instead
of hitting enter) to see if it removes the quotes.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
did not add quotes -- and the URL at the end still has them
On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:22 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
We scrape host and domain from
/etc/sysconfig/network
so it probably *was* wrong there too. That value comes from using the
network config tool we launch from the setup-setup script. I say was
because we in turn write it back if
.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Just tried a couple variants of that - first one left the host and domain at
default and then I manually typed everything else -- that produced the same
result at the end:
https://sipx.domain.com;
Note spurious
.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Still no luck getting these to register with 4.6
Phones are showing network failure in the registration status and seeing
timeouts reaching the sipx box.
Network config (including DNS) in phones is the same as when
Still seeing this in the latest builds, FYI.
On Jul 17, 2012, at 17:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
On the fresh 4.6 install I just started up, the System / Date and Time menu
still produces:
An internal error has occurred. Click here to continue.
The ntp package is installed
browser at the following URL:
https://sipx.domain.com;
On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:31 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
Happened the first time I ran the script, FWIW.
Install was updated 2-3x before I ran setup (due to dependency glitches) so
it's not a good test case.
I'll re-install on a clean VM
Created http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10340
Quite likely a release a blocker, but not my call.
On Jul 30, 2012, at 14:05 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
First time running setup script on a freshly built Centos 6 VM:
[root@sipx ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network
NETWORKING=yes
On Jul 28, 2012, at 6:32 , Mircea Carasel wrote:
As long as sipxecs/openuc doesn't ship with a well known default
password. Hackers would write scripts to test logins with those
passwords. If the feature didn't work until an admin specified a
default password, that would be fine.
Yes, so
. There comes a point where reasonable implementation
strategies and responsible stewardship of your own user account have to meet.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Albershardt
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 10:11
Is this the first server in your cluster? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y
Configuring as the first server...
Tip: Use 'sipx.domain.com' as your SIP domain if you are
setting up for the first time or if you know you are only going to setup one
server. This can make configuration easier. You can always
One more minor glitch at the end of the script - looks like extra quotes in the
URL:
In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration
interface from your web browser at the following URL:
https://sipx.domain.com;
On Jul 28, 2012, at 13:53 , Kurt Albershardt wrote
Ran a 'yum update' on an unconfigured 4.6 (installed on 7/25, the one with the
unmet Homer dependency) and got only a couple of OS updates.
Running 'yum groupupgrade sipxecs' yielded 271 updates (now at 4.6.0.233)
Did a 'yum clean all' and restarted, then ran sipxecs-setup.
Five minutes later,
In a mixed device deployment (hard and soft phones) I can see a couple of
different ways to configure softphones and am wondering about the implications
of each.
I can assign a numeric extension to softphones just like we do for a hard phone.
I can also assign an alpha username based on email
Anyone have insights from this trace?
Thanks~
On Jul 24, 2012, at 14:32 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
Attached - thanks.
merged.xml
On Jul 23, 2012, at 19:29 , Tony Graziano wrote:
A graphic won't help anyone troubleshoot it. Post the trace file
Thanks for the wake-up!
Found a typo in the alias I setup for testing. Now inbound calls are working.
Back to 4.6 for another round of testing...
On Jul 25, 2012, at 12:51 , Tony Graziano wrote:
Explain what user or service has a did or alias of 5755195606. That is what
is. Being sent in
Ran a 'yum update' on my 4.6 test VM today and saw this, so I built a clean VM
and installed from scratch -- same errors at the end of the groupinstall:
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: sipxhomer-4.6.0-18.gf9da.x86_64 (sipXecs)
Requires: libresip.so()(64bit)
Error:
I'd ask for more detail on the lightning protection and associated grounding,
especially if you are in a lightning-prone area.
Sending a couple of the failed units to Audiocodes for a post-mortem might help.
On Jul 24, 2012, at 13:29 , Hay, Nathan wrote:
They are in two locations. Both on
Ack - sorry about the large attachment.
On Jul 23, 2012, at 18:26 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
Getting closer - have AON configured (thanks, Tony) on pfSense and am
receiving signaling on 5080. Now sipx is responding to invites with 302
first and then 407. There's obviously a lot of data
:
Read this
http://blog.myitdepartment.net/?p=37
On Jul 20, 2012 9:06 PM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
Your outbound Nat type needs to be set for static port before your Nat
rules are created.
On Jul 20, 2012 8:03 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Forgot
On Jul 21, 2012, at 11:08 , Tony Graziano wrote:
The NAT rules have to be created AFTER the outbound Nat rule otherwise they
stay randomized.
I do understand that, and was planning to do it by choosing Manual (AON) and
then rebuild my ruleset.
Download the config file made available. Put
I'm seeing 407 (Proxy Authentication Required) returned to incoming invites
from Vitelity. We have a no-registration (IP authentication) relationship with
them so it's possible I've missed something in the setup that would allow
unauthenticated invites from their IP.
This is the response
information you have provided.
If the invites are coming from vitelity on port 5060, it WOULD act as an
unauthorized call.
Change those two things. Use the bandwidth.com template and have vitelity
send to port 5080.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
I'm seeing
TTY as in TDD?
I spent quite a bit of time looking into this awhile back and the only thing I
found was a mostly deprecated * module. TTY is dying anyway - most HOH people
moved to IM and SMS a decade (or more) ago.
The most promising development I've seen is http://www.realtimetext.org/
On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:01 , Tony Graziano wrote:
I think if you listen to meL
Assume you meant 'me' there, and I am!
use sipxbridge to anchor the calls (otherwise you will not be able to
transfer it)
Aha, that makes sense.
I was just curious about what in the bandwidth.com template
) and works fine in such cases.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:01 , Tony Graziano wrote:
I think if you listen to meL
Assume you meant 'me' there, and I am!
use sipxbridge to anchor the calls (otherwise you will not be able
Wiki mentions 3-31000 for sipXrelay but I've seen mentions of 15000-15500
in a number of forum posts.
What do I need to allow for sipXbridge - ITSP behind NAT (with external
static IP stated, not using a STUN server)?
thanks~
___
Thanks!
On Jul 20, 2012, at 13:12 , Bryan Anderson wrote:
I only bring through the 3-31000 range to our systems. Based of what is
listed under System Server Server NAT Show Advanced Settings
-Bryan Anderson
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net
the
Clarity Q90D which connects to the headset port of TTY compatible phones. We
just had an office ask about it. I am not sure why yet but wanted to get the
info as soon as I could.
Thanks for the info.
-Bryan Anderson
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Kurt
users. IF YOU ARE NOT SUPPORTING REMOTE USERS you do not typically have to
NAT this OR port 5060. Outbound traffic is typically allowed or not allowd by
firewalls, we are talking about inbound traffic here.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Wiki mentions
Vitelity sending invites on 5080 now
Firewall NAT/PAT reconfigured to forward 5080 to 5080
Firewall says it's sending packets to sipx:
Jul 20 14:55:31 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP
Jul 20 14:55:29 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP
Jul 20 14:55:28 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060
.
I would look through the sipXbridge log (tail -f) when the call comes in to
see what is in the invite.
On Jul 20, 2012 5:11 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Vitelity sending invites on 5080 now
Firewall NAT/PAT reconfigured to forward 5080 to 5080
Firewall says it's sending
pfSense 1.2.3
On Jul 20, 2012, at 17:36 , Tony Graziano wrote:
What is the firewall?
On Jul 20, 2012 7:22 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Packets appear not to be making it out of the firewall, despite the fact that
it is logging them. The sipx box does not receive the packets
, at 17:36 , Tony Graziano wrote:
What is the firewall?
On Jul 20, 2012 7:22 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Packets appear not to be making it out of the firewall, despite the fact that
it is logging them. The sipx box does not receive the packets (at all.)
Both tcpdump
Do I need to configure a separate instance of sipXbridge if my provider sends
inbound calls from a different IP than the one to which I send outbound calls?
--thanks
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive:
, Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com wrote:
Probably, yes...
On Jul 19, 2012 5:33 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Do I need to configure a separate instance of sipXbridge if my provider
sends inbound calls from a different IP than the one to which I send
outbound calls
On Jul 18, 2012, at 1:15 , Todd Hodgen wrote:
Just for a point of discussion, setting these two password fields to random
numbers doesn’t seem to provide any benefit to the administrator. I’m
assuming these are required to be there rather than a blank space. It would
be very beneficial
Still seeing these warnings when I update:
Updating : sipxfreeswitch-4.6.0-118.g86a83.x86_64
37/95
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.171f06: line 1: freeswitch.sh: command not found
___
Can't seem to find the logging levels screen in the 4.6 GUI. No Logging
Levels under the System menu like 4.4, but there's a Log Watcher under
Diagnostics that looks like it might be similar.
Unfortunately, it only lists one option:
config
Logging Level(Default:
Wiki has been returning 502 Proxy Errors for about an hour now.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Not sure whose proxy that was, but it seems to have recovered.
On Jul 18, 2012, at 19:02 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
Wiki has been returning 502 Proxy Errors for about an hour now.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List
On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:06 , Tony Graziano wrote:
I would install sipx as a subdomain (I.e. uc.sipdomain.TLD). I would point
the firewall DNS forwarder for both the host and subdomain to sipx and let
sipx run its own DNS.
Working towards that now, and I have been using sipx.domain.com as the
On Jul 14, 2012, at 11:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote:
ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an
update to make sure you have the latest.
Ran an update yesterday PM and got nothing new - has the repo location
changed
On Jul 17, 2012, at 14:17 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
On Jul 14, 2012, at 11:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote:
ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an
update to make sure you have the latest.
Ran an update yesterday
Just an FYI -- after installing today's package updates on a 4.6 system which
has NTP configured as an unmanaged service, I get:
Running rpm_check_debug
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
ntp is needed by sipxsupervisor-4.6.0-104.g90aeb.x86_64
** Found 1 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum
, 2012, at 14:22 , Tony Graziano wrote:
if the default sipdomain is: sipx.domain.com then there should be no
zone file for domain.com. Normally you would create a forward zone
for domain.com and point it to its authoritative server.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net
On Jul 17, 2012, at 18:44 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
While sipXproxy.log (which appears to use UCT rather than localtime) has:
2012-07-18T00:35:02.725196Z:482:SIP:WARNING:sipx.murray-hotel.com:SipRouter-15:41C15940:SipXProxy:SipTransaction::recurseDnsSrvChildren
no valid DNS records found
On Jul 15, 2012, at 2:38 , Michael Picher wrote:
resolv.conf isn't going to help your phones any... it's just for that server
itself. It tells the server where to go for DNS.
For someone who is quite familiar with DNS, what is the issue I'm trying to
solve?
where are the phones getting
On Jul 15, 2012, at 3:08 , Tony Graziano wrote:I'd suggest putting the proxy and registrar log levels to debug and inspecting them when you try to register.I did quite a bit of that the other day and saw nothing in the logs other than a bunch of inter-cluster stuff -- nothing that I could
fine, and will support what you need, unless you are in need of
an ACD.
On Jul 13, 2012, at 14:51 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
On Jul 13, 2012, at 14:24 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
How do I configure ntp to be an unmanaged service
On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:06 , Tony Graziano wrote:
Pfsense has a plugin for version 1.2.3 to hand out tftp. Version 2.x can hand
out boot server natively.
Thanks . 1.2.3 has been so little trouble for so long, but 2.x is on a CF card
waiting for a day to deploy.
I'm not a snom fan and don't
On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:12 , Tony Graziano wrote:
I think the thing you are leaving out is the phone config generated by sipx
can load a different DNS setting than what you intended, which is why I
suggested this deployment option to avoid a conflicting configuration on the
UA itself.
OK,
On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote:
ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an
update to make sure you have the latest.
Ran an update yesterday PM and got nothing new - has the repo location changed
since
On Jul 10, 2012, at 21:23 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
On Jul 14, 2012, at 11:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote:
ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an
update to make sure you have the latest.
Ran an update yesterday PM and got nothing new - has the repo location
changed
After building, destroying and re-building nearly 20 VMs over the past few
days, I now am confident that I have a reproducible failure getting Snom 320
phones to register with 4.6:
4.4 procedure:
Build VM with Centos 5
Assign both A and in-addr records for VM IP to sipx.murray-hotel.com host
the zone and ensure
named is running then try again.
On Jul 14, 2012 7:51 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
After building, destroying and re-building nearly 20 VMs over the past few
days, I now am confident that I have a reproducible failure getting Snom 320
phones to register
:Transport Error: Pending packet 102: generating fake
[2] 14/7/2012 18:47:07:Registrar 1...@sipx.murray-hotel.com timed out
On Jul 14, 2012, at 18:36 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
DNS on the sipx box? I've not done anything there, just in pfSense (which is
authoritative for the zone.) When I
I'm finishing up an OpenVZ template for sipx 4.4 and wondering how I should
best address the lack of ntpd in the OS:
root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup
Executing:
/sbin/service sipxecs start
error reading information on service ntpd: No such file or directory
ntpd: unrecognized service
ntpd:
On Jul 13, 2012, at 9:55 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
Everything appears to be working in the GUI, with the exception of the Date
and Time menu item, which produces the familiar
An internal error has occurred. Click here
https://sipx.domain.com:8443/sipxconfig/restart.svc to continue
On Jul 13, 2012, at 12:32 , Gerald Drouillard wrote:
older versions of ubuntu have the ntp.conf file in
/var/lib/ntp/ntp.conf.dhcp, you may want to delete that one
and use the one in /etc
This is a Centos 5 install, but it will not run ntpd because the system
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/SIP+Trunking does not seem to
describe the 4.4 user experience.
I an option found under Devices/Gateways to add a new gateway called SIP
trunk which has an option to Use built-in SIP Trunk SBC
Is this the method of managing sipXbridge in 4.4?
On Jul 13, 2012, at 14:24 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
How do I configure ntp to be an unmanaged service in 4.4?
what happened to you efforts on 4.6? It's almost released, why go thru
the effort on 4.4?
I'm working them
On Jul 13, 2012, at 16:29 , Tony Graziano wrote:
There is no built-in way to configure ntp as unmanaged service
built-into sipxconfig in 4.4, which is why it was added to 4.6. The
sipxecs startup script actually checks to see if it is running and may
not likely play well if it is not.
Gotcha
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:09 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
On Jul 10, 2012, at 21:23 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Choosing the Date/Time menu produced
On Jul 10, 2012, at 21:23 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Choosing the Date/Time menu produced
An internal error has occurred. Click here
https
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:08 , Michael Picher wrote:
And you poured over the snom info in the wiki?
Yes - just fumblefingered the URL.
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:33 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
Local file
/var/sipxdata/configserver/phone/profile/...
Thanks for the pointer - they are there:
[root@sipx
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:31 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
[root@sipx ~]# ls -l /var/sipxdata/configserver/phone/profile/docroot/
total 168
-rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 00041338400C.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 000413384285.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:40 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
As it turns out, I mis-read a B as an 8 when entering the MAC of the
second phone above.
Went into 'Phones in the GUI and changed the MAC to the correct
0004133842b5, then hit OK and Send Profiles
Saw You are about to generate new
All three phones have pulled configs now, but none has successfully registered.
Displays show NR at the top and the web interfaces show:
Identity 1 Status: 1...@sipx.domain.com: Network Failure
I can ping all three phones from the sipx server command line. Don't see a
ping tool in the
On Jul 10, 2012, at 19:47 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
Choosing the Date/Time menu produced
An internal error has occurred. Click here
https://sipx.domain.com/sipxconfig/restart.svc to continue.
Got the same error page when choosing Basic Network from the lefthand side of
a phone device page
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:55 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
they do pull configs from the same host, and do so on reboots now.
Correction here - rebooting either from the webUI or by unplugging and
replugging the PoE causes the phones to hang on DHCP requests. If I 'cancel
out of that, I get
On Jul 11, 2012, at 10:28 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
Firmware-Version: snom320-SIP 7.3.30 6059
Updating to firmware 8.7.3.7 does not fix this, but does seem to indicate a
problem with the generated config:
Clear settings from phone menu after DHCP fails, triggers reboot.
Unplug
that was
configured. Don't manipulate the file name. Delete the phone and
create it with the proper mac address and project the file or you will
never get updates.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:40 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
As it turns out
On Jul 11, 2012, at 13:31 , Tony Graziano wrote:
BTW - If the line is not
registered, DO NOT check the box to restart it. It can't send a
restart to a phone thats not registered. That's not a flaw its just
how it should work. (Hey, that phone didnt restart. Hey, why isn't
it registered.
remember, the ISO is not re-created with every
build of the code, only when there is a release that the development team
feels it's necessary. So a 'yum update' is very critical for ISO installs.
Mike
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
On Jul 9, 2012
On Jul 10, 2012, at 7:37 , George Niculae wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Still trying to understand how a leap second issue might affect a system
installed, updated, and restarted _after_ July 1st?
Was the VM created before July 1st? I think run
On Jul 9, 2012, at 18:52 , Tony Graziano wrote:
SINCE this is a Linux host, I think maybe you need a leap second fix for your
kernel. Really, I think that's the problem. Waiting won't help.
There do seem to be a number of reports of Java processes hanging.
https://lwn.net/Articles/504658/
On Jul 10, 2012, at 8:18 , Tony Graziano wrote:
Oh ye of little faith.
http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/10165-problem-with-ntpd-(leap-second-day-bug)
Re: problem with ntpd (leap second day bug)
Originally Posted by hamed
There seems be to a bug with ntpd service because of the leap
On Jul 10, 2012, at 8:29 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
There seems be to a bug with ntpd service because of the leap second day.
http://serverfault.com/questions/403732/anyone-else-experiencing-high-rates-of-linux-server-crashes-during-a-leap-second
This may indeed be an issue between the VM
if they try
this also.
On Jul 10, 2012 4:56 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
On Jul 10, 2012, at 19:17 , Jeff Gilmore wrote:
Kurt,
I'm glad you got things working finally!
I'm interested in the results of your testing, as I too use Proxmox for other
servers and would love to host my
On Jul 10, 2012, at 15:29 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
I can disable NTP on the CT, but if sipxecs (at least in the groupinstall)
has a dependency on ntp, I'd prefer to configure around it so I don't get
overwritten on a future update. Preferred method
In ntp settings there's an option for
Plugged in three Snom 320 phones after configuring MAC addresses and extensions
in sipx 4.6
sipx is not handling DHCP, so I entered the config URL via each phone's HTTP
interface.
Phones reboot, but no config gets loaded.
When I do a wget on
+1 for that option from me.
So much better to manage paths and routing at the application layer than to
trust that BGP got it right.
On Jul 9, 2012, at 7:23 , Matt White wrote:
It would also be great if sixbridge and proxy can be assigned specfic listen
IP'sthen they could live on a
sipx 20 0 2505m 611m 13m S 230.4 29.9 2184:51 java
On Jul 8, 2012, at 19:44 , Tony Graziano wrote:
How much ram did you allot?
On Jul 8, 2012 6:16 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
On Jul 8, 2012, at 16:12 , Kurt Albershardt wrote:
after a restart Java is munching ~95
enough ram to prevent
using swap.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Allocated 2 gbytes RAM and 4 gbytes of swap to the VM. Was using 32% of
memory yesterday. Left it running all night and it's at 40% according to
Proxmox.
Top is still looking about
On Jul 9, 2012, at 9:43 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1666 sipx 20 0 2505m 611m 13m S 230.4 29.9 2184:51 java
Can you find out what application 1666 is?
ps aux -ww | grep 1666
[root@sipx ~]# ps aux -ww | grep 1666
sipx 1666
Did that, RAM usage stays the same -- just represents a lower percentage of the
system:
1666 sipx 20 0 2505m 611m 13m S 225.7 14.9 2581:37 java
On Jul 9, 2012, at 9:41 , Michael Picher wrote:
try giving the box 4 GB of RAM...
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Kurt Albershardt k
On Jul 9, 2012, at 12:30 , Douglas Hubler wrote:
Please run
tail -f /var/log/sipxpbx/sipxconfig.log
If the log keep growing and growing
Nothing has been appended to that file since yesterday - output matches what I
sent then:
[root@sipx ~]# tail -f /var/log/sipxpbx/sipxconfig.log
Built another Centos 6 VM from scratch this afternoon:
Allocated 3 CPUs and 4GB of RAM to the VM
ran 'yum update' and restarted VM.
Competed 4.6 install per wiki.
ran sipxecs-setup, answered questions, got:
Configuring system, this may take a few minutes...
then
for the next ~50 minutes, memory
On Jul 9, 2012, at 18:52 , Tony Graziano wrote:
I did the same install over the weekend without these kind of issues.
Centos 6.2 minimal install.
Set network info
Yum install epel-release
Yum update
Reboot
Yum groupinstall sipxecs
I did use a vmware environment though. SINCE this
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
I think its fixed in the 4.6 in the staging area but 4.6 needs some cleanup
still...
On Jul 7, 2012 6:23 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote:
Is there a dependency on mysql that's not being met by 'yum
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
