Re: [sipx-users] SIPXCDR errors

Hi, Elwin 2 - Not that easy way. All the ruby that does the job are placed in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sipxcallresolver-2.0.0/lib I believe you can edit any of the scripts and simply "sipxproc -r CallResover" to see your changes. Maybe the db/cdr_writer.rb can be of some help. In a quick and

Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22

Hi, Elwin. Can you provide a 32bits rpm so I can test it in here too? - MM On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Elwin Formsma wrote: > Tony, > > It was indeed reverted by Joegen (Ezuce). > However the Subscribe following user forwarding is a big issue for us. > Thats why we decided not to wait f

Re: [sipx-users] Message Waiting Issue

If in doubt, try one or two first. Assuming all the moving parts are OK(DNS,DHCP,LAN), you should be good to go with send profiles for all polycom phones you have. - MM On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Tommy Laino wrote: > > > I think I found my problem. My registration server in my > phone g

Re: [sipx-users] Message Waiting Issue

# free -m Easier to see the info on memory Have your problems started when you added the secondary server? What if you just reset the phone to factory defaults and do the provisioning using sipXconfig, as it should be. - MM On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Tommy Laino wrote: > > > Tony top

Re: [sipx-users] Message Waiting Issue

I believe it's the default behaviour to have FQDN as domain alias. - MM On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Tommy Laino wrote: > > > Tony I am not sure what top is. I do not believe that we are > using swap at all. Todd I would think that maybe you culd be > right but this is all the phones and i

Re: [sipx-users] SSL Certificates on distributed server - sipXecs 4.4.0

tificates> to regen your certs. - If you have more than one server, maybe you should run the gen-ssl-cert.sh script from /var/sipxdata/certdb or even pass the path using --workdir option. Sorry for being so prolix. - MM On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Mircea Carasel wrote: > >

Re: [sipx-users] Initial release: sipXecs 4.6.0

Allan: It was all part of the plan. I know it. :) Congratulations and thank you all! - MM On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Josh Patten wrote: > Alan: all the more reason to celebrate. > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Alan Worstell > wrote: > >> What better day than Repeal Day! >> http:

[sipx-users] SSL Certificates on distributed server - sipXecs 4.4.0

I'm having a hard time trying to update a certificate in my setup with two boxes: - Primary server has all the roles, but ACD - Secondary server has only ACD role I have read both wiki pages: http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/SSL+Certificates http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs

Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs 4.6 - sipxbridge requires manual restart after each server reboot.

Hmm, so it seems it is happening in other places of the system as well. I was experiencing configurations not being updated for OpenACD, Autoattendants in FS. - MM On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:04 PM, glomos-info wrote: > Hi, > > ** ** > > We are running sipx 4.6 in a test environment to eval

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Contact Center Hangup Issue

just make sure that the latest openacd is installed. > > Can yo do this? > > $ ls -1 /lib/openacd/lib/oacd_freeswitch/ebin/ | wc -l > (Or lib64) > > There should be 13. > > Jan Vincent Liwanag > jvliwa...@ezuce.com > > > > On Dec 4, 2012, at 6:22 AM, Melcon

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Contact Center Hangup Issue

] mod_erlang_event.c:1210 Error connecting to node open...@sip01.corp.voixtel.com.br (erl_errno=5, errno=0)! 2012-12-03 20:20:00.410965 [DEBUG] mod_erlang_event.c:1504 exit erlang_outbound_function Next step would be to reformat the entire disk and start a new install. Any other advices or do you n

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Contact Center Hangup Issue

Hi Douglas, I always knew sipXecs restarts its dead processes. Good to know that now you can disable it, as you said, comes really in hand in the lab. Thanks for the info - MM On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Melcon Moraes wr

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Contact Center Hangup Issue

roblem with the > restart script that needs fixing. > > $ pkill beam; sleep 10; service openacd start > > Let me know if this still occurs. > > Jan Vincent Liwanag > jvliwa...@ezuce.com > > > > On Nov 30, 2012, at 9:59 PM, Melcon Moraes wrote: > > Hi Jan, >

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Contact Center Hangup Issue

e basically is that openacd didnt restart right during the last > update. You might have to 'pkill beam' for now. Then do a 'service openacd > start'. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 30, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Melcon Moraes wrote: > > Not to me. Not sure if

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Contact Center Hangup Issue

integration files turned > out to be missing. Fixing this on the next RPM of openacd. > > > > Jan Vincent Liwanag > > jvliwa...@ezuce.com > > > > > > > > On Nov 29, 2012, at 12:19 AM, Alan Worstell > wrote: > > > >> On 11/28/12 7:44 A

Re: [sipx-users] ACD call drop after 60 sec on hold

Well, I would say not without some siptraces, logs and maybe a network capture. - MM On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Ali Dashti wrote: > Geoff, > However I only have this problem when an inbound call comes from ACD, > otherwise its OK! > In other word when an agent picks up only an ACD call a

Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22

benign and won't cause > any noticeable effect in traffic. > > Joegen > > > On 11/17/2012 07:19 AM, Melcon Moraes wrote: > > Hi, Joegen. > > It seems to be ok now. I've been using it all day and didn't notice any > side-effects, like the slower BLF

Re: [sipx-users] sipx 4.6 inbound ivr-->extension always not available

Even when "other phones" are from an ITSP call coming through the sipXbridge setup to play MoH? - MM On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Kumaran < thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com> wrote: > Bria won't support MoH..If Bria put on Hold other phones won't hear MoH.. > > Regards, > Kumaran T > >

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Contact Center Hangup Issue

Do you really have literally {SERVERNAME} on the output or you just "masked" the server name? You're supposed to have your FQDN in place. - MM On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Trevor L Benson wrote: > Jan, > > Response Inline: > > > > > On Nov 28, 2012, at 2:39 AM, Jan Vincent Liwanag > wrot

Re: [sipx-users] Upgraded to v4.4.0 and now no MWI

Not sure if that helps, but this option has been "always" present, even back to the 3.10.X. - MM On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Joegen Baclor wrote: > look for SIP_REGISTRAR.MWI.UA.CISCO : ^(CSCO|Cisco) in > /etc/sipxpbx/sipxregistrar/registrar-config.vm. Change it to > SIP_REGISTRAR.MWI.U

Re: [sipx-users] Call forwarding

Have you tried to wait for more than 20 seconds on and see if that goes to ? I believe that is what is going to happen. - MM On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Elwin Formsma wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a question about Call forwarding in SipXecs. The following > situation occurs: > > User

Re: [sipx-users] Problem starting OpenACD on sipx 4.6

It's working now. Thanks. openacd-0.9.5-741.gd7f6.x86_64 sipxopenacd-4.6.0-890.ge4ca9.x86_64 are the ones I have installed yesterday. - MM On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:23 AM, George Niculae wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Kumaran < > thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com> wrote: > >>

Re: [sipx-users] Problem starting OpenACD on sipx 4.6

I believe you hitted this: https://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/msg28473.html - MM On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Alan Worstell wrote: > Hello, > On a 4.6 system, I discovered that the service Contact Center (openacd) > was listed as shut down. Checking the box and selecting "restart"

Re: [sipx-users] Is there a roadmap date of when SipX 4.6 goes to stable?

And for new installs on 4.6, should we yum update daily as new packages are being compiled on a daily basis? - MM On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > short answer... > not officially released > > long answer... > 4.6 is not officially released even though i believe it to

Re: [sipx-users] Hacked SipXecs 4.4

What Tony meant to say is that in a near future, there will be no longer FTP provisioning for Polycom, so the user will probably be removed. Denying ssh access to polycom user won't affect FTP provisioning and will secure the box against the this exploit itself. Also, if you don't need the forward

Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22

eways failing. > > At any rate, SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY should not follow forwarding rules. > > Kyle > > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:52 AM, George Niculae wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Melcon Moraes wrote: >> >>> Hi George, >>> >

Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22

o the SUBSCRIBE request is a 405 - Method not allowed - MM On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Melcon Moraes wrote: > I couldn't restart sipxecs yet. I've just tried with restarting only > sipxproxy and sipxregistrar and the SUBSCRIBE still gets forked to every > contact received b

Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22

ts safe to say that the last change isn't really needed. I'll still wait for no calls in my system so I can restart sipxecs entirely and redo the tests. - MM On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Melcon Moraes wrote: > Can I just restart proxy and registrar for the test? Would that b

Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22

Can I just restart proxy and registrar for the test? Would that be enough for the test? I have some ongoing calls using sipXbridge and I wanted to avoid drop'em. - MM -- Melcon Moraes Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Friday, November 9, 2012 at 10:52 AM, G

Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22

ll of userforward targets. I'll try it and get back to you with the results. thanks in advance - MM On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:26 AM, George Niculae wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:52 PM, George Niculae wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Melcon Moraes

Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22

Couldn't find one. Just created [XX-10522] <http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10522> - MM On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Melcon Moraes wrote: > Is there a JIRA for this? > > - > MM > > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Joegen Baclor wrote: > >&

Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22

Is there a JIRA for this? - MM On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Joegen Baclor wrote: > My plate is a bit full currently but it should not take until mid > November for a fix to be out. > > > On 11/08/2012 06:25 PM, Elwin Formsma wrote: > > Hi George, > > Correct, stumbled uppon this issue on

Re: [sipx-users] FreeSWITCH for SIP Trunking

Can we simply drop in a new FS RPM package to replace the 1.0.7 version that comes with sipXecs and all the current working stuff will continue to work? On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > Yes, MoH, ring on transfer, etc. all works in my tests. > > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 6:00

Re: [sipx-users] Updating certs of HA system

Any updates on this, Jan? I was wondering too on how to update certs on a distributed scenario. - MM On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Jan Fricke wrote: > Hi, > > we have some systems where certificates will expire soon. > > For Non-HA systems creating and installing new certs is very easy. > >

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Busy Problem

I believe Jan is originating the call on the Polycom and the destination is a PSTN number through an ISDN conection. - MM On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Why would the phone ring busy? Have you artificially lowered the number of > calls per line? Is VM enabled on the lin

Re: [sipx-users] Getting 483 Too Many Hops Error

>From your packet capture named BroadVOX_Capture_726910-3.pcap there are 2 calls attempts. First one to 8004144231 and the secont to 6066796893 - both originated from 2165098666. In the first call, Max-Forwards is set to 8, which led the call to the 483 - Too many hops. You can see the INVITE in

Re: [sipx-users] Getting 483 Too Many Hops Error

Here you can have it: http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Display+SIP+message+flow+using+Sipviewer - MM On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Brian Buckles wrote: > Mike I'll send you a copy of a trace once I get the complete trace. In > the mean time I have a quick question. The link for S

Re: [sipx-users] 4.4 ACD pickup Beep

> reference 127.0.0.2 and not 127.0.0.1 and it would think the call is natted > and throw the public natted ip in the response. > > But I'm not sure if that is unique to us or not. We maintain our own > builds based on SLES so it may be in how we compile. > > -M > &g

Re: [sipx-users] 4.4 ACD pickup Beep

I am quite impressed with your success stories. :) I used to have an ACD running pretty well on a 4.0.2 box. Now, I have some 4.4 boxes and all kinds of issues. Have you ever faced some of them? - Audio issues. People complaining about chopping voice and noise. Indeed, if I call the extension di

Re: [sipx-users] Notice: sipXkarel no longer maintained by Karel

I've never faced DSP issues as well. However I have only 10+ phones installed, all T28. I do see some issues with BLF, as I mentioned in http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/msg39977.html Unfortunatelly, didn't have a chance to revisit. I still have some logs/traces to look. Have you tri

Re: [sipx-users] Reminder - demo this Thursday at 10 AM EDT for 1hr on G+

Hi, Douglas, Can we just revisit the password change strategy? I believe that just a quick recap on what's different would do it. - MM On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > Looking to get some sipxecs users to hang out with the developers. > > Moderator List (topics we'll co

Re: [sipx-users] AudioCodes Hookflash Settings

Actually, you need to check what is the hookflash timing on the maxattach as well. You might need to change either on AC or on maxattach in order to match each other. - MM On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Paul Needham wrote: > When trying to create a conference call using the flash key on an an

Re: [sipx-users] Yealink BLF Working?

Hello, Micail. You said "almost every feature..". What feature you saw it's not working properly? BTW, do you have any news on the new plugin for the whole Yealink lineup? Thanks. - MM On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Михаил Родионов wrote: > Hello there. > > We have working plugins for the

Re: [sipx-users] g.729 sip calls fail

Continue with setting log levels to INFO at least, for proxy, registrar and bridge then re-run the sipx-trace. Let's see how that goes now. - MM On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:03 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote: > Do you have any thoughts on what else I might look for? Is there something > else I should

Re: [sipx-users] g.729 sip calls fail

Simplest way, if you can afford it: 1 - Remove/rotate all your logs on /var/log/sipxpbx 2 - Do the call test scenario you want to investigate 3 - Run sipx-trace -a -o merged.xml One not-so-hard way to get the call-id is to look at the CDR(Diagnostics->Call Detail Records) for the call then cli

Re: [sipx-users] g.729 sip calls fail

The CANCEL is there because you have 2 phones registered under the same user and one of them answered the call first. Not a real issue. I didn't see the 488 Not Acceptable Here in the trace, but I noticed there was only g.729 codec in the first INVITE w/ SDP and after sipXbridge PCMU/PCMA. Maybe s

Re: [sipx-users] g.729 sip calls fail

I would start with a trace for a incoming call. - MM On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:46 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote: > I thought I would start a new thread because this no longer has anything > to do with ports and is an interesting problem. > I have been having a problem with appia. We have one of t

Re: [sipx-users] @emailremoved.c...@emailremoved.come@emailremoved.c...@emailremoved.comt@emailremoved.c...@emailremoved.comn@emailremoved.c...@emailremoved.com @emailremoved.c...@emailremoved.coml@em

What's wrong Matt? - MM On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Administrator wrote: > > > @mailto:emailremoved.c...@emailremoved.comh > mailto:@emailremoved.c...@emailremoved.coms > mailto:@emailremoved.c...@emailremoved.com > mailto:@emailremoved.c...@emailremoved.come > _

Re: [sipx-users] polycom ring

I'm curious on how did this end. I'm trying to set silent ring on one of the linekeys on IP33x. According to Polycom, the alertInfo has precedence over Distinctive Incoming Call Treatment and TUI, in that order. You can confirm that on the Admin Guide

Re: [sipx-users] Web portal customization in V4.4 - still valid?

It's not that clear. It's a mix of http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Customizing+Colors%2C+Layout+and+Logoand http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Localization Specifically, if you have followed the first link and created /etc/sipxpbx/sipxplugin.beans.xml and /etc/sipxpbx/myres.pro

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Remote Phone MWI

Why not combined? What are the cons? - MM On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 17:48, Michael Picher wrote: > and make sure you use 3.2.6 split, not combined > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Tony Graziano < > tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote: > >> One of two things has happened. >> >> 1. You ha

Re: [sipx-users] sipfoundry servers were rebooted over the weekend

I can't see any pages on the wiki while logged in. Is it just me? It says "Your are not permitterd to perform this operation." in any links. - MM On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 15:01, Douglas Hubler wrote: > If you notice any issues w/tracker, wiki or www, please let me know. > list server wasn't r

Re: [sipx-users] Hold BUG on 4.4 using HOLD on Polycom phones

So, is the 3.2.6 a better option for sipx 4.4? - MM On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 15:42, Tony Graziano wrote: > It seems as though Polycom fixed this in 3.2.6, my original > troubleshooting was not using this version. I think it may also have > fixed ringbacks for blf when using efk alss, I should know

Re: [sipx-users] Lync with sipxtapi

He just did it. :) - MM On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 21:37, Todd Hodgen wrote: > Are you going to keep us in suspense? > > ** ** > > *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto: > sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony Graziano > *Sent:* Friday, October 28, 2011 4

Re: [sipx-users] Monitored BLF button shows ringing on phones with EFK after an attended transfer or directed call pickup

I have experienced the continously "busy" for a monitored speed dial. Too bad I had no time to dig further on that and I don't have any more valuable info at the moment. :( - MM On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:44, Nathaniel Watkins wrote: > I have the following scenario: > > ** ** > > A monito

Re: [sipx-users] AudioCodes 320HD - MWI SUBSCRIBE

Hmm, too rush. There's already a JIRA open for that: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XTRN-1072 - MM On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 21:02, Melcon Moraes wrote: > Does anyone got issues with the new 320HD phones, regarding MWI? > > It seems that the SIP URI in SUBSCRIBE used by the

Re: [sipx-users] Modify Caller ID based on criteria

The built in ACD already does that and you don't need to tell it to do so. - MM On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 13:09, Max DiOrio wrote: > Josh…is that the built in ACD system or OpenACD? Does it automatically > append the queue name, or do I have to tell it to? Thanks. > > ** ** > > *From:* sip

Re: [sipx-users] IM - MyBuddy

This sounds like a recursion problem. Once "you said" all of your calls go to voicemail by setting your IM Status to DND, even the calls from the CallControler/MyBuddy are going to VM. So, no listen/pickup unless there's a way to start that call with some sort of URI parameters or additional head

Re: [sipx-users] Race condition in sipXproxy

Nice catch, Sven! I have seen the same thing happening; just couldn't find when or why it starts. In my case, the caller is an MP-124 gateway and the session timeout is 30 minutes. From what I found so far, when the re-INVITEs are answered, the new real call lasts for less than 2 seconds. I guess

Re: [sipx-users] Slightly OT: Bricking Audiocodes MP114

Did you mean Audiocodes BOOTP tool? - MM On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:23, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) < mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com> wrote: > FYI, after de-bricking it with with the Polycom BOOTP tool, it took the > latest 5.8 fine. No more 6.x for me! > > > On 5/16/2011 7:24 PM, Todd Hodgen wr

Re: [sipx-users] Sipx 4.4.0, failed external forward, Verizon VoIP

But that, only after all the other destinations, right? - MM On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:17, Tony Graziano wrote: > I think it need to be set for "at the same time" if there is no phone. The > "no answer" method makes the VM server answer in 20 secs... > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Matth

Re: [sipx-users] web gui crashes often

Something already took that port, that's why the log says "Address already in use" I'm just not sure which port we're talking about. I would say 8080. - MM On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:57, Tony Graziano wrote: > Then why does it show its already bound? If you run ifcfg from a console, > does it sh

Re: [sipx-users] Sometimes SipXmaster & SipXredundant (4.0.4) are not responding network requests until reboot

Maybe a misconfigured DNS, slowing your name resolution. Even when receiving the replies every 10 seconds, do you get them in order? I mean, no packet is lost? For instance: $ ping 172.20.0.20 PING 172.20.0.20 (172.20.0.20) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 172.20.0.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=12

Re: [sipx-users] [sipx-dev] Welcome to Ioan Kiss

Welcome, Ioan. BTW, when I read this, the first thing that came on my mind was Josh's adventures on AD <-> sipXecs. :) - MM On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 22:02, Josh M. Patten wrote: > Awesome, welcome aboard. > > What MS integrations are we talking about here btw? > --

Re: [sipx-users] [sipx-dev] Welcome to Joegen Baclor

Welcome Joegen! - MM On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:05, Martin Steinmann wrote: > Please welcome Joegen Baclor to the sipXecs project. As the founder and > architect of the OpenSBC project, an open source effort he started in 2005, > Joegen is a dedicated open source developer with a host of expe

Re: [sipx-users] BLF List URI | Cisco SPA500 series

Is this wiki still closed? I couldn't access it. On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:02, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Positively Optimistic > [positivelyoptim

Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group call pickup non-functional

I can't read http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-4775 :( On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 13:09, Josh Patten wrote: > http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8438 Got the EDE snapshot with all > services running in DEBUG logging level > > Josh Patten > Assistant Network Administrator > Brazos County IT D

Re: [sipx-users] 3.10.2 to 4.2 with External Aliases File

I had a 3.10 with external authrules and fallbackrules and upgraded to 4.0 without any issue. Not sure about the external aliases, but I think it will go well. When the time comes, I'll try an upgrade to 4.2. - MM On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:02, Pete Burgess wrote: > Thanks for the opinions. I

Re: [sipx-users] primary server CDR issue

Which stunnel version were you running? - MM On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 19:35, Josh Patten wrote: > Rolling back stunnel to version 4.26.1 seems to fix the issue. > > Josh Patten > Assistant Network Administrator > Brazos County IT Dept. > (979) 361-4676 > > > On 5/24/2010 5:21 PM, Josh Patten wr

Re: [sipx-users] Private dialing rules

How is the other way around behaving, as in a 4.0.4 box calling the 4.2.0 box? - MM On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 14:39, Tony Graziano wrote: > I am testing an ipsec connection and routing calls from a 4.0.4 system and > a 4.2 system via a site-to-site rule. > > Both my sipx systems can resolve each o

Re: [sipx-users] Release 4.0.4

Can I safely assume that there will be no FC8 4.0.4 packages in sipfoundry? - MM On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:57, Scott Lawrence wrote: > Release 4.0.4 is posted - since we never formally designated 4.0.3 as > 'LatestStable', the following list is all the fixes since 4.0.2: > > Bugs Fixed > > [X

Re: [sipx-users] Dialing Extensions Internally

He's using the latest stable, installed from CentOS ISO (4.0.1-015823 2009-06-19T06:28:39 ecs-centos5.x64) He just filled JIRA with the wrong version. - MM On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: > Usually, if you can’t call another extension but you can call the AA system > you

Re: [sipx-users] [sipX-dev] Release 4.0.1 is posted

I was about to yum update sipxecs when I noticed that there is no RPMs for FC8. Are they gone for good? - MM On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Two questions about upgrading: > > >From 3.10.3, are there any special steps to take (backup) and then just > >"yum" it? > >From

Re: [sipx-users] Yum updates and upgrades

You could also do it directly from the command line: # rpm -Uvh http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/5.2/os/i386/CentOS/centos-release-5-2.el5.centos.i386.rpmand save yourself some steps. - MM On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > I opened an issue for that and it was close

Re: [sipx-users] Errors after restoring from backup (using different DNS settings)

What about re-run sipxecs-setup or the ssl part of it somehow(command line parameter maybe)? - MM On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Damian Krzeminski wrote: > Keith Gearty wrote: > > I did a clean installation of SipX 4.0.0 and restored a backup of my > > previous 4.0.0 system (exact same build).

Re: [sipx-users] Feature-List says: SOAP Web Services Access to CDR Data, but how?

http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SipX_ConfigServer_SOAP_API On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Rene Pankratz wrote: > Hello List members, > in the Feature description of SipXecs is mentioned a SOAP Interface to CDR > data, but i cannot find any documentation about it. > Does anyone know wher

Re: [sipx-users] unable to register xlite with Sipx

http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SipX_Phone_Registration_Troubleshooting http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_configure_Xten_SIP_softphones_with_sipX - MM On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Leonardo Mateo wrote: > Hi I'm running SIPX on a virtual machine, and I'm in the process of >

Re: [sipx-users] Lots of Speed Dials and Incoming Caller id mapping

That's new for me. I can't remember seeing a CSV exported from the system with the forward rules on it. Is it something available 3.8 or older, cause from 3.10 on there's no such thing. - MM On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Did you create a sample then export it to see i

Re: [sipx-users] Lots of Speed Dials and Incoming Caller id mapping

How the legacy PBX is supposed to reach the users moved onto sipX? How the calls from the legacy PBX will hit the sipX box? If all the moved users have DID numbers, you just need to add an alias for each one. If not, maybe setup an auto-attendant on the sipX asking for the extension number. - MM

Re: [sipx-users] Upgrade from 3.11.12 to 4.0 stable - EPIC FAIL!

If you still wanna try it, the sipxconfig.properties is the file you need to change. I think the lines you need to remove are: 1. locationsMigrationTrigger.hostname 2. sipImpl.hostIpAddress 3. sipImpl.proxyPort 4. sipImpl.hostName 5. sipImpl.proxyHost They might be shown at the end

Re: [sipx-users] Where can I download a sipX 3.6.7 ISO?

I thought that 3.6.7 was a stable release, as in major version 3, minor 6 and update 7. From which version on this rule applies? - MM On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > I'm not sure I would agree. > > 3.6.7 is an odd release, and probably was never a "stable" release. > 3.6.0

Re: [sipx-users] Directed Call Pickup code

Try System > Servers > YOUR SERVER > SIP Registrar under the Services Table. - MM On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Keith Gearty wrote: > In 3.10 the directed call pickup code could be changed in System > > General > Call Pickup. In 4.0 that menu location doesn't exist and I > can't find the di

Re: [sipx-users] Remote Worker Call Quality

Tim already answered that: > The sipXecs box is a Pentium 4 3.20GHz with 512MB of RAM dedicated for sipXecs. It is not running inside a virtual machine. When testing, there were no other calls on the box. - MM On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > A little late to the conversa

Re: [sipx-users] Wiki broken URL

Done. Also, I have updated http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Express_Development_Environment_Setup_4.0as well. - MM On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Arnaldo de Moraes Pereira wrote: > On > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Express_Development_Environment_Setup, > the URL to Fedora Cor

Re: [sipx-users] crontab script

Not to mention that if you only want the restart once a week, consider specifying the weekday for that: # this file will restart the sipxpbx service once a week(every Sunday) at 3 am 00 03 * * sun COMMAND 05 03 * * sun COMMAND - MM On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Damian Krzeminski wrote: >

Re: [sipx-users] ISO images not creating a bootable CD

Can you boot from any other bootable CD, let's say, Ubuntu, Fedora X or even some version of Windows? On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Lorne Kerney wrote: > I should have been more specific.  I see the message booting from CD, > then the word failure is displayed with no further information, fo

Re: [sipx-users] good book about SIP

You can spend some time at http://www.tech-invite.com as well. -MM 2009/4/3 Daniel Longhi-TI Infra-Estrutura : > Hello sipx guys, > > I want o learn about SIP. > I would like to know if you guys have any good book recomendation (or > any other good resource). > > > I got this one and I'm enjoying

Re: [sipx-users] Routing calls from another PBX to the PSTN

I think he meant to create just 1 account on sipX for the gateway, not all the hundred users from the legacy PBX. -MM On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM, milosz wrote: > i wonder how easy it would be to > > (1) pull the list of extensions off your pbx and throw them in an > excel sheet (or somethin

Re: [sipx-users] SipXecs 3.11.12 Gateway vs Dialing Rulles Error/Bug

180.76.166 >    username >    password >    202.180.76.166 >    0 >    UDP >    true >    false >    true >    true >    600 >    CR-LF >    NONE > > > > Thank you > Grant > > > From: M. Ranganathan [mra

Re: [sipx-users] SipXecs 3.11.12 Gateway vs Dialing Rulles Error/Bug

When you say "gateway is at the top of", are you refering to the Gateways list at Devices/Gateways or the list inside your Local Diaplan rule at System/Dialplan ? -MM On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Grant Lang wrote: > Hi, > > Yes you are correct Local Auckland has an area code of 9 and Tauranga

Re: [sipx-users] sendmail configuration error

Try #> yum install sendmail-cf -MM On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Keith Gearty wrote: > I'm trying to rebuild the sendmail.cf file on my SipX server, but there > seems to be an import error in the sendmail.mc file that comes with > SipX.  Since this is a configuration issue specific to the Sip

Re: [sipx-users] Unable to install sipx from FC/8 repo

Not sure I understand. "It changes more smoothly" means the CentOS distro repository or the sipX repo for CentOS? On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 18:04 -0500, Kevin Thorley wrote: >> I am working on setting up a sipx server for use by my local Linu

Re: [sipx-users] Recording in SipX

That might give you some pointers. http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/msg12706.html -MM On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Jason Basdeo wrote: > This is very sad news! Could anyone recommend an alternative solution then? > Thanks Bob for the heads up. > > > > Jason Basdeo > > Tier 2 A

Re: [sipx-users] Display SIP message flow using Sipviewer

No attachments detected. On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Roman Rodriguez wrote: > Scott, than you for the information about this tool. > > Please, could you help me with this issue I have between SCS 500 and Huawei? > > I attach the mail with the request. > > Thank very much for your help. > > R

Re: [sipx-users] Sipx dialplans

That sounded weird to me. Did you activate your dialplan in the first place? I understand the "optional prefix" as if you dial it, I'll strip it out. Am I right? -MM On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Andreas Speck wrote: > Hi Tony, > > thanks - that now allows me to do SkypeOut calls. But this

Re: [sipx-users] ACD recording

You might want to take a look at this: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.sipx.devel/12171/focus=12273 -MM On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Daniel Orcutt wrote: > I was wondering how to record calls, both ACD calls and non ACD calls. > > > > ___

Re: [sipx-users] 3.10.3 iso?

The only available ISO is for CentOS 5. For those who already have an FC8 ISO install running, is there going to be FC8 3.10.3 rpms? -MM On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 08:50 -0500, Picher, Michael wrote: > >> Is there going to be a 3.10.3 iso? >

Re: [sipx-users] [Fwd: Re: Sipx Installation : Pulling My Hair out]

Your 'stable' installation isn't stable at all. By the pastebin you send me, you have the .repo file downloaded as .repo.1, meaning you already had one with the same name in place. Check your /etc/yum.repo.d files for duplicates and remove the one that still has the unstable repo active. Let's tr

Re: [sipx-users] Sipx Installation : Pulling My Hair out

Why don't you start with an ISO image? https://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/ISO/ -MM On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Gijs Nelissen wrote: > I tried installing on ubuntu intreprid, mass dependancy errors and > eventually (after fixing all dependencies) compile errors. > > After that i tr

Re: [sipx-users] Incoming Calls and ACD

Just to give you something to play while we look at the logs, Login: *88 Logout: *86 -MM On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Daniel Orcutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all. I am attempting to configure sipx to use ACD to potentially > replace my existing non-voip PBX. I am having issues rec

  1   2   >