Re: [sipx-users] SIP route to SIP_DOMAIN_NAME does not match the configured IP address

2009-07-17 Thread voice
into this issue before. I'm running 4.1.0 not 4.0.1. r On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 12:28 -0500, voice wrote: Just got this Error after a reboot of 4.1.0 just now. SIP route to SIP_DOMAIN_NAME does not match the configured IP address Server has been working aok for weeks. At least at the moment

Re: [sipx-users] SIP route to SIP_DOMAIN_NAME does not match theconfigured IP address

2009-07-17 Thread voice
Hi Kevin I ran the DNS advisor from a MS server box and this is what was said. What is my callserver-name? It looks like i should be running the sipx-dns on the sipx1 box. The dns-advisor statement is under-stated. Please advise. i guess it should look like this from the linux command

Re: [sipx-users] SIP route to SIP_DOMAIN_NAME does not match theconfigured IP address

2009-07-17 Thread voice
I don't want to just reinstalled and side step this problem but may have too. Primary DNS does not seem to be the problem for if it was i would not be able to access the admin runing FQDM of sipX1 box from another networked box, right? is it possible to reinstall bind running on the sipx1

Re: [sipx-users] Standard error: Proxy Domain is mandatory for ITSP accounts

2009-06-05 Thread voice
This is the error i am dealing with: Standard error: Proxy Domain is mandatory for ITSP accounts I installed the 4.10 version lastnight and was surprised that the Caller-Id page was the same as 4.0 and not like your page on the wiki. My provider Broadvox like Bandwidth and ATT does not require

Re: [sipx-users] Standard error: Proxy Domain is mandatory for ITSP accounts

2009-06-04 Thread voice
Hi Get this sip truning error Standard error: Proxy Domain is mandatory for ITSP accounts our ITSP does not require registraion, username or password Just theit ipaddr for Orgination and a 2nd ipaddr for Termination. Could this be a port conflict. We only see this when we run sipX from a

Re: [sipx-users] is list off-line for good?

2009-06-04 Thread voice
___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] is the list off line?

2009-06-03 Thread voice
from https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users link seems down. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe:

Re: [sipx-users] [sipX-dev] sipXecs 4.0.0 is released!

2009-04-28 Thread voice
Hi Scott Thank you very much. Your team has done a fantastic job. Believe it or not I have been talking up this project since before 3.10. I have had 3.10 in production since it was released and it has worked flawlessly. I look forward to using this latest version r - Original Message

[sipx-users] Can support one and two armed operation: ?? to Ranga

2009-02-25 Thread voice
That wiki is out of day 3 months ago. Your recommendation has no workable outcome. You are handling us. r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe:

[sipx-users] sipx-users] FW: Can support one and two armed operation: ?? to Kenny

2009-02-25 Thread voice
Of course. This group has been getting a bit stale as of late. You are right on about the sipX but dead wrong about sipXbridge. r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] Can support one and two armed operation: ?? to Scott

2009-02-25 Thread voice
at 11:53 -0600, voice wrote: Please name the commercial version you are talking about I meant the Nortel SCS500 http://www.nortel.com/scs500 sipXecs version 4.0 will be the basis for SCS500 version 3.0 -- Scott Lawrence tel:+1.978.288.5508 sipXecs project coordinator - http

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and Linux Virtual Machine to Ranga

2009-02-25 Thread voice
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:04 PM, voice vo...@xx wrote: Has anyone tried to run sipXbridge in a linux virtual machine? r In answer to your questions: 1. Two armed operation : Not supported for this release. sipxbridge

[sipx-users] sipx-users] Unable to run 3.11 on Centos5

2009-02-24 Thread voice
Oh you again, what no good morning. We are runing 3.10 with inGate in production and expect 3.11 to behave identically in basic functionality. I should be able to run the web admin from right out of box SVN install. Scott said something about some services needed to be started but

[sipx-users] sipx-users] Unable to run 3.11 on Centos5 to Kevin

2009-02-24 Thread voice
I never get that far. Web admin does not come up. Browser said everything seems ok but i am unable to make a connection. I'm sorry if i did not make that clear. I'm not sure where or when you jumped into this conversation. But i do appreciate your input. How did you resolve your issues

[sipx-users] sipx-users] Unable to run 3.11 on Centos5 to Kevin

2009-02-24 Thread voice
Please explain how to run sipxproc from Centos5? sipXproc does not seem to be a shell. r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe:

[sipx-users] Unable to run 3.11 on Centos5 to Kevin

2009-02-24 Thread voice
Found the /usr/bin/sipxproc and everyone is disabled. Did not find sipxconfig but did find sipx-config Please send me your cheat sheet on the procedure and the order of manually running each service as you explained briefly in an earlier email on how you got most to start. thanks

Re: [sipx-users] [sipX-dev] How to manually start services after fresh3.11install. to Kathleen

2009-02-24 Thread voice
I owe you one. r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

[sipx-users] sipx-users] Unable to run 3.11 on Centos5 to Scott

2009-02-24 Thread voice
Do you think it's time to remove the invitation to try sipXbridge from the sipfoundry.org main page while 3.11 is broken. r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users

[sipx-users] How to manually start services after fresh3.11install. to Kathleen, Kevin

2009-02-24 Thread voice
Kathleen i appreciate your input but it look like you jumped into this conversation somewhere in the middle. I am using the SVN version. The sipx-setup look promising but i think you assume i did an ISO install. I have a complete SVN installation NIC were set properly in the first place and

[sipx-users] How to manually start services after fresh3.11install. to Kevin

2009-02-24 Thread voice
sipxconfig is not forn on my Centos5 SVN installation. r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

[sipx-users] How to manually start services after fresh3.11install. to Kathleen

2009-02-24 Thread voice
I now owe you twice. So what will it be? Do you have a Paypal account? r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe:

[sipx-users] Unable to run 3.11 on Centos5 to Mike

2009-02-24 Thread voice
Push Back Why do you accept that you had to do a search in the first place? Some of these guy are still in the sand box controlling the fire engine. r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive:

[sipx-users] Can support one and two armed operation: ??

2009-02-24 Thread voice
Does not this mean 2 NIC's Otherwise some please explain this http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SipXbridge_Overview_and_Configuration Can support one and two armed operation: Can be configured to ITSP facing side of the B2BUA on a publicly route-able address that is different from the side

[sipx-users] Configure and start the NAT Traversal Relay (sipxrelay)

2009-02-24 Thread voice
Dose the sipXrelay still exist as a separate service or is it now buried under the hood? r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe:

[sipx-users] sipXbridge port addressing

2009-02-24 Thread voice
In SipXbridge can external port and Public port be the same port address both 5060? r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe:

[sipx-users] sipXbridge and Linux Virtual Machine

2009-02-24 Thread voice
Has anyone tried to run sipXbridge in a linux virtual machine? r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

[sipx-users] Can support one and two armed operation: ?? to Ranga

2009-02-24 Thread voice
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:04 PM, voice vo...@xx wrote: Has anyone tried to run sipXbridge in a linux virtual machine? r In answer to your questions: 1. Two armed operation : Not supported for this release

[sipx-users] sipx-users] sipXbridge port addressing to Ranga

2009-02-24 Thread voice
You should seriously consider changing the wording in in your explanation to how to setup SIP in SBC setup in sipxbridge by substituding the first ITSP in each sentence with sipxbridge. [sipx-users] sipXbridge port addressing a.. From: voice vo...@xx b.. Date: Tue, 24 Feb

Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge and Linux Virtual Machine

2009-02-24 Thread voice
: M. Ranganathan mra...@x b.. Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:25:12 -0500 On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:04 PM, voice vo...@xx wrote: Has anyone tried to run sipXbridge in a linux virtual machine? r

[sipx-users] Unable to run 3.11 on Centos5

2009-02-23 Thread voice
Seems to be installed properly. All dhcpd, named and zones tests are working. Is 3.11 broken? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe:

Re: [sipx-users] sipX == OSBC working aok

2009-01-07 Thread voice
Hi Scott I was able to get sipX and OSBC running in one box. I want to thank you and others who tried to help along the way. r - Original Message - From: Scott Lawrence To: sipx-dev Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 5:45 PM Subject: [sipX-dev] Server Roles This is a

Re: [sipx-users] orbits.xml missing after fresh install

2008-12-22 Thread voice
Hi Scott Was this a bug? I will ask the bug list. r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] Interest in a Sipx Forum?

2008-12-22 Thread voice
Nearly 3 years ago i suggested that this list create a forum like the XajaX forum because to seach this wiki was usless and the list* was designed to make contact with other list uses nearly impossible let along trying to search if a question had been asked and answered or non-answer a project

[sipx-users] orbits.xml missing after fresh install

2008-12-21 Thread voice
Hi Any ideas about this one? r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] [OpenSIPStack] OSBC== sipxecs always uses port 5060?

2008-12-21 Thread voice
Hi raymund In the sipXecs wiki you state Note: Dues to a limitation where the gateway configured in sipxecs always uses port 5060, OSBC can not be used for FENT and SIP Trunking simultaneously. But the gateway in sipX gateways can be set to any port. Click advanced settings and select any

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs-OpenSBC Wiki **Correction***

2008-12-20 Thread voice
Toll Free 866.938.0070___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] How to get x-lite 4.0 to register frominGate/SBC -sipX

2008-10-27 Thread voice
to reflect the ALIAS IP instead of the main ETH0 IP. It also assumes remote sip connectivity is turned on. Here we use DNS SRV for everything, so no reconfig for counterpath is needed based on network location. voice [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/27/2008 12:07:01 PM ? Hi Has anyone gotten x-lite

Re: [sipx-users] Remote softphone support

2008-10-25 Thread voice
Hi Does pingtel/sipX support any remote softphone registration product? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe:

Re: [sipx-users] how to configure sipxecs 3.10 with OpenSBC ?

2008-10-25 Thread voice
I am willing to help this sub group with setup, configuration and testing OSBC. I have played with it over the last 2 yrs. an abandon it in favor of inGate Firewall/Siparator. Siparator is a great SBC and works like a charm but their never ending licensing mechanisism sucks. If anyone is

Re: [sipx-users] how to configure sipxecs 3.10 with OpenSBC ?

2008-10-25 Thread voice
To Anebi in sipX 3.10 set the SBC to the OSBC's Public address and set the sipX gateways to the Termination ipaddre of the SIP Trunk (ST). Who are you using for SIP Trunking? You will have to create 2 Gateways one for local calling within your Area code and 1 for long distance both pointing

Re: [sipx-users] InGate Relay ports sipX

2008-10-14 Thread voice
Hi Is there a list of inGate relay ports needed to be open to allow sipx on private network? r___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe:

Re: [sipx-users] the Configuration Diagnotic test.

2008-10-14 Thread voice
Hi How reliable is the Configuration Diagnotic test.? All test fail from a new installation. The npdt, named, TFTP and DNS servers are up and running on the Centos5, aok but the Configuration Diagnotic test results are failing. ___ sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] ingate, sipx 3.10, Grandstream 200/2000

2008-10-12 Thread voice
Hi Has anyone been able to configure 3.10.2 with inGate and Grandstream 200 or 2000 phones. If yes please send whatever you can Also TFTP is installed and seems to be working but fails the Configuration Diagnotic test. r___ sipx-users mailing list